• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trump's Judge Indefinitely Postpones Trump's Trial In FL

Revoltingest

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Shadow Wolf said:
(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

Yeah, the judge definitely needs to recuse herself.
Click to expand...
But that doesn't specifically state recusal is required when
the judge got her job from the defendant, who might also
elevate the judge to SCOTUS as a reward for loyalty.
Where's the possible conflict there, eh.
 
Shadow Wolf

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Revoltingest said:
But that doesn't specifically state recusal is required when
the judge got her job from the defendant, who might also
elevate the judge to SCOTUS as a reward for loyalty.
Where's the possible conflict there, eh.
Click to expand...
Maybe to the apex MAGA who's the seventh inbred son of a seventh inbred son it seems impossible for the impartiality of the judge to be questioned because the wording of that law is far above a Dr. Suess book amd they think impartiality is some Jeff Foxworthy redneck word.
 
Pogo

Pogo

Well-Known Member
Shadow Wolf said:
(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

Yeah, the judge definitely needs to recuse herself.
Click to expand...
And the circuit needs to remove her for general malfeasance as she has already created an unfair environment by denying the people a speedy trial. The people have rights too.
 
Laniakea

Laniakea

Not of this world
Shadow Wolf said:
(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

Yeah, the judge definitely needs to recuse herself.
Click to expand...
The judges Trump has had to deal with who have shown their leftist political leanings haven't recused themselves, so this judge shouldn't have to either--unless you want to see a double-standard employed in the justice system.
 
Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Laniakea said:
The judges Trump has had to deal with who have shown their leftist political leanings haven't recused themselves, so this judge shouldn't have to either--unless you want to see a double-standard employed in the justice system.
Click to expand...
Wanting to prosecute Trump for crimes that he apparently committed is not "leftist". It would be seeking justice. Do you have any evidence of leftist behavior?
 
Laniakea

Laniakea

Not of this world
Subduction Zone said:
Wanting to prosecute Trump for crimes that he apparently committed is not "leftist". It would be seeking justice. Do you have any evidence of leftist behavior?
Click to expand...
If the judge is "wanting to prosecute Trump", that shows a bias. A judge is there to hear a case and weigh the evidence presented by the prosecution and defense.
The judges in most of the cases have shown they are biased against him, and should recuse themselves, but of course they don't.
 
Wandering Monk

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
Laniakea said:
If the judge is "wanting to prosecute Trump", that shows a bias. A judge is there to hear a case and weigh the evidence presented by the prosecution and defense.
The judges in most of the cases have shown they are biased against him, and should recuse themselves, but of course they don't.
Click to expand...
Which judge has stated they want to prosecute Trump? Names please.

Specifically HOW have these judges shown their bias against Trump? Details are required.
 
Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Laniakea said:
If the judge is "wanting to prosecute Trump", that shows a bias. A judge is there to hear a case and weigh the evidence presented by the prosecution and defense.
The judges in most of the cases have shown they are biased against him, and should recuse themselves, but of course they don't.
Click to expand...
Not at all. If the evidence, which they usually see before the trial, shows that he is guilty wanting justice is not bias. If the evidence showed otherwise you would have a valid argument, but that does not appear to be the case.
 
Laniakea

Laniakea

Not of this world
Subduction Zone said:
Not at all. If the evidence, which they usually see before the trial, shows that he is guilty wanting justice is not bias. If the evidence showed otherwise you would have a valid argument, but that does not appear to be the case.
Click to expand...
Since you are not the judge or on a jury, you don't know the appearance of the case.
 
SkepticThinker

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Laniakea said:
The judges Trump has had to deal with who have shown their leftist political leanings haven't recused themselves, so this judge shouldn't have to either--unless you want to see a double-standard employed in the justice system.
Click to expand...
Why would they need to recuse themselves?
 
SkepticThinker

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Laniakea said:
If the judge is "wanting to prosecute Trump", that shows a bias. A judge is there to hear a case and weigh the evidence presented by the prosecution and defense.
The judges in most of the cases have shown they are biased against him, and should recuse themselves, but of course they don't.
Click to expand...
How have they shown they are biased against him?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top