Copernicus
Industrial Strength Linguist
I accidentally misstated your position by saying "liberals" where you said "politicians", so I went back and corrected the typo in my original post. I still think it valid to ask why you made that generalization in response to a statement about Trump alone. It is the kind of generalization that we hear from Trump himself--that the other side is crooked, so... (He never admits that he is, but the idea is that payback is fair.)
Trump engages in an unusual amount of personal attacks on everyone he thinks of as an enemy of any kind. It is childish behavior, regardless why he does it. It is one of the things that makes it unsuitable for him to be president.
Yes, they are attacking him on personal issues, albeit less frequently and less viciously. Outside of a few fairly harmless jibes (like obsession with hand size and crowd size), they can actually point to things that are true and in the public record about his personal conduct--disregard for rules and laws, deliberate lies, threats of violence, urging followers to break the law, petty grifting). If you are trying to make an equivalence here, it is pretty obviously a false one. Harris and Walz don't behave this way habitually towards a large number of perceived enemies. They don't make up a lot of demeaning names for him and others. They spend a lot more time talking about substantive issues regarding Trump's record, politics, and government policies.
You do criticize Republicans and Trump occasionally, but far more rarely and less enthusiastically than you criticize Democrats and liberals. You tend to promote a lot of Republican talking points and almost none of the Democratic ones. You don't have to be a MAGA zealot to be a party loyalist. You just have to regularly promote the interests of one of the two major parties. That doesn't mean that you automatically believe everything in the party platform, but don't pretend that you have no political biases.
