Anthem
Active Member
You touch my panties I'll break your arm.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Trump supporter says groping no big deal. Daughters nod in agreement.
- Thread starter Father Heathen
- Start date
I just want people to understand what it is Kavanaugh is accused of. And I want people to understand he is not being accused of “groping”.
I don’t know if he is guilty or not. But if we are going to talk about the accusation we should at least know what the allegation is.
Accordingly to Ford either Kavanaugh or Mike Judge pushed her into a bedroom. Kavanaugh pushes her down on the bed. One one them turned up the music so no one would hear them. Kavanaugh covered her mouth to stop her from screaming. She thought she might suffocate from this. And Kavsnaugh tried to rip her clothes off.
Now it is important to remember this is only her word that this happened. But at the same time you can’t categorize this as harmless groping. You can’t say this is no big deal.
Without viewing the video, it appears to be about one person.
But the OP generalizes it to all Trump supporters.
If this tactic is cromulent, then would finding one hideous Trump
or Kavanaugh detractor thereby color all who oppose either?
Disclaimer:
Read a few posts & was inspired to skip the rest.
So my post is ignorant of subsequent commentary....except
for the one about touching panties. That one called to me.
Last edited:
If you touch mine I'll just say "no".
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
How did you come to that conclusion?
Anthem
Active Member
I thought you were a man
A poor excuse for one.
By misreading the thread's title.
I saw plural when you had singular.
Sorry 'bout that.
Of course.
Although I think that, at least when looking at the whole of society (particularly the hard-partying, hedonistic side), there are clearly mixed messages on this issue.
New hashtag in response to #metoo appers to be #sowhat?
I don't know anything about it. I don't even recognize the name.
Missing the point entirely...
The point was that the, "this is bad so let's point it out", is largely irrelevant because it was what anyone with common decency was doing in the first place. I was mocking the leftist jihadi's, nothing more. It's obvious that Poe's Law came into effect somewhere around the first post of the thread.
I'm not interested in the #MeToo, but that is far from affirming the actions of the real offenders. I'm just not in support of all the unconfirmed allegations, and the weaponized nature of the thing. Of course, I should have known better than to think a liberal or two could sort out an obviously hyperbolic statement or two. Meh, live and learn.
Woberts
The Perfumed Seneschal
Yeah, liberals are the prudes.
Yeah, I already have a religion, thanks.
But, anyone it's refreshing to see someone not duped and able to grasp that I was sarcastically mocking the whole thing throughout the thread. All witch hunts are the tools of the tyrants and murderers, it doesn't even matter of their cause was justified in principle it's what is done with it. Hitler thought he was saving his country from greedy Jewish bankers by murdering Jews by the millions. That's the logical conclusion of the whole thing. Anyone we don't like will become a "groper" and the inquisition will begin. That's why I'm not interested at all in that nonsense -- people are being falsely accused and harmed. It doesn't matter if people who like each other or aren't emotionally sensitive are playing a little grab *** to amuse themselves.Fun fact, women are more likely to put their hands on someone inappropriately than men. (Since men generally have it feared into them by their guardians not to do this from birth.) I don't excuse it either way, but if you ask my wife who has been grabbed more she'll laugh and point at me.
Woberts
The Perfumed Seneschal
Aha!Yeah, I already have a religion, thanks.
Fun fact, women are more likely to put their hands on someone inappropriately than men. (Since men generally have it feared into them by their guardians not to do this from birth.) I don't excuse it either way, but if you ask my wife who has been grabbed more she'll laugh and point at me.
I knew someone would bring up Hitler, just not when.
Godwin's Law, and all that.
Aha!
I knew someone would bring up Hitler, just not when.
Godwin's Law, and all that.
Hitler is interesting, far more interesting then Liberalism. Liberalism is just a reboot of his methodology in the context of social justice, or whatever nonsense they decide to go into next. Of course, they themselves are excused from these standards and scrutiny and anything done to the "baddies" is justified. It doesn't matter if they are becoming the "baddies" themselves through the actions. That will be excused, because "I punched nazi" or "I got that X". None of them really realize how close they are to the nature of something like the Spanish Inquisition, or Hitler's regime itself. The baddies are apparently white men, especially if they're conservative or libertarian.
Politically, I'm a me -- a free individual, though I confess that Trump amuses me greatly. Marrying oneself to a political ideology is for the sheep. Not interested.
So, men can wear panties if they want to. I will defend with my life @Revoltingest ’s right to wear whatever he wants under his kilt.
And I absolutely pledge never to touch whatever it is.
Woberts
The Perfumed Seneschal
Wut? You clearly have no idea what liberalism is.
And do you think the behavior of the Democratic Senators was any better? Is their behavior suitable, desirable, or appropriate for someone of the Senate?
Yeah, I do. Though, we probably need to quantify what it is on paper verses what it is in practice. They're not related at all. There is "liberal" as in "likes equality, social structure, and tolerance" and "liberal" that is nothing more than religious zealotry attempting to jam itself down everyone's throats.
Essentially, it's the difference of building ramps to help a handicap person into a building, versus seeing those who have legs needing them removed to make it fair.
I miss classical liberalism really, if that was still a thing.