Basis for the claim?It might make logical sense but it’s not the legal standard.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Basis for the claim?It might make logical sense but it’s not the legal standard.
Yep. it sure is.Sometimes exigent circumstances speed
things up. This case is very time sensitive.
Well, if one wants Trump elected,Yep. it sure is.
No, the DC case is held up waiting for an immunity decision by the SCOTUS, and the Georgia case is held up with an appeal to remove Willis.My question is does this clear the track for Jack Smith to proceed in the D.C. case, or for Fani Willis to proceed in Georgia?
Constitutionally there is nothing stopping Republicans from moving the clock backwards and returning the decision for President in their states back to state legislators. The problem is that they would only be able to accomplish this in the reddest of states. So it would not make any difference. In any state close to being a swing state Republican control is too weak.No, the DC case is held up waiting for an immunity decision by the SCOTUS, and the Georgia case is held up with an appeal to remove Willis.
It's all been a total catastrophe of exploiting the legal system. SCOTUS seems to be covering for Trump, and Cannon is definately covering for Trump, trying to buy him time.
We will see what happens in the NY trial. And then it will come down to the voters in swing states. If Trump loses there is a risk of MAGAs pulling some dubious election count things in states with republican rule. And there's the threat of violence by Trump supporters, again.
Florida state law and my long and successful experience as a litigator. Don’t you think it’s telling that the prosecution didn’t move to disqualify the judge?Basis for the claim?
Based on what? She needs to make another bad ruling for there to be a move to have her removed. She knows what she is doing, and that's to avoid anything that can be challenged. She can't be removed for sitting on a case. And she's not tuling on motions before her so she can't be appealed. The system assumes judges will be ethical, but obviously the honor system did not foresee MAGA judges.Florida state law and my long and successful experience as a litigator. Don’t you think it’s telling that the prosecution didn’t move to disqualify the judge?
I think you watch too much TV.Based on what? She needs to make another bad ruling for there to be a move to have her removed. She knows what she is doing, and that's to avoid anything that can be challenged. She can't be removed for sitting on a case. And she's not tuling on motions before her so she can't be appealed. The system assumes judges will be ethical, but obviously the honor system did not foresee MAGA judges.
My question is if Trump loses there won't be any way for her to sit on the case forever. She will have to do something eventually. The dilamma is that is she isn't removed, and a jury is selected, at any point she can dismiss the case, and won't need any reason. Then double jeoardy protects Trump.
Is your legal experience in federal court?Florida state law and my long and successful experience as a litigator.
That is an interesting aspect.Don’t you think it’s telling that the prosecution didn’t move to disqualify the judge?
I have heard analysts say that he is waiting for something concrete and this may be it. She has been getting very close, but had not crossed the line yet.Florida state law and my long and successful experience as a litigator. Don’t you think it’s telling that the prosecution didn’t move to disqualify the judge?
Who is "he"?I have heard analysts say that he is waiting for something concrete and this may be it. She has been getting very close, but had not crossed the line yet.
Prosecution appealed her earlier activities in this trial. She was rebuked twice by the 11t Circuit. Since then she has been issuing paperless orders that can not be appealed because they relate to her scheduling of court actions.Florida state law and my long and successful experience as a litigator. Don’t you think it’s telling that the prosecution didn’t move to disqualify the judge?
Not going to happen.For no good reason. She is the one that kept delaying events until it had to be postponed. This will probably cause an appeal now and hopefully cause a new judge to be found, but it is now very unlikely to have a trial before the election. She is corrupt and needs to be removed. This is not the first time that she has shown unreasonable favoritism for Trump.
What I read is was the DA misrepresented the classified evidence to the judge.Trump appoints judge.
Trump criminally tried in court by judge.
Judge doesn't recuse herself.
Judge rules no trial before Trump's election.
Is anyone else a wee bit suspicious of monkey business?
In recent filings, Smith acknowledged there are some boxes where the order of items is "not the same" as in the digital scans of the materials. Smith's team added that the evidence may be in a different order as things shift easily when the boxes are carried.
I mistakenly referenced state law. For federal judges, the standard for recusal is set forth in 28 USC 455 and 29 CFR 2200.68. Yes, I practice in federal court but most of my cases are in state court (not Florida).Is your legal experience in federal court?
I'd expect you to be able to cite a particular
law or court rule supporting the claim that
this situation doesn't rise to the level of
requiring recusal.
That is an interesting aspect.
And???Prosecution appealed her earlier activities in this trial. She was rebuked twice by the 11t Circuit. Since then she has been issuing paperless orders that can not be appealed because they relate to her scheduling of court actions.
Why not?Not going to happen.
Paperless orders regarding court schedule is not appealable.And???
Did the prosecution move to disqualify her?
Just my prediction the Judge is going nowhere.Why not?