Next time post something from you link instead of just posting the link
“Ukraine’s efforts or lack of efforts to investigate and prosecute Nazi war criminals is assessed as a total failure; they haven’t done a damn thing,” Zuroff said.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Tucker Carlson, Colonel Douglas Macgregor, The Ukraine War
- Thread starter Colt
- Start date
“Ukraine’s efforts or lack of efforts to investigate and prosecute Nazi war criminals is assessed as a total failure; they haven’t done a damn thing,” Zuroff said.
lukethethird
unknown member
from your link;I will take that as a "No" then.
Consortium News - Bias and Credibility
LEFT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They maymediabiasfactcheck.com
Bias Rating: LEFT
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL
Country: USA
It has a left bias, I'm guessing a radical left in the USA would be reporting on proposals for universal health care, rights to clean water, a move away from fossil fuels, unions, fair wages, welfare, like as in normal stuff already in place in most industrialized countries.
Last edited:
I will take that as a "No" then.
Consortium News - Bias and Credibility
LEFT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may
Do you know what we Europeans have, whenever we judge our own Brussels institutions?
Self-criticism. Lots of self-criticism towards the Troika (European Commission, ECB, IMF), towards the Trilateral, towards all these élites who are European. That's how we could get rid of certain Tax Havens lackeys and servants and elect a German politician as head of the European Commission. Through self-criticism, meaning: we judge our own.
Do Americans know this word? Self-criticism?
I mean... we need to criticize our own governors, every now and then.
Last edited:
lukethethird
unknown member
Self criticism? I think the term in the US is American exceptionalism.Do you know what we Europeans have, whenever we judge our own Brussels institutions?
Self-criticism. Lots of self-criticism towards the Troika (European Commission, ECB, IMF), towards the Trilateral, towards all these élites who are European. That's how we could get rid of certain Tax Havens lackeys and servants and elect a German politician as head of the European Commission. Through self-criticism, meaning: we judge our own.
Do Americans know this word? Self-criticism?
If they don't, it's obviously that Nuland will appear as the Holy Immaculate Virgin Mary and Soros will appear as God, to them.
There is this dogma: Americans are flawless, the others are flawed.
.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Yes, "mostly factual" along with a heavy left wing bias is not good. It is outside of the "circle of trust.":
"These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy."
It is fine to get your ideas from such sources, but you should see if it is confirmed by more reliable ones.
lukethethird
unknown member
- Overall, we rate Consortium News Left Biased based on story selection and advocacy that strongly favors the left. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting due to a lack of transparency despite a clean fact check record.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You should have read more. There was a clear exception that the article sited. Do you want to guess where they were shown to be unreliable. Let me put in a spoiler for you:
Consortium News holds strong anti-war positions, which has resulted in media credibility rater Newsguard rating them with a Red Shield, indicating they are not credible. Newsguard cites the publication of false or misleading information regarding Ukraine
lukethethird
unknown member
Of course newsguard does, no surprise there.
lukethethird
unknown member
Newsguard cites the publication of false or misleading information regarding Ukraine. However, our review indicates that most information is factual and evidence-based. They are clearly biased, but the opinions presented are anchored in fact and perhaps exaggerated.
Yes you do ... but I was talking about the Biden Blue .. and the neocon Crew. There is nothing garbled about "State Sponsored Nazi Militia" ... what was your difficulty .. which word or term did you not understand .. made you all crazy with misunderstanding .. driving you into disingenuous oblivion everything is garbled land.
Whats the trouble friend ? Do they not understand the term Azov Nazi Battalion ? in garbled propaganda land ?
Drinking deep from the fountain .. I know it is true .. but now is your chance to correct your errant ways and get rid that progressive Blue Cancel Culture Stew you got yourself into.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
One thing that you need to remember, people on the right are always complaining about how Media Bias Fact Check is supposedly "leftist". Media Bias Fact Check gives a very high rating to Newsguard:
Newsguard - Bias and Credibility
LEAST BIASED These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or
mediabiasfactcheck.com
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You keep forgetting the word "most". The one clear failure of theirs was their reporting on the Ukraine. Sorry, you need a reliable source. "Mostly factual" is rather bad in the news biz. Fox News is "mostly factual".
lukethethird
unknown member
Fox News (foxnews.com) - Bias and Credibility
Fox News is rated mixed.
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
History
Failed Fact Checks
- Says John Bolton “fundamentally was a man of the left.” – PANTS OF FIRE
- “NASA scientists fudged the numbers to make 1998 the hottest year to overstate the extent of global warming.” – PANTS ON FIRE
- Obamacare is “one big fat VA system.” – PANTS ON FIRE
- Marie Yovanovitch is “dishonest” when she claimed she never personally responded to an email from a Democratic staffer. – FALSE
- “Biden’s climate requirements” will “cut 90% of red meat from diet” to a “max 4 lbs per year” and “one burger per month.” – PANTS ON FIRE
- “Black Lives Matter says it stands with Hamas terrorists in Israeli conflict.” – FALSE
- Clinton campaign paid to ‘infiltrate’ Trump Tower, White House servers to link Trump to Russia: Durham. – FALSE
- Natural immunity protects better than vaccination; “the mortality risk of an un-boosted person under age 30 was zero”; cloth face masks, school closures had zero benefits for children and some harm – MOSTLY FALSE
Overall Bias and Credibility Rating
Overall, we rate Fox News right biased based on editorial positions that align with the right and Questionable due to the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, the use of poor sources, and numerous false claims and failed fact checks. Straight news reporting from beat reporters is generally fact-based and accurate, which earns them a Mixed factual rating. (7/19/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 04/26/2023)
Last edited:
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Okay. They lost all credibility when Trump came into power. Before then they were better. At any rate your source failed on this one topic. That is the only reason that Newsguard put them in the questionable area. Media Bias Fact Check appears to think that one error puts them in the "Most Factual" area.
lukethethird
unknown member
Newsguard cites the publication of false or misleading information regarding Ukraine. However, our review indicates that most information is factual and evidence-based.
Consortium News did not fail on the topic of Ukraine.
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
Last edited:
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You keep ignoring the term "most". They screwed up with the Ukraine. Sorry dude, try again.
lukethethird
unknown member
Most. Man, what a way to screw up.
Copernicus
Industrial Strength Linguist
I have so many documents proving it.
Imagine if these videos enter an international criminal court.
My Italian is nowhere near as good as my Russian, so I read the Russian subtitles. This speech was in Russian, not Ukrainian (which Zelensky speaks in most public venues now), and it was about people wanting to speak Russian. There was nothing in it that had any bearing on the invasion or showed that people who speak Russian were being persecuted to the extent that would justify an invasion by the Russian Federation, which had, if you will recall, guaranteed the sovereignty of Ukraine in 1994. In any case, the video ended with quotes from Russian media complaining falsely that Zelensky had no intention of complying with the Minsk agreement. The fact is that the Russian side never lifted a finger to comply with it. Although required to remove their troops from Ukraine, they never did anything of the sort. So neither side ended up complying with it. When 2022 rolled around, that was the status quo. The only thing changed was that Russia and Ukraine had used the ceasefire to prepare for the next round of hostilities, which Russia initiated.
Last edited:
Preventing the Donbas population from speaking Russian is persecution.
According to the European Court of Justice, for example.
It does justify the will to become independent. Separatism.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Yes, most, with the one noted screw up being their report on the Ukraine. I was not looking for a source that refuted your specific claim, that was just a sweet bonus.