• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

U.K. Doctors Could Soon Face Action over "Misleading" Social Media Posts

Wildswanderer

Veteran Member
You mean unregulated herbal "alternatives" that have not been demonstrated to be efficacious? Yeah, they should be weeded out. People are wasting their hard earned money on that crap that does nothing, and potentially risking their lives.
If you don't know, you don't know.
Lots of herbal remedies are far better than the crap pills we are told to buy for every tiny ailment, usually with 150 possible side effects.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
If you don't know, you don't know.
Lots of herbal remedies are far better than the crap pills we are told to buy for every tiny ailment, usually with 150 possible side effects.
Again, if you want to claim that the burden of proof is upon you. The reason why that some medicines have no side effects is because there is no medicine in them. They only make you think that you are getting better.
 

Wildswanderer

Veteran Member
Again, if you want to claim that the burden of proof is upon you. The reason why that some medicines have no side effects is because there is no medicine in them. They only make you think that you are getting better.
Ah, so if something works, it doesn't actually work unless the doctor approved it?
All the proof I need is seeing home remedies work when doctors were useless.
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
The world isn't that simple.


You seem to forget that a large number of modern medicines are derived from folk medicines and natural ingredients. two of the most commonly used are aspirin and penicillin. But the list is almost endless.
Doctors and medical scientists are searching for and testing out such natural remedies all the time. However a large proportion of their research goes into refining the active ingredient in them and removing harmful ones. Almost all natural medicines have more harmful side effects than their medicinal versions.

All medicines both natural and refined do have side effects, some effects are actually beneficial, and others are damaging in some way. every proscribed medication comes with a long list of possible side effects and their known frequency.

Untested herbal and folk remedies have just as many side effects, however they are by their nature mostly undocumented. Natural does not mean safe. Belladonna is a useful medicine but it is a deadly poison.
Digitalis (foxglove) is probably responsible for almost as many deaths as lives it has saved.
The problem is that ignorant users, by definition, have no idea what they are doing.
 

Wildswanderer

Veteran Member
You seem to forget that a large number of modern medicines are derived from folk medicines and natural ingredients. two of the most commonly used are aspirin and penicillin. But the list is almost endless.
Doctors and medical scientists are searching for and testing out such natural remedies all the time. However a large proportion of their research goes into refining the active ingredient in them and removing harmful ones. Almost all natural medicines have more harmful side effects than their medicinal versions.

All medicines both natural and refined do have side effects, some effects are actually beneficial, and others are damaging in some way. every proscribed medication comes with a long list of possible side effects and their known frequency.

Untested herbal and folk remedies have just as many side effects, however they are by their nature mostly undocumented. Natural does not mean safe. Belladonna is a useful medicine but it is a deadly poison.
Digitalis (foxglove) is probably responsible for almost as many deaths as lives it has saved.
The problem is that ignorant users, by definition, have no idea what they are doing.
Why would you assume people who use natural medicine are ignorant?
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
But isn't that tyranny to force doctors to abide by a professional standard? Shouldn't a doctor have the freedom to prescribe your child eye of newt for a serious condition?
Wouldn't be a doctor I'd go to.

But the next person? Eh.. each to their own.
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
Why would you assume people who use natural medicine are ignorant?

In matters of health probably. But some do it because they can not afford mainstream medicines. And the do not have access to a universal health service. In the UK people who use folk medicine are few and far between. And are thought pretty odd.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
So in other words let the patent roll the dice rather than hold doctors to standards and expectations? No accountability for harming or betraying the trust of those in their care?
Well I'm sure people won't go back to that doctor anymore. Reputation is far more effective than declaration.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Well I'm sure people won't go back to that doctor anymore. Reputation is far more effective than declaration.
Physicians tend to not get bad reputations until
long after much damage has been done. In MI,
we've had a couple docs who molested many
hundreds of patients over decades before their
crimes were discovered.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Physicians tend to not get bad reputations until
long after much damage has been done. In MI,
we've had a couple docs who molested many
hundreds of patients over decades before their
crimes were discovered.
Well there goes their reputation. Salted.
 
Top