YmirGF
Bodhisattva in Recovery
If you are meaning, who did have a mandate to enter into the agreement, the answer is overwhelmingly, congress.Who do you think did?
Tom
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If you are meaning, who did have a mandate to enter into the agreement, the answer is overwhelmingly, congress.Who do you think did?
Tom
Aside from those two countries, who do you think Trump "strengthened relationships " with?Aside from strengthening relations with the two most powerful countries in the Middle East, of course. (Saudi Arabia and Israel.)
I don't think you understand the USA very well. That's not surprising since you don't live here.If you are meaning, who did have a mandate to enter into the agreement, the answer is overwhelmingly, congress.
Jeeez, Tom. I haven't done a roll call at the UN for a few days, so it's hard to say. Is going against weak leaders with weak negotiating skills necessarily a bad thing though?Aside from those two countries, who do you think Trump "strengthened relationships " with?
He weakened them with an awful lot of people, from Germany to Australia to Egypt.
Tom
Tom, I understand this quite well. POTUS does have the right to negotiate with foreign powers on their own. That is understood. However, on very important issues, in recent decades, POTUS normally seeks and receives a seal of approval from congress. That way, no one can accuse them of acting unilaterally and they can crow that they truly represent the "will of the people". Obama did an end game around congress because he knew he would have been laughed out of the room. Heck, even the illustrious Chuck Schumer was against the fricken deal.I don't think you understand the USA very well. That's not surprising since you don't live here.
The President is intended to be the voice of the nation to the rest of the world.
Tom
I agree that we should be working towards more cooperation.Agreed. But it doesn't have to be one or the other, as I see it.
Improving the relationship with Iran, in general, is much more productive than expecting Iran not to get armed to teeth with nuclear bombs. And yes, I understand that breaking this deal didn't work towards improving this relationship, but I sincerely believe that it is still doable... as long as politicians don't act stupid...
It's coming along.By the way, how is your fallout shelter doing ?
Aye.That's quite the problem, isn't it ?
Congress made it their stated goal to oppose anything that the President did. No matter what.However, on very important issues, in recent decades, POTUS normally seeks and receives a seal of approval from congress.
Have it your way, Tom.Congress made it their stated goal to oppose anything that the President did. No matter what.
Was Obama's deal better than his predecessor's? George W Bush didn't have anything. Trump doesn't either.
At least Bush had a compliant and partisan Capitol Hill. He didn't do any better. Quite the opposite, Obama was trying to clean up the Bush mess while Congress opposed anything and everything Obama did.
Tom
I would like to.Have it your way, Tom.
Don't forget that Hillary was threatening Iran during the campaign.I would like to.
Have peace, that is.
Trump and his Deplorables want something else. And you'll probably get it. I know what this country is like. Especially when the Republicans hold every government agency.
Tom
If Iran attacked Israel.Don't forget that Hillary was threatening Iran during the campaign.
Not just war, but to "obliterate" it.
So by voting for her, you out deplorabled even me.
Well, most Americans see it differently. We didn't seem so dangerous when freeing Europe from Hitler, the Baltics from Communists and the ME from ISIS. Or maybe they "wouldn't" have us get involved.Dangerous to other countries like Iran.
Me being able to post is utterly irrelevant.
Tom
There are reasons for my common harping on the history between Iran and the USA.
From toppling their democracy to launching a devastating invasion to putting them on the Axis of Evil hitlist and start to invade it, the USA has given Iran VERY good reasons to get a nuclear deterrent.
What the deal, such as it was, did was give the USA about 10 years to demonstrate that it was no longer the violent and rapacious sworn enemy that WE have thoroughly demonstrated ourselves to be. Then Iran would not have such a need to defend itself from us!
That is the only true path to peace, and Trump just jumped the rails.
Tom
Emphasis on "best deal". ROTFLIf Iran attacked Israel.
But she doesn't matter any more. You Deplorables got your Commander in Chief.
Now explain to me why Trump is angling towards another war in the Middle East. He's pulling out of the best deal the USA could make with their victims. Better than Bush, obviously.
Now what?
I think that this is why, among other things, that Trump lost the election. Ya know, the democratic one.
Tom
Well, guess you have changed because I rank you 40% left of centerYa know, your cheap shots are just so pathetic, but I'll answer your question anyway.
At the end of each semester, I had the students fill out confidential surveys, and one of the questions I asked was what political affiliation, if any, did they think I had? The results for years came back a relatively even split between Democratic, Republican, and Don't Know. Then most of the time they'd ask me which is the correct answer, and I told them that I couldn't divulge that because of my need to keep objectivity.
BTW, I previously posted here that I felt that Obama also should have gotten Congressional approval, so your accusation of partisanship on my part that you're accusing me of seems to be more a matter of your own "projection".
Do they?Well, most Americans see it differently.
I totally agree.I'm sure our money and man power could be used more at home. Works for me.
I agree that we should be working towards more cooperation.
The first step (one never taken) would be to apologize for some things...
- The 1953 coup
- The Iran-Iraq war
- Shooting down Iran Air flight 655.
This would go a long way towards building useful trust.
It's coming along.
The structural work is done, & now the wiring is being installed.
Aye.
Actually not very much, but what you don't seem to understand is that when I taught, I taught "political science", not my opinions. It's called "professionalism", esmith.Well, guess you have changed because I rank you 40% left of center
She didn't threaten just defense.If Iran attacked Israel.
Hillary lost too, having not even collected half of the popular votes.But she doesn't matter any more. You Deplorables got your Commander in Chief.
Now explain to me why Trump is angling towards another war in the Middle East.
I think that this is why, among other things, that Trump lost the election. Ya know, the democratic one.