Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
What "fines"? This has been explained many times in this thread. These are not fines.Still doesn't make excessive fines ok.
Nor does it make the process of filing an appeal nearly impossible ok either.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What "fines"? This has been explained many times in this thread. These are not fines.Still doesn't make excessive fines ok.
Nor does it make the process of filing an appeal nearly impossible ok either.
That is not true. He had a an alternative that he ignored. He could have gone to the judge. He could have admitted that he cannot raise a bond. And then he could have offered properties up as collateral. He would have to offer up more than enough to cover the disgorgement and interest. But here is where it could go very well for him. He could have offered up the deeds for the judge to hold. If he lost, the control of the deeds would be in the state's hands. If he won, he would get the deeds back and not owe anything nor would he be out of the cash for putting up a bond.Yes, "because" he doesn't have nearly a half billion dollars in cash to pay, and would have to sell properties just to appeal a ruling. Even if he were to win the appeal and not end up having to pay anything, whatever property he sold to get the money would still be gone.
People often pay bondsmen to put up the money.Yes, "because" he doesn't have nearly a half billion dollars in cash to pay, and would have to sell properties just to appeal a ruling. Even if he were to win the appeal and not end up having to pay anything, whatever property he sold to get the money would still be gone.
Yes, "because" he doesn't have nearly a half billion dollars in cash to pay, and would have to sell properties just to appeal a ruling. Even if he were to win the appeal and not end up having to pay anything, whatever property he sold to get the money would still be gone.
There is a possibility, just a small one, that he managed to contact OVER THIRTY DIFFERENT BOND COMPANIES and they all said 'no'. He has been known to lie on the rare occasion.If Trump can’t come up with the money or collateral to cover the appeal the state can immediately start the process to seize assets. This will likely be cash in banks, stocks, and other easily sold items. Real estate will take longer since there is work to do with anyone who has a lien or ownership agreement, and these will have to be resolved. Most likely it’s a matter of finding buyers for Trump’s stake. New York can also seize property out of state. Once they file a lien Trump could still sell his stake in a property but the money would go to anyone else with a claim against him.
I’m a bit surprised that no one has agreed to help him. It’s also concerning since Trump might get more desperate and be willing to promise anything.
Why?I’m a bit surprised that no one has agreed to help him.
Because it is a chance to own a guy who leads in many polls for the presidency. Half a billion is nothing to Putin or MDS. It’s a gamble. If Trump lises tgey get nothing and Trump will get away with a swindle. Of course he would be a marked man.Why?
I’m sure the legal staff made a lot of calls. That he begging for donations and setting up fund raisers like Gulliani did shows it’s all bad news. Trump could file for personal bankruptcy. That will mean his assets will be assessed by the court and all debts paid. He owes 700 million that’s due in the next few years, and that will have to be paid, or assets set aside for it to be covered.There is a possibility, just a small one, that he managed to contact OVER THIRTY DIFFERENT BOND COMPANIES and they all said 'no'. He has been known to lie on the rare occasion.
This is an interesting trope. There is no election interference with these prosecutions. The primaries are proceeding as scheduled and the general election ought to occur on time as well. The election interference comes from state level MAGA Republicans through gerrymandering, purging voters, and making voting more difficult, and is expected come refusing to certify the election results they don't like.Anything to interfere in the election process
Not even. Just the MAGA conservatives, which are about half of Republican voters. Trump never did better than 50-60% of the primary votes when there were other Republicans still running, and even after Haley dropped out leaving Trump unopposed, still, in the last two primaries, some 15-20% of Republican primary voters voted for somebody other than Trump.how toxic Trump is. Only conservative voters want him.
Yes, "because" he doesn't have nearly a half billion dollars in cash to pay, and would have to sell properties just to appeal a ruling. Even if he were to win the appeal and not end up having to pay anything, whatever property he sold to get the money would still be gone.
