• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Truth is not constant.

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
In what waydid you conclude that?
The only truth I seek is the spiritual truth, and that is not worthless
If anything and everyhring be be regarded as truth, then what is falsehood? Why have institutions of learning if we can simply make **** up and not be wrong?
 

QuestioningMind

Well-Known Member
Truth change according to what level of wisdom a person has achieved.
It means two people do not see the same truth, because no person hold the exact same wisdom level.
Relative truth and conditional truth are two different truths, but they are both true.

After reading through some of your responses I have to conclude that the tile you meant to give this thread is Spiritual truth is not constant. You don't seem to have a problem acknowledging that there are physical truths which are constant, like 2 + 2 = 4 or that the Earth orbits around the sun.

We have a reliable method for determining physical truths... it's called the scientific method. Is there a similar reliable method for determining spiritual truths? Personally I don't see how there could be, if as you claim the truths about spirituality aren't consistent. In fact, that suggests that there is no such thing as a spiritual truth, since that 'truth' can be completely different for two individuals and in fact can change tomorrow for any given individual.

Thus, without any reliable method for determining the truth about spiritual claims there are no genuine spiritual 'truths', only spiritual claims that can never be verified.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
After reading through some of your responses I have to conclude that the tile you meant to give this thread is Spiritual truth is not constant. You don't seem to have a problem acknowledging that there are physical truths which are constant, like 2 + 2 = 4 or that the Earth orbits around the sun.

We have a reliable method for determining physical truths... it's called the scientific method. Is there a similar reliable method for determining spiritual truths? Personally I don't see how there could be, if as you claim the truths about spirituality aren't consistent. In fact, that suggests that there is no such thing as a spiritual truth, since that 'truth' can be completely different for two individuals and in fact can change tomorrow for any given individual.

Thus, without any reliable method for determining the truth about spiritual claims there are no genuine spiritual 'truths', only spiritual claims that can never be verified.

Here is an example of relative truth, which is not spiritual, yet can't be determined by science, but you already in all likelihood believe in one of the truths.
Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development | Education, Society, & the K-12 Learner.

So which one do you believe in? Or are you amoral? That could also be the case.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
After reading through some of your responses I have to conclude that the tile you meant to give this thread is Spiritual truth is not constant. You don't seem to have a problem acknowledging that there are physical truths which are constant, like 2 + 2 = 4 or that the Earth orbits around the sun.

We have a reliable method for determining physical truths... it's called the scientific method. Is there a similar reliable method for determining spiritual truths? Personally I don't see how there could be, if as you claim the truths about spirituality aren't consistent. In fact, that suggests that there is no such thing as a spiritual truth, since that 'truth' can be completely different for two individuals and in fact can change tomorrow for any given individual.

Thus, without any reliable method for determining the truth about spiritual claims there are no genuine spiritual 'truths', only spiritual claims that can never be verified.

Take 2: The first one is not science and the second is not constant for all of the time that the universe existed. Try again.
 

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
After reading through some of your responses I have to conclude that the tile you meant to give this thread is Spiritual truth is not constant. You don't seem to have a problem acknowledging that there are physical truths which are constant, like 2 + 2 = 4 or that the Earth orbits around the sun.

We have a reliable method for determining physical truths... it's called the scientific method. Is there a similar reliable method for determining spiritual truths? Personally I don't see how there could be, if as you claim the truths about spirituality aren't consistent. In fact, that suggests that there is no such thing as a spiritual truth, since that 'truth' can be completely different for two individuals and in fact can change tomorrow for any given individual.

Thus, without any reliable method for determining the truth about spiritual claims there are no genuine spiritual 'truths', only spiritual claims that can never be verified.
Yes you have physical truth and that only is truth within the physical realm, spiritual truth also contain the none physical realms

Science work, but only in human realm
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
I take it you have not read the psychology today piece i posted.

Now I have and she is doing the usual error of taking real for real and treating existence as something. Both are philosophy and only really exists, if you believe in them.
So she is doing in effect philosophy.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Now I have and she is doing the usual error of taking real for real and treating existence as something. Both are philosophy and only really exists, if you believe in them.
So she is doing in effect philosophy.


In your opinion.
 
Top