Pogo
Well-Known Member
they effectively already are, we are a Republican form of government, not a straight democracy.Term limits on them and all voted offices.
Maybe the justices should be voted in too instead of hand picked.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
they effectively already are, we are a Republican form of government, not a straight democracy.Term limits on them and all voted offices.
Maybe the justices should be voted in too instead of hand picked.
one wonders why you are avoiding answering the question.Wikipedia. Excellent!
My problem with this set up is that the people are given a magicians choice to begin with...they effectively already are, we are a Republican form of government, not a straight democracy.
Then why did you bother asking me a loaded question?
We have a bunch of wankers who can kiss the People's ***.We do now...
A well respected source to refer people to that are unfamiliar with even the basics, was it inappropriate? Why?Wikipedia. Excellent!
But we are ultimately responsible.My problem with this set up is that the people are given a magicians choice to begin with...
I think they prefer to be the Kissee.We have a bunch of wankers who can kiss the People's ***.
Amd I prefer to address them as "your royal ****erds."I think they prefer to be the Kissee.
Yes, their job is to interpret, not just function as a robot, that is why we have this structure, the law is not an air hockey table.So they’re corrupt because, in your words, “They behaved within the letter of the law.” Got it.
I see. So Trump didn't stack SCOTUS, voters did.they effectively already are, we are a Republican form of government, not a straight democracy.
I had no part in this. I was telling people Hilary must win to avoid this disastrous Supreme Court.But we are ultimately responsible.
Hmm are you confused?
No. It's something for pseudo-intellectuals to snub because they are stuck on years ago when everyone was warning about it ans not today where it's been rated as accurate as Britannica.A well respected source to refer people to that are unfamiliar with even the basics, was it inappropriate? Why?
What else other than the ruling itself?
You believe that Trump is a puppet?Biden should pardon him, right now, and announce that the US has better things to do, like going after the real architects of the attempted coup, the people who give Trump his marching orders, and then bury all the schmucks who stood on stage with him.
It is so obvious you are completely unable to explain it?
So what was followed in SCOTUS this time.start here;
The letter of the law and the spirit of the law are two possible ways to regard rules, or laws. To obey the letter of the law is to follow the literal reading of the words of the law, whereas following the spirit of the law is to follow the intention of why the law was enforced. Wikipedia
Are you new to this concept?