Trump Puts Women Off Sex. Surprise

[Kathryn]

Projection.

Whatever you think.

 

[Kathryn]

I don't see it either.

It was there. I am, disinclined to look it back up and repost the information.

 

[Kathryn]

I have a "kindly old doctor."

I said "generally" and I already gave the link so I won't again.

 

[Kathryn]

That's why it should be left to the individuals involved.

Except for one.

 

[Estro Felino]

In know that here in the US, 1 in 4 women have experienced some sort of sexual violence. Of those, only 20% go to the police. (Indeed, none of the women I personally know to have been raped ever went to the cops.) Of the police reports that actually have been filed, only 30-40% result in an arrest, and of those arrests, only about 25% go on to be prosecuted. And finally, of those which are prosecuted, only 10-20% result in a conviction.

That's just HORRENDOUS. It means that only about 0.15% of women who experience sexual violence will see their perpetrator convicted.

Some sort of sexual violence is a very broad term.
Considering that sexual harassment is considered when a man tries to seduce a woman with insistence.

But when a woman courts a man with insistence, they will say it's fine. Like this girl hitting on this guy.

That would be called sexual harassment if the one singing had been the man.

 

[IndigoChild5559]

Some sort of sexual violence is a very broad term.

OMG. I can't believe you are still trying to defend your gaslighting.

Considering that sexual harassment is considered when a man tries to seduce a woman with insistence.

No one, NO ONE, thinks seduction is sexual violence. In fact, no one even says that sexual harassment is sexual violence. Go get a dictionary, and look up what the word violence means.

I give up. You are a lost cause, and part of the problem. Stick a fork in me, I'm done.

 

[Estro Felino]

OMG. I can't believe you are still trying to defend your gaslighting.

No one, NO ONE, thinks seduction is sexual violence. In fact, no one even says that sexual harassment is sexual violence. Go get a dictionary, and look up what the word violence means.

I give up. You are a lost cause, and part of the problem. Stick a fork in me, I'm done.

No...there's a misunderstanding here because I am so confused.
This "sex strike" (I mean...I need to call a spade a spade) makes no sense to me. The Politicians couldn't care less about that.
The people these women are punishing are themselves (because, let's be honest, men can have sex with other women... especially on a trip in Europe which is filled with sexually disinhibited girls).

Whom do they want to punish, then?

 

[SkepticThinker]

Whatever you think.

Thanks for letting me know I'm allowed to think what I think. Whew!

 

[SkepticThinker]

It was there. I am, disinclined to look it back up and repost the information.

That sounds like a good idea since nobody seems to have seen it.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Except for one.

The "one" you want to have a say, doesn't have the ability to have a say.
The "one" who does have the ability to say, is the born, fully grown and developed independent person in which the embryo/fetus resides.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Some sort of sexual violence is a very broad term.
Considering that sexual harassment is considered when a man tries to seduce a woman with insistence.

But when a woman courts a man with insistence, they will say it's fine. Like this girl hitting on this guy.

That would be called sexual harassment if the one singing had been the man.

Please don't start with this nonsense again.

 

[Kathryn]

The "one" you want to have a say, doesn't have the ability to have a say.
The "one" who does have the ability to say, is the born, fully grown and developed independent person in which the embryo/fetus resides.

Like I said, pregnancy is unique. Look, you won't convince me and I won't convince you so we should probably drop it

 

[Kathryn]

That sounds like a good idea since nobody seems to have seen it.

You and one other person. Nope, not going to repost it.