Uganda to pass kill the gays bill

[LuisDantas]

Even assuming that to be a fact, it still falls way, way short from excusing such a monstrous decision.

 

[Flankerl]

Uganda has come a long way. Idi Amin would have just eaten a couple of suspected gays to scare the others. This, of course, is outrageous. Maybe we can use this for an excuse to finally invade Uganda.

Lead the way.

 

[Kerr]

Three Cheers for Uganda.

At least they are not caving to international pressure and letting other people tell them what laws they can and can't pass. The fact that they are standing up to the fake "humanitarianism" and cultural Marxism of liberal Western countries is something they deserve credit for.

You actually approve of making homosexuality a capital offense?

 

[Kerr]

Cultural Marxism is different from "Economic" Marxism. One is the application of dialectical materialism to economic superstructure, while Cultural Marxism is applying Marxist thought to undermine social and cultural substructure. Look it up.

And the bill, despite what the controlled media is saying, is not a "Kill the Gays" bill. Only under very few instances will they be killed, for instance, forcing sexual intercourse on young children.



No, I support the right of nations to determine their own fate, write and approve their own laws, and preserve their identity without the interference of imperialist powers like the US or the UK, or supranational entities like the UN. In theory, I would equally approve of the Netherlands recognizing same-sex unions even if some other country opposed it.

So basically you cheer for any nation that does something different, no matter what it is? You have no opinion of your own about other nations?

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Three Cheers for Uganda.

At least they are not caving to international pressure and letting other people tell them what laws they can and can't pass. The fact that they are standing up to the fake "humanitarianism" and cultural Marxism of liberal Western countries is something they deserve credit for.

So they deserve credit for doing something that seeks to kill an innocent person, just because they did it? By this logical one could assume you also support Ted Bundy, Charles Manson, Edward Gein, Stalin, and Hitler. They too done things just because they could, despite the "cultural Marxism of liber Western countries" was telling them not too and they stood up to it.

 

[dgirl1986]

There's always one who has to pipe up...

 

[dgirl1986]

And the bill, despite what the controlled media is saying, is not a "Kill the Gays" bill. Only under very few instances will they be killed, for instance, forcing sexual intercourse on young children.

Criminalizing the act will open up all sorts of issues. I am sure there will be more of this (see below) which was taken from the article I posted a link to.

Gay rights activist David Kato was murdered in Uganda in January 2011 shortly after a local newspaper published images of him and other gay people under a headline urging readers to ‘hang them.’

 

[tumbleweed41]

If anyone wants a preview of what Theocracy would look like, all one needs to do is look at Uganda.
And yes, this movement was inspired by three American Evangelical Christians who visited Uganda in March of 2009 who gave their "expert" advice on homosexuality and the "homosexual agenda".
According to Stephen Langa, the Ugandan organizer of the three day event of talks, the theme was “the gay agenda — that whole hidden and dark agenda” — and the threat homosexuals posed to Bible-based values and the traditional African family."
The American Evangilists discussed how to make gay people straight, how gay men sodomize teenage boys and how “the gay movement is an evil institution” whose goal is “to defeat the marriage-based society and replace it with a culture of sexual promiscuity.”

The legislation to criminalize homosexuality as a capital offense was introduced by a previously unknown Ugandan legislator, with self described associations to many "American Evangelicals", one month after the speaking event.

This is Religious Fundamentalism at its worst.

 

[tumbleweed41]

Three Cheers for Uganda.

At least they are not caving to international pressure and letting other people tell them what laws they can and can't pass. The fact that they are standing up to the fake "humanitarianism" and cultural Marxism of liberal Western countries is something they deserve credit for.

Your statement disgusts me.

 

[Father Heathen]

Should that honestly supersede the rights and liberty of their citizens? Should injustice and atrocities against the innocent be a nation's right?

Well?

 

[Î Î¿Î»Ï Ï€Î­ÏÏ‡Ï‰Î½ Γʹ]

So basically you cheer for any nation that does something different, no matter what it is? You have no opinion of your own about other nations?

I could frankly care less what happens in another country.

This is Religious Fundamentalism at its worst.

The endless wars conducted under the leadership of secularist mafiosi like Obama is far worse in terms of its destructiveness and savagery.

 

[dgirl1986]

I could frankly care less what happens in another country.

Charming. Why bother getting involved in this thread then?

 

[tumbleweed41]

"secularist mafiosi"

Ah yes, the organized ring of religious-neutral crime bosses.

Rather than deflecting, why not address your implicit endorsement of the murder of humans based on sexual orientation?

 

[tumbleweed41]

I could frankly care less what happens in another country.

A common failing of the self-righteous.

'I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.'

 

[Kerr]

I could frankly care less what happens in another country.

Then why cheer for Uganda when they passes this bill?

 

[oldbadger]

Asylum! It is often very difficult for immigrants to prove that they risk injustice, torture, or death in their own lands. Not so for those that will need to flee from Uganda.

When, in the 21st century, there are countries that want to return to the dark ages, to Nazi type policies, the only thing of value that I can drag out of it is that no humanitarian country in the World could remain indifferent to homosexual asylum-seekers from this place.

If this was aided or initiated by religious zealots, then maybe they should be discoered and exposed?

 

[dgirl1986]

Asylum! It is often very difficult for immigrants to prove that they risk injustice, torture, or death in their own lands. Not so for those that will need to flee from Uganda.

When, in the 21st century, there are countries that want to return to the dark ages, to Nazi type policies, the only thing of value that I can drag out of it is that no humanitarian country in the World could remain indifferent to homosexual asylum-seekers from this place.

If this was aided or initiated by religious zealots, then maybe they should be discoered and exposed?

I remember a man fleeing to the UK on grounds similar to this...but they forced him to go back to his country.

 

[Kerr]

Asylum! It is often very difficult for immigrants to prove that they risk injustice, torture, or death in their own lands. Not so for those that will need to flee from Uganda.

When, in the 21st century, there are countries that want to return to the dark ages, to Nazi type policies, the only thing of value that I can drag out of it is that no humanitarian country in the World could remain indifferent to homosexual asylum-seekers from this place.

If this was aided or initiated by religious zealots, then maybe they should be discoered and exposed?

Never underestimate how willing the immigration office can be to believe that immigrants can return safely, even in the case of obvious prosecution.

I agree with you, though, that they should not send away people who runs from things like this.

 

[oldbadger]

I remember a man fleeing to the UK on grounds similar to this...but they forced him to go back to his country.

Yes! I think that most countries are or have been skeptical about so many appeals for asylum.

But my point is, that in this case, from this country, that appeal would be hard to dismiss? At least, let's hope so?

 

[oldbadger]

Never underestimate how willing the immigration office can be to believe that immigrants can return safely, even in the case of obvious prosecution.

I agree with you, though, that they should not send away people who runs from things like this.

Let's hope that any homosexual asylum seeker from Uganda is protected.