JMiller
Member
Would you rephrase that please?I would like to see research articles on this because most certainly answers point the other way
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Would you rephrase that please?I would like to see research articles on this because most certainly answers point the other way
Would you rephrase that please?
Let me see if I understand your objection. I'll start with explaining my statement.Actually, watching porn does make certain individuals more apt to rape.
Though we can quickly conclude it is not the porn per se, but the porn is a powerful trigger to which underlining problems exist.I would like to see research articles on this because most certainly answers point the other way
back your statement is what it means
I find it to be false as well
I pledge allegiance,
To the flag,
Of the United States of Pornography.
And to the repression,
From which it stems,
One nation,
Underwhelmed,
Obsessional,
With internet,
And hangups,
For all.
First, my comment was only interested in whether or not a person who is already a rapist is more apt to rape if he just watched porn.
do you enjoy beautiful naked women?? I do
Absolutely.
As always, you completely misinterpreted the intent of what I posted.
Wait if the person is already a rapist, they would rape whether or not they watched porn, football, or Survivor. That's why they are labeled a rapist.Let me see if I understand your objection. I'll start with explaining my statement.
First, my comment was only interested in whether or not a person who is already a rapist is more apt to rape if he just watched porn. (I will grant you this explanation is more finely tuned than my previous statement, so let me know if your objections still apply).
I will give you a chance to respond, by chance there was some confusion about my initial statement.
This would be correct.Wait if the person is already a rapist, they would rape whether or not they watched porn, football, or Survivor. That's why they are labeled a rapist.
Careful, the anti-porn mind is just tilted enough to take such stuff seriously and come out against toothpaste.I think it's fun to substite the word "pornography" in the OP with the word "kittens". The OP makes just as much sense either way. It works with other words too. Like "toothpaste". We brush our teeth in the USA, women are raped in the USA, toothpaste causes women to be raped. It's like a really sad game.
According to the APA, no.This would be correct.
So then, the next question is, can someone who has urges to rape someone, be pushed over the edge to do it, if watching a bunch of porn, especially porn that makes light of raping?
Just a question...
Okay, then perhaps you could present some scientific data linking pornography with rape?
OMG people enjoying themselves!!!! oh heaven stop them !! OH oH OH Oh oH oH oH
For some of us, there is no such thing as "sinful" & there is nothing wrong with "lustful".....watching pornography leads to the corruption of mind, forcing one to think lustful and sinful thoughts...
I do not have any data on that and I am not making that claim. However,
watching pornography leads to the corruption of mind, forcing one to think lustful and sinful thoughts.
If you witness a murder, are you likely to be traumatised by it?
If you are constantly bombarded by images of food, are you likely to become hungry?
As the visuals become embedded deeper within the mind they spread to the heart and begin creating emotions, cravings toward that activity. Activities which are not permitted.
Make up your mind.I do not have any data on that and I am not making that claim. However, watching pornography leads to the corruption of mind, forcing one to think lustful and sinful thoughts.
This is like saying playing violent video games will cause people to be more violent.watching pornography leads to the corruption of mind, forcing one to think lustful and sinful thoughts.
If you witness a murder, are you likely to be traumatised by it?
If you are constantly bombarded by images of food, are you likely to become hungry?
As the visuals become embedded deeper within the mind they spread to the heart and begin creating emotions, cravings toward that activity. Activities which are not permitted.
For some of us, there is no such thing as "sinful" & there is nothing wrong with "lustful".
If you could show a strong causative relationship between watching porn & committing assaults, then you might have an argument.
Otherwise, it all seems to be about prudery. That's fine for you, but not something to impose upon us reprobates.
You do realize that your opinions regarding "sin" are irrelevant to those who don't share your religious beliefs, right? Lust and sexuality are healthy, natural and beautiful.
This is like saying playing violent video games will cause people to be more violent.
Fundies hate when people who are labeled "sinful" and "lustful" don't actually end up performing those acts they speak of.