• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Unbridled Capitalism is self-destructive

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Our " socialist" friends should have had the
chance to experience Mao's time in China.
Stories from family from there were horrifying.
They complain about high prices & low wages
under capitalism. Beats eating bugs & mice
in a re-education camp, even if they're free.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
If you don't understand the subject you're discussing...
OGC.d3b3e69c9c85c6560993517c107e3c06
 

We Never Know

No Slack
"Only when the last tree has died, the last river been poisoned and the last fish been caught will we realize we cannot eat money" -the internet

Now since there seems to be some disagreements where that quote came from, I will simply attribute it to the internet.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
And then there's motivation.
Whatever one does, it's shared.
One's work makes an insignificant difference.
Let someone else do it.

How do they get rid of mice in the Kremlin?
Post a sign saying WORKERS COLLECTIVE.
Half will starve.
The other half will flee.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Why do you ask?
To dodge what I said ?

I'm not dodging anything. You're the one who suggested that socialists should have had the chance to experience Mao's time in China. I'm not acceding to your irrational and illogical attempt at guilt by association, so there's nothing for me to "dodge."

Here's socialist " out with the old,
in with the new" Complete with heroic realism.

I realize that China has gone through some horrific times. Even if I wasn't there to experience it, I've read plenty of horror stories - not just about Mao, though. The Japanese occupiers were pretty nasty, too, and Chiang Kai-Shek's Kuomintang were also quite a piece of work.

In fact, this site has some interesting facts: Twentieth Century Atlas - Historical Body Count

I posted about this nearly five years ago in a thread where @Revoltingest and I had the same discussion we're having now: The answer is a communist party



Rank
Death Toll
Cause
Centuries
166 millionSecond World War20C
240 millionMao Zedong (mostly famine)20C
40 millionGenghis Khan13C
427 millionBritish India (mostly famine)19C
525 millionFall of the Ming Dynasty17C
620 millionTaiping Rebellion19C
20 millionJoseph Stalin20C
818½ millionMideast Slave Trade7C-19C
917 millionTimur Lenk14C-15C
1016 millionAtlantic Slave Trade15C-19C
1115 millionFirst World War20C
15 millionConquest of the Americas15C-19C
1313 millionAn Lushan Revolt8C
1410 millionXin Dynasty1C
10 millionCongo Free State19C-20C
169 millionRussian Civil War20C
177½ millionThirty Years War17C
7½ millionFall of the Yuan Dynasty14C
197 millionFall of Rome5C
7 millionChinese Civil Wars20C

Look at how many of these events involve China. Not just Mao, but also Genghis Khan, Fall of the Ming Dynasty, the Taiping Rebellion, An Lushan Revolt, Xin Dynasty, Fall of the Yuan Dynasty, Chinese Civil Wars. 8 out of the 20 events listed here of the worst things humans have done in recorded history.

So, if your only purpose in this discussion is to talk about who the worst people in history were, then we can have that discussion. But as I pointed out in the earlier thread, political systems don't kill people. People kill people.
 
Last edited:

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Criticism should be tempered with mirth.

Yeah, but then we could keep posting that "Irony" gif back and forth, since you've made many similarly ironic comments. It's just part of your style. It's irritating but it kind of grows on one after a while.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Since the panic of covid has gone away, anytime I go to the store they have everything I need.

I've noticed it depends on the product. It's not that bad, nor was it ever really that bad in socialist countries, despite certain people's exaggerations about things they can't possibly know about. There were occasional shortages in the USSR, just like we've had here. It happens.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
That's your opinion.



If you don't understand the subject you're discussing, then your best bet is to bow out and not make bizarre, nonsensical statements. I find most of your posts to be incoherent.

It has nothing to do with envy at all. It has to do with people on the streets without homes, and people without enough money for food. The reason they don't have enough money is not because of envy or being a non-achiever or any other social Darwinist BS you can come up with. That's a load of crap, and you know it.

Every business is in business to make oney. Do you deny this? If so, then prove to me that businesses are in business for strictly charitable purposes. If not, then my point is proven and my argument is valid.

And that's it.
You actually think your envy
has nothing to with being greedy?
Droll.

It's your envy that drives your cant n rant.
It's you I'm addressing not yonder peasants.

That you've no success in business is evident.
I could buy everything you own and give it to charity.
No envy? Your posts drip with it.

And, "social darwinism"? That is bs for sure. So is
pretending it's me came up with it!

Run business for charity? Droll as droll can be.
You surely do prove your point with such drivel.
Not the point you think, tho.

You think you know how things work? Ever sit on
a corporate board? Invest in anythjng bigger tha a car ?
Start an enterprise, provide jobs?

Ha. As if.

I'll admit I didn't get a flat in Repulse Bay,
another here in S'pore, and the money I play with by working in a noodle factory. It's nice to get a head start.

But hey. You know so much?You come to Hong Kong, try your hand.
In business. Find out which of us knows what
they're talking about. I do it for fun. I've a feeling
you would not have fun.
 
Last edited:

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I'm not dodging anything. You're the one who suggested that socialists should have had the chance to experience Mao's time in China. I'm not acceding to your irrational and illogical attempt at guilt by association, so there's nothing for me to "dodge."



I realize that China has gone through some horrific times. Even if I wasn't there to experience it, I've read plenty of horror stories - not just about Mao, though. The Japanese occupiers were pretty nasty, too, and Chiang Kai-Shek's Kuomintang were also quite a piece of work.

In fact, this site has some interesting facts: Twentieth Century Atlas - Historical Body Count

I posted about this nearly five years ago in a thread where @Revoltingest and I had the same discussion we're having now: The answer is a communist party

He tried to do the duck and dodge back then, too, but the facts speak for themselves.

Rank
Death Toll
Cause
Centuries
166 millionSecond World War20C
240 millionMao Zedong (mostly famine)20C
40 millionGenghis Khan13C
427 millionBritish India (mostly famine)19C
525 millionFall of the Ming Dynasty17C
620 millionTaiping Rebellion19C
20 millionJoseph Stalin20C
818½ millionMideast Slave Trade7C-19C
917 millionTimur Lenk14C-15C
1016 millionAtlantic Slave Trade15C-19C
1115 millionFirst World War20C
15 millionConquest of the Americas15C-19C
1313 millionAn Lushan Revolt8C
1410 millionXin Dynasty1C
10 millionCongo Free State19C-20C
169 millionRussian Civil War20C
177½ millionThirty Years War17C
7½ millionFall of the Yuan Dynasty14C
197 millionFall of Rome5C
7 millionChinese Civil Wars20C

Look at how many of these events involve China. Not just Mao, but also Genghis Khan, Fall of the Ming Dynasty, the Taiping Rebellion, An Lushan Revolt, Xin Dynasty, Fall of the Yuan Dynasty, Chinese Civil Wars. 8 out of the 20 events listed here of the worst things humans have done in recorded history.

So, if your only purpose in this discussion is to talk about who the worst people in history were, then we can have that discussion. But as I pointed out in the earlier thread, political systems don't kill people. People kill people.
You mistakenly attribute things to capitalism.
You think that because I find your arguments
vapid & irrelevant that this is to duck & dodge
them. Just a misunderstanding.
 
Top