• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trump will end abortion

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
It's relevant because he wants to get more pro-lifers in and pass an anti-later-term abortion bill. I am against these things since I believe very strongly that a woman has full right to choose up until the point that the fetus would be able to survive outside the womb without medical intervention. I absolutely love Planned Parenthood, I wish it got even more funding, but that wasn't the point I was addressing.
Some of us live our entire lives unable to live outside the womb without medical intervention.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
Some of us live our entire lives unable to live outside the womb without medical intervention.
Well there's medical intervention keeping people alive and then there's a very early stage of development for a fetus. Neither are entirely interchangeable.
 

tytlyf

Not Religious
PP doesn't receive tax dollars for abortions. That's illegal. Most people are against late term abortions, unless there is a good reason/emergency. Then you have republicans who want 12 year old rape survivors to not be able to have an abortion.

The problem with conservatives is that their abortion stance is religiously motivated. America is a secular nation governed by a secular constitution. Religion has no place in politics or government. But that doesn't stop the republican politicians from playing the religion card for votes.
 

Maponos

Welcome to the Opera
Desecration of life is desecration of life, no matter how you try to spin it. I'm against all abortion unless it's dire circumstances (incest, rape or could endanger the mother's life).
 
Last edited:

Nietzsche

The Last Prussian
Premium Member
Desecration of life is desecration of life, no matter how you try to spin it. I'm against all abortion unless its dire circumstances (incest, rape or could endanger the mother's life).
This deification of life continues to puzzle me. Life is horrible. why would you encourage it?
 

tytlyf

Not Religious
Clinton is no threat to gun rights. This is a distortion proffered by the Gun Industry solely to sell more guns and ammo. They did it with Obama and they're doing it again with Clinton. How horrible to deceive people like this.
Yep. The NRA is a disgrace to the country. GHWB was right to cancel his lifetime membership once they strayed. Just watch their panic mongering commercials on TV. Pure propaganda.

The NRA likes to scare the sheep so they run out and buy more guns and ammo.

LiveLeak-dot-com-2c0_1452621624-nra-hunting-cartoonjpg-18fa5335e8c51714_1452621630.jpg
 

tytlyf

Not Religious
Is he going to take all the baby's unwanted and look after them lol.
He's going to make sure all the teenage girls who accidently get pregnant have their kids. Then they can struggle with poverty and finishing their education. Then they can get on public assistance to help with the burden. Sounds like a plan.
 

psychoslice

Veteran Member
He's going to make sure all the teenage girls who accidently get pregnant have their kids. Then they can struggle with poverty and finishing their education. Then they can get on public assistance to help with the burden. Sounds like a plan.
I don't think you could force that onto anyone, it would cause all sorts of problems, even murdering their baby's, if the abortion is done within a month or two there is no problem, it isn't a child at that age, it hasn't even developed a brain that thinks.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
You are kidding yourself.
Voting for anyone but Clinton is voting for Trump. And unless he is lying yet again, he will do his best to end RoeVWade.
Tom
How do you know you're not kidding yourself about Hillary's being better?
I still find it surprising that people can have such certainty about 2 such dicey choices.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Considering Trump has launched his promise to end abortions and defund Planned Parenthood, while Hillary has said nothing of ending gun ownership, this just isn't a question.
Often, what isn't said speaks loudly.
Look at Hilda's VP.
Both of them are anti-gun.
Abortion rights strike me as more durable than gun rights.
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
Often, what isn't said speaks loudly.
Look at Hilda's VP.
Both of them are anti-gun.
Abortion rights strike me as more durable than gun rights.
I wouldn't be comfortable assigning linear values, but gun rights are strong enough to the point where they aren't going anywhere. At least, I don't think so.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I wouldn't be comfortable assigning linear values, but gun rights are strong enough to the point where they aren't going anywhere. At least, I don't think so.
Reasonable people may disagree....with ignorant malevolent aliens!
 

Smart_Guy

...
Premium Member
Abortion reduction and management, I'm in favor of.

Banning abortion as if it's always 100% murder, I'm against.

I believe there are instances that abortion is needed, specially in case of life threatening risks when the mother agrees to get abortion.

If there is anything I perfectly agree to end, it is the problems that cause unneeded abortion, like rape and bad/neglected healthcare. That's what Trump should consider first if he really wants to make a change, and not just wanting to get more votes and supports by anti-abortion mobs.
 

Acim

Revelation all the time
I'm with him (Trump)

I don't see it having the profound impact some are anticipating, but can understand the desire to scare people into voting.

I also don't see this as strictly a religious/spiritual issue, or about as much as - please don't murder people is strictly a religious/spiritual issue.
 

Kapalika

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
This deification of life continues to puzzle me. Life is horrible. why would you encourage it?

I found this pretty hilarious and I had to stop from waking people up from laughing so hard when I saw someone gave you the "optimistic" rating xD

But really, I think the question should be "when can this organism have self-awareness and experience pain?" If you destroy the life before then... is it really any worse than killing a plant? I mean, the only reason people get up in arms is because we have an instinctual reaction based only on genetics. It's why we have more empathy for chimps than for cows even though both have self awareness and the ability to experience pain. If it was never self aware, it can't be a "person". To have personhood you have to have some type of awareness or consciousness. I've yet to see zygotes or fetuses with underdeveloped brains have either of those. That comes later in pregnancy though I'm not totally sure where.

For the record though, I am pro-choice. I just maybe the draw the line a little differently.
 
Top