The Emperor of Mankind
Currently the galaxy's spookiest paraplegic
It goes well beyond the electoral college.
No it really doesn't. Trump lost the popular ballot by roughly 3 million votes. It's the
Last edited:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It goes well beyond the electoral college.
If such a sentiment be true, which I imagine to some degree it is, then this says worse things about us as a nation than any pc/sjw overreach ever could.I think there is a lot of truth to this article. The anti-Trump brigade fails to appreciate that Trump was enabled by their over-reach and he was elected because a lot of people just wanted to see the anti-Trump people's heads explode. It worked. The rest is just an extended popcorn moment that keeps on going and going and going. You can almost smell the outrage and intellectual condescension.
This was a big factor in Trump's victory. This is just what I have been saying. Too many in the heartland are sick and tired of liberalism and sjw's running amok.What do you think about it?
Some of those organizations can get into an elitism mindset that fails to even be liberal. They can wear the label all they want, it sure fools a lot of folks.I couldn't vote for Trump because of his unprofessional style (to put it mildly) but I do have some anti-Democrat emotions because of these liberals and sjw's running amok. BLM rhetoric, anti-police attitudes, North Carolina bathroom brouhaha, etc., etc..
I am asking.From my observation the demographics of the people who made the largest voter impact on Trump election are people whose idea of "PC" are still sour over gay marriage being legalized outside of state vote. Not people of the age wondering whether or not college campuses think Milo is too much of an *** pimple to be invited to regurgitate his profoundly unenlightening drivel on their floors with official time slots. (Ask how I really feel).
Oh, I definitely agree, George. Definitely agree. How we both distill that might be interesting however.If such a sentiment be true, which I imagine to some degree it is, then this says worse things about us as a nation than any pc/sjw overreach ever could.
I think you tube willingly censors anything or everything now that dosent generate or threatens sufficient revenue, and/or appeals to its key upper managements own political or ideological liking. Imo.Video gets a lot of things wrong.
1) Youtube Censorship is not policing "thought crime". That's absurd
2) Youtube controlling what they think is acceptable on their website is not a violation of legal free speech, it's merely an establishment of standards of discourse.
3) The clip of anita sarkesian is blatantly cherrypicked to make a false point. The clip used is literally from Anita criticising herself. She used to see structures where there were not, and think things which were not actively sexist were. It was self-criticism.
If this were anything above hypersensitivity of the right, we would have actual examples of video removal.
But nope. Just conservatives whining.
Trump was never my first choice, but his strength and unfaltering perseverance in making his opinions and thoughts known was a sign of strength against an intrusive and forceful adversary who in the name of equality and tolerance, was clearly not either of those things when it came to opposition.This was a big factor in Trump's victory. This is just what I have been saying. Too many in the heartland are sick and tired of liberalism and sjw's running amok.
I couldn't vote for Trump because of his unprofessional style (to put it mildly) but I do have some anti-Democrat emotions because of these liberals and sjw's running amok. BLM rhetoric, anti-police attitudes, North Carolina bathroom brouhaha, etc., etc..
Trump was never my first choice, but his strength and unfaltering perseverance in making his opinions and thoughts known was a sign of strength against an intrusive and forceful adversary who in the name of equality and tolerance, was clearly not either of those things when it came to opposition.
The insane and inane P.C. culture isn't what won the Presidency, that is economics. A more nuanced understanding is that it is what disrupted the normal social conventions around acceptable behavior. The people who need to understand that they are no more morally superior than the "moral majority" will unfortunately never do so, the very idea of accepting introspection into their abhorrent behavior is anathema.What do you think about it?
I don't think it is unreasonable for a society to demand that the marketplace of ideas be open. While a backlash against authoritarian oversight might take a somewhat unreasonable form, the need for a backlash itself is not so and people will take the release valve they are offered from oppression.I agree with this in part, but I don't think it is all reasonable.
This is still a new change. Givin the way they are pulled forcing redirected search results, makes it very hard to find those videos. There are quite a number of people throughout the internet that testify this is actually the case. The latter, David Seaman being one of them.The only videos I see being removed are one's which blatantly violate the site (18+, child abuse, copyright, etc.)
Do you have any examples of videos being removed? Demonetization and/or changes in the algorithm aren't censorship.
I doubt that. It's exactly the direction society is headed.Then you need to go reread Orwell because the point of his works went over your head.
My sentiments exactly.From my observation the demographics of the people who made the largest voter impact on Trump election are people whose idea of "PC" are still sour over gay marriage being legalized outside of state vote. Not people of the age wondering whether or not college campuses think Milo is too much of an *** pimple to be invited to regurgitate his profoundly unenlightening drivel on their floors with official time slots. (Ask how I really feel).
In which case I am of the people who think the first three sentences of the article is more important than the rest of it.
Lots of people advocate for social justice.I've heard it here in Canada quite a fair share.
I always find it interesting that it is blamed on people who advocate social justice, rather than those who are hyper-reactionary to social justice.
A lot of this has manifested past the point of advocacy. It's already affected how media is used, the operation of the legal system and resulting legislation, and already created an intrusive effect on people who themselves otherwise do not share or care for those views being forced upon them.I always find it interesting that it is blamed on people who advocate social justice, rather than those who are hyper-reactionary to social justice.
Ya know.....I didn't think Trump's win had anything to do with SJWs & political correctness.A lot of this has manifested past the point of advocacy. It's already affected how media is used, the operation of the legal system and resulting legislation, and already created an intrusive effect on people who themselves otherwise do not share or care for those views being forced upon them.
Things involving hate speech, health, sexual orientation, various educational, and race related issues, all nobel causes in itself, but the SJW and PC problems arose once these things have been aggressively pursued well past its reasonable boundaries and sensibilities to a point of it being a type of "McCarthyism" using nanny state tactics.
There's an ongoing push back now to reign in this form of socially based extremism that already has gone well past its advocacy stage, before it gets anymore out of hand more than it already is.
People are just sick and tired of being railroaded and simply not putting up with it anymore.
Ya know.....I didn't think Trump's win had anything to do with SJWs & political correctness.
But more & more, it seems possibly a factor. Trump is the opposite of the PC culture...
...completely incompatible with it. Or maybe perfectly compatible in the sense that
he tweaks their noses, they respond loudly & badly, & he crushes their candidate.
In an unsatisfying world, that's somewhat satisfying.
Perhaps if people calling themselves advocates of social justice stopped being condescending racists and sexists, they wouldn't get blamed for backlash?I always find it interesting that it is blamed on people who advocate social justice, rather than those who are hyper-reactionary to social justice.