I do not have much pity for Trump. The position that he is in right now is his own fault. He could still make it a lot more pain free by agreeing to sell off some properties to pay for his loss. It is his best bet. If he is given time to sell them, and allows his current overseer that power, they could take some time and possibly make some money from today's high values. If he is forced to sell them quickly he will lose a ton of money. I have to agree with @Laniakea to an extent. He will lose a lot if he is forced to sell on such a short notice. But he has one alternative that is not mentioned much. He can get out his deeds to enough properties to convince the judge that they would cover his costs. Again, since he is likely to lose the appeal, or have his money that he owes barely reduced, he will still have to come up with a lot of money quickly when the appeal is over and that would mean having those properties sold at fire sale rates.But if his conviction were overturned, he would have the cash proceeds from that sale. We're still only talking about a paper "loss" from selling in a hurry, but even that would be offset by the fact that the real estate market is generally up spectacularly right now.
As a counter-example:
Apparently, bail on a non-violent burglary charge is typically $10,000-$25,000. The average person with a burglary charge doesn't just have that kind of cash in their chequing account, so they're going to have to go to a bail bond place.
The typical cost for a bail bond is 10% of the bond's value, so someone charged with that kind of offense is going to be out $1,000 to $2,500 that they can't afford even if they're found not guilty... or they have the option of sitting in jail despite not being convicted of any crime.
I havs much more sympathy for those people than I do for someone who's 1) already been convicted and 2) would be only missing out on some of his hoped-for ROI, not actually taking a loss.
When you break the law sometimes there are negative consequences. Not always, not often enough, but sometimes.He will lose a lot if he is forced to sell on such a short notice.
Good news! Trump doesn't need to sell off any properties. He's announced publicly that he has more than enough ready cash to pay the whole amount.I do not have much pity for Trump. The position that he is in right now is his own fault. He could still make it a lot more pain free by agreeing to sell off some properties to pay for his loss. It is his best bet. If he is given time to sell them, and allows his current overseer that power, they could take some time and possibly make some money from today's high values. If he is forced to sell them quickly he will lose a ton of money. I have to agree with @Laniakea to an extent. He will lose a lot if he is forced to sell on such a short notice. But he has one alternative that is not mentioned much. He can get out his deeds to enough properties to convince the judge that they would cover his costs. Again, since he is likely to lose the appeal, or have his money that he owes barely reduced, he will still have to come up with a lot of money quickly when the appeal is over and that would mean having those properties sold at fire sale rates.
Trump has until Monday to make a deal of some sort. If he doesn't he will be out of time. Couldn't happen to a nicer fella!
Frabjous day! Callooh Callay!Good news! Trump doesn't need to sell off any properties. He's announced publicly that he has more than enough ready cash to pay the whole amount.
Trump Claims He Has Nearly $500 Million In Cash—As His Lawyers Insist He Can’t Pay NY Fraud Judgement
The statement marks a reversal from Trump’s statements Monday that he does not have the cash to pay the bond and can’t find any companies to secure it for him.www.forbes.com
Surprise, Surprise what he says one week is completely different than the next but hey if he could get away with a fib, all the good for him.Good news! Trump doesn't need to sell off any properties. He's announced publicly that he has more than enough ready cash to pay the whole amount.
Trump Claims He Has Nearly $500 Million In Cash—As His Lawyers Insist He Can’t Pay NY Fraud Judgement
The statement marks a reversal from Trump’s statements Monday that he does not have the cash to pay the bond and can’t find any companies to secure it for him.www.forbes.com
Surprise, Surprise what he says one week is completely different than the next but hey if he could get away with a fib, all the good for him.
Well Trump isn't paying them in any case.I would hope that they're being well-paid to put up with this crap, but I have a feeling that Trump will stiff them on their bills, too. Hopefully they got paid a healthy retainer up front to take the case.
I would hope that they're being well-paid to put up with this crap, but I have a feeling that Trump will stiff them on their bills, too. Hopefully they got paid a healthy retainer up front to take the case.