This has been one of the most entertaining weeks I had in a long time. Every time I think they're done with the nonsense, someone thinks of something else. It's better than going to a stand up comedy
Those women need to get a life.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yes I agree, I think these women want a life where the human right to bodily autonomy is respected.Those women need to get a life.
And I can go on and on and on about the many programs that don't directly benefit the majority but do benefit society as a whole, including LGBT rights.I pointed out that the program focused on LGBT issues and gender issues, rather than American citizens as a whole.
You and other conservatives are the only ones who do that.so focusing on their social life only is insufficient.
I don't see any danger for their bodily autonomy, but if they do and not having sex with their spouse is the way to accomplish that, I just fell sorry for the poor dude who lives with them. On the positive side, if they don't have sex they won't reproduce and their IQ won't be passed on.Yes I agree, I think these women want a life where the human right to bodily autonomy is respected.
45% of voting Latinos went for Mango Mussolini. They will be the next ones thrown under the bus when he starts deporting their families. Trump has said he will deport children born in the US to undocumented migrants. Do you think Trump will be bothered by the fact the the US Constitution says those children are US citizens?And yet he stands for actually not allowing that. Last time he even considered making it so we are stuck with what's on our birth certificate, no changing it on anything.
And let's be realistic, Trump says a lot of things but does something else. This is because he knows his supporters will eat up whatever lies he fabricates and he's only in it for himself.
Women couldn't vote in the US until 1920.Most people aren't handicapped but accommodating this group benefits us all.
And who gives a crap about the majority? At one time the majority felt women should totally be submissive to their husband amd black people shoukd be slaves and know their place.
And more bad points?
I don't see any danger for their bodily autonomy, but if they do and not having sex with their spouse is the way to accomplish that, I just fell sorry for the poor dude who lives with them. On the positive side, if they don't have sex they won't reproduce and their IQ won't be passed on.
No. I feel bad for a guy whose wife doesn't want to have sex with him because the majority of the population elected someone she doesn't like. Guess what? The result of the election is not going to change. The health of their relationship might.To clarify, you are saying you feel bad for a guy who puts his spouse's bodily autonomy in danger so that she refuses to have sex with him?
Yes, this is beyond silly.They're only making themselves suffer because of their resentment (unless this is just a bizarre way for them to come out as lesbian), so this is really hilarious. Plenty of other women out there, the vast majority in fact. Lol.
It's selective outrage. When he was President before, the only thing that was really different for me was that the economy was better.Sad, but true.
For the record ...there are also women who have been in menopause for years...among dem voters.To clarify, you are saying you feel bad for a guy who puts his spouse's bodily autonomy in danger because she refuses to have sex with him?
No. I feel bad for a guy whose wife doesn't want to have sex with him because the majority of the population elected someone she doesn't like. Guess what? The result of the election is not going to change. The health of their relationship might.
For the record ...there are also women who have been in menopause for years...among dem voters.
Someone please tell them they can't gey pregnant...even if they have unprotected sex.
It's selective outrage. When he was President before, the only thing that was really different for me was that the economy was better.
Just out of curiosity, what exactly was the medical support they had before but now lost?Thanks for the clarification! That makes more sense.
The danger to bodily autonomy is real; if a women has less of an ability to aquire medical help related to reproduction, it stands to reason she may not want to have sex. Hopefully, her spouse recognizes and respects that.
For the record, I don't think withholding sex will be an effective thing from a protest standpoint in this case, unless a majority of women do so. I see that as unlikely. The practical thing is for those women who are fearful about pregnancy without medical support.
Well, I'm a small retail business owner. Been in business 32 years. Seen a lot of changes throughout these years. The best economy during my time in business were the Clinton years. 2nd was the Trump years. BTW, I'm not republican, I'm an independent. As to the second part of your question? That's something each person has to decide for themselves.In what way? And, should one vote for a President just based on economic perspectives?
Just out of curiosity, what exactly was the medical support they had before but now lost?
Well, I'm a small retail business owner. Been in business 32 years. Seen a lot of changes throughout these years. The best economy during my time in business were the Clinton years. 2nd was the Trump years. BTW, I'm not republican, I'm an independent.
As to the second part of your question? That's something each person has to decide for themselves.
Not really. This is something that happens every administration. If the economy is good his opponents say it's because of his predecessor where his supporters say it's because of him.Have you considered your success during Trump's years was due to Obama's economic gaigains?
As an outdoorsman, I'm certainly against a polluted environment and hope we will do better going forward for all our sakes. Loss of civil rights? I didn't see that in his first 4 years. I'm sure you'll disagree. That's fine. But in these last four years there was a lot of internet censorship that wasn't there before. For instance, I had to be careful not to even say the word Covid on my podcast lest my video get taken down, unless of course I was praising the pharmaceutical companies. Not saying who was right, but that's not free speech, of which I am an advocate.I think it's important for everyone. A good economy is no excuse for a polluted environment and loss of civil rights.
Only Liberal men will suffer, since the conservative women remain the same, for their men. This may unknowingly lure more liberal men to become conservative men; where the girls are. The cause and effect shows just how organic the MAGA movement is. 4B also means less abortion. Abortion made more sense when liberal women do the opposite.Another good reason why voting for Trump wasn't a good way to help with men's issues.