Woberts
The Perfumed Seneschal
And why does that matter?Are you kidding me?
https://www.usnews.com/news/article...ty-leader-voted-for-sanders-will-back-clinton
He's worse.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And why does that matter?Are you kidding me?
https://www.usnews.com/news/article...ty-leader-voted-for-sanders-will-back-clinton
He's worse.
Same reason David Duke matters apparently.And why does that matter?
You brought it up first, so I was wondering if you had a reason to.Same reason David Duke matters apparently.
Yeah. They were explicit as to why they were voting since they didn't run their own candidate since the 80s and mentiond the similarities and likenesses of the philosophy of Communists with Democrats that's Sanders held through his own political ideals and views.You brought it up first, so I was wondering if you had a reason to.
Trump first, you mean.He seems to be frank, strong & decisive in contradistinction to many other presidents.
He believes and acts for "USA first.
No we don't.Anyway, the USA has got the President that it voted for in a majority of votes,
Yeah, he's just an ex-Klan Grand Wizard and white supremacist who thought Trump was great for his movement and promoted him. That's not as bad, right?
The world is going to ****. Thanks for the reminder with your surreal reply.
What I was doing is pointing out your hypocrisy by you trying to paint Sanders and the Dems as a bunch of wild eyed dangerous extremists due to a communist saying he voted for him. But you awkwardly brush off the fact that Trump has plenty of extremists who voted for him. There's fringe people supporting candidates from both parties but you want to ignore the Republican loons. Too inconvenient for you? You also seem to think communism is worse than white supremacy. Your "who cares" attitude towards it is kind of offensive.So was Larry Byrd , Hillary Clinton's mentor who you conveniently left out like that doesn't matter, but somehow David Duke does.
Perhaps it's better to put it in terms that David Duke didn't have any established political party outside the Democrats and Republicans and put their own candidates on the ballot as it is with the Communist Party of the USA, by which its leadership willingly backs Sanders as someone who actively shares communist ideologies and likely would use the power of government to bring it about.
David Duke is irrelevant because his words don't carry any real weight, nor does he have anything active of his own going on like creating a political party of the Confederacy, and later endorse the Republicans as they got behind Trump.
The Communist Party does have real weight, and clearly is a major player on the world stage.
What would be surreal to me would be ignoring that.
Perhaps it's better to put it in terms that David Duke didn't have any established political party outside the Democrats and Republicans and put their own candidates on the ballot as it is with the Communist Party of the USA.
which its leadership willingly backs Sanders as someone who actively shares communist ideologies and likely would use the power of government to bring it about.
The Communist Party does have real weight, and clearly is a major player on the world stage.
What would be surreal to me would be ignoring that.
What I was doing is pointing out your hypocrisy by you trying to paint Sanders and the Dems as a bunch of wild eyed dangerous extremists due to a communist saying he voted for him. But you awkwardly brush off the fact that Trump has plenty of extremists who voted for him. There's fringe people supporting candidates from both parties but you want to ignore the Republican loons. Too inconvenient for you? You also seem to think communism is worse than white supremacy. Your "who cares" attitude towards it is kind of offensive.
No, the Communist Party in America is not a "major player in the world stage". What la-la land are you living in? They're a fringe group with no hope of success.
I'm talking about the Communist movement in America. It's not a major player here. By the way, your whole post can be turned around against you since white supremacy has been embrace by entire governments around the world. You need to think your posts through more.Actually I put, communism on the same level as any fringe elements out there including supremacist groups.
You need to educate yourself to the fact that communism is a major player on the world stage as it is an active and extremely dangerous political ideology that has been embraced by entire governments. If you want to think it's La La Land and non-existent or irrelevant, go right ahead and swim in your own particular ignorance or denial.
Whichever may apply.
Take your pick.
Why? Is there a party of the Confederacy outside of Democrats and Republicans?I'm talking about the Communist movement in America. It's not a major player here. By the way, your whole post can be turned around against you since white supremacy has been embrace by entire governments around the world. You need to think your posts through more.
List of neo-Nazi organizations - WikipediaWhy? Is there a party of the Confederacy outside of Democrats and Republicans?
Are they a recognized and registered Party in the USA like the Communists?
I'm not sure why you think that's so important. There's dozens and dozens of small third parties in America that are registered but hold no power and don't have a hope to. I didn't mention one group in particular, either. You seem to have ignored @Laika 's post about how little reach they have, as well.Are they a recognized and registered Party in the USA like the Communists?
He seems to be frank, strong & decisive in contradistinction to many other presidents.
He believes and acts for "USA first.
What we have is the product of an appointment system designed to protect the interests of the very rich and disenfranchise the rest.
Tom
Fair enough........ so the USA has a rubbish electoral system. What can I say?No we don't.
Clinton won by millions of votes.
What we have is the product of an appointment system designed to protect the interests of the very rich and disenfranchise the rest.
Tom
They're a fringe group with no hope of success.
Realistically, we're probably somewhere in between those two extremes. Leaning towards "world power", but that's worldwide. In America, we're leaning hard to the "no power" area.The Communist Party does have real weight, and clearly is a major player on the world stage.