Laniakea
Not of this world
Nice try. (sarcasm there)The person that made it political was Trump. Or did you miss that? He made it political from day one.
Got any evidence to try backing up your false claim?
No? I didn't think so.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Nice try. (sarcasm there)The person that made it political was Trump. Or did you miss that? He made it political from day one.
A few dozen women have accused Trump of various degrees of sexual assault since the ‘70s. His being in the spotlight does make it more difficult for them to be intimidated, though.If Trump had never ran for president no woman would have came forward IMO
I have endless evidence. Didn't you hear Trump lying about the case every single day of the trial? Do I really need to quote and link such examples?Nice try. (sarcasm there)
Got any evidence to try backing up your false claim?
No? I didn't think so.
The Me Too movement also made it easier for women that were victims to come forward. In the past they were often shamed into silence.A few dozen women have accused Trump of various degrees of sexual assault since the ‘70s. His being in the spotlight does make it more difficult for them to be intimidated, though.
Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't trump's comments before/after the hearing relate to politics too?Robert De Niro headlines bizarre Biden campaign presser outside Trump trial: ‘You’re a f–king idiot’
Oscar-winning actor Robert De Niro became the face of the Biden campaign Tuesday, fronting a tumultuous press conference outside the Manhattan courthouse where former President Donald Trump’s…nypost.com
Nothing says, "This is political" like the president of the United States sending a democrat activist to Trump's court trial (along with a few exploited Capitol cops) just as the jury is hearing closing arguments.
Apparently not.Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't trump's comments before/after the hearing relate to politics too?
As would any sane people. Journalists do their part. Of course few right wing pundits have any journalism experience.In reality the left has done just about everything they can to get rid of Trump.
Trump claims…….Short of trying to kill him, though Trump claims they were going to.
Yup, Trump should have stayed a reality tv host. LIf Trump had never ran for president those women wouldn't have came forward IMO.(that's when they started coming foward)
It’s a pretty small issue given his serious crimes. LNow if it was about justice or money, they would have came foward before IMO.
Heck even Trump likes to sue as a way to harass people. I’m not sure he’s won a lawsuit except against Stormy.Hell maybe publicit, getting back into the spotlight had a little something to do with it.
It sure got them.publicity and put them into the spotlight again.
As would any sane people. Journalists do their part. Of course few right wing pundits have any journalism experience.
Trump claims…….
Yup, Trump should have stayed a reality tv host. L
It’s a pretty small issue given his serious crimes. L
Heck even Trump likes to sue as a way to harass people. I’m not sure he’s won a lawsuit except against Stormy.
That was one of Trump's extremely stupid lies. And yet foolish people fall for it. Do you know what "boiler plate" legalese is? It is the legal material that most of us ignore. For example when people sign up for YouTube. Or any other similar site where you have to agree that you will not sue them. That is the long document that you probably scrolled past and then clicked "Agreed". It is standard legal language that all sorts of documents have that people ignore. The FBI has boiler plate on its search warrants. They always say that resistance could lead to death. That does not mean that the FBI is trying to kill everyone that they arrest. When it came to searching Mar a Lago they did not want to confront Trump at all. They did not want the possible troubles that he could have caused so they purposefully scheduled the raid when they knew that he was out of town. It is pretty hard to kill someone that you know will not be there.Short of trying to kill him, though Trump claims they were going to.
That was one of Trump's extremely stupid lies. And yet foolish people fall for it. Do you know what "boiler plate" legalese is? It is the legal material that most of us ignore. For example when people sign up for YouTube. Or any other similar site where you have to agree that you will not sue them. That is the long document that you probably scrolled past and then clicked "Agreed". It is standard legal language that all sorts of documents have that people ignore. The FBI has boiler plate on its search warrants. They always say that resistance could lead to death. That does not mean that the FBI is trying to kill everyone that they arrest. When it came to searching Mar a Lago they did not want to confront Trump at all. They did not want the possible troubles that he could have caused so they purposefully scheduled the raid when they knew that he was out of town. It is pretty hard to kill someone that you know will not be there.
Technically they were authorized to use deadly force if necessary. The warrant even said so. Its standard.
Is Trump over playing it? Definetly.
Warrants for the homes of Biden and Pence I assume said "may use deadly force when necessary"
It was political the moment Trump tried to silence Daniels to interfere with the election, used campaign money for it and tried to hide the fact. It was a political crime.Nice try. (sarcasm there)
Got any evidence to try backing up your false claim?
No? I didn't think so.
Not just the left, look at how many conservatives oppose Trump. Liz Cheney. Bill Crystol. Tim Miller. Comey. Nicolle Wallace. Chris Christie. Ann Coulter. Sarah Longwell. Just to name a few. Liberals and ethical conservatives see it as a duty to make sure Trump is not elected.Its became a persnol goal to the left.
No, because Trump is disturbed, has few actual policies, poses a national security threat, and is under 3 indictments, with a jury deliberating on his first criminal trial.Fueled by mostly hate.
Trump was never fit for office.It even all started before their golden child Hillary lost.
The way that you posted that indicated otherwise. You may have pointed it out but when you are telling of an obvious lie of Trump's you need to make it clear that it was one due to conservative TDS. You may have to do the same thing with Biden's lies,, they are far fewer in number, but yes he lies too at times.Tell me something I don't aleady know and already pointed out.
If it was a crime, Daniels should have been arrested for accepting the money. If not that, then for breaking the contract she accepted the money for.It was political the moment Trump tried to silence Daniels to interfere with the election, used campaign money for it and tried to hide the fact. It was a political crime.
The evidence for all that has been laid out in the trial.
Whether the evidence is strong enough to convict him is currently deliberated. I expect a "guilty" verdict within the next few days.
He fit right into the Oval Office for 4 years just fine.Trump was never fit for office.
Let's see that "endless evidence" of yours.I have endless evidence. Didn't you hear Trump lying about the case every single day of the trial? Do I really need to quote and link such examples?
Why didn't you tell everyone that you did not pay any attention to the trial at all?
Make me!Get the <bleep> out of this forum and into the correct sub-forum.
Fear mongering has always been a leftist tactic.Focusing on January 6th is precisely about whether we'll have a sovereign country after 4 more years of Trump. That's the entire point of it. Look what he already tried to do. What will he do next time?
I'm not the one who wrote all the headlines for the many individual LEFT wing news sources that reported that it was the Joe bite me campaign that sent De Niro there.You’re saying that De Niro expressing his views outside the court ‘proves’ this trial is politically motivated?
Could you explain, step by step, how you arrived at that conclusion?
You could start with the initial arraignment and charges, why they are not actually charges relating to infractions of the law but something to do with politics, and go from there.
Thanks for participating in the discussion.The news organisations paid off Stormy Daniels?
What is it that you think this actually means? The ‘presser’ retrospectively put Trump on trial?