Green Gaia
Veteran Member
I've found that most who use the rhetoric of damnation/salvation do take it as literal. But you're right, not everyone does.Victor said:That is of course if you take the fire as literal.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I've found that most who use the rhetoric of damnation/salvation do take it as literal. But you're right, not everyone does.Victor said:That is of course if you take the fire as literal.
Maize said:I've found that most who use the rhetoric of damnation/salvation do take it as literal. But you're right, not everyone does.
End of story? Sure, because you're one of the lucky ones. I'm curious as to why you think it worked out this way for you. Why do you believe God loves you more than he does the person who never had the opportunity to "follow His commands" because they never knew about His commands?Christiangirl0909 said:God says in the Bible that only those who follow his commands will be saved. There's no way to get around it. To be in Heaven, we must follow God. Period. End of story.
And just because some people interpret a 2000 year old book a certain way, a book that has been translated over and over again doesn't make it true either.Christiangirl0909 said:May I point out that just because it doesn't click with the way you see things doesn't make it untrue.
Victor said:
The hell with hell! says the modern mind.
some flawed logic here. "If there is a heaven, there can be a not-heaven." sure. but then he goes on "Those who deny hell must also deny either heaven..."Victor said:Hell follows from two other doctrines: heaven and free will. If there is a heaven, there can be a not-heaven. And if there is free will, we can act on it and abuse it. Those who deny hell must also deny either heaven (as does Western secularism) or free will (as does Eastern pantheism).
If someone isn't brought up to believe that interpretation of the Bible, or even Christianity, then a Christian Hell is hard to grasp and accept.Christiangirl0909 said:Honestly, I don't see why this concept is so hard to grasp. God loves us, which is why He gave us the Bible. But if we don't follow it, that's us throwing away happiness with both hands. We have to follow him if we wish to be rewarded some day.
Christiangirl0909 said:Ok, ok, maybe the analogy was bad, but God says in the Bible that only those who follow his commands will be saved. There's no way to get around it. To be in Heaven, we must follow God. Period. End of story.
Well, let me see if I can explain it then, Christiangirl... Not everyone who has ever lived has even heard of Jesus Christ or knew what the Bible was. Billions of good people were not as fortunate as you are. They could hardly have thrown something away which they never had.
So it's all about reward?
The "american" gave it away for me...divine said:according to [SIZE=-1][FONT=Arial,Helvetica]these statistics,[/FONT][/SIZE] a big chunk ( 54%, 73%, 85%) of the american population believe that hell is very real. (interestingly, considerably less believe they have a chance of ending up there.)
Oh this get's into a whole other can of worms that is even more troublesame then there is a hell.divine said:some flawed logic here. "If there is a heaven, there can be a not-heaven." sure. but then he goes on "Those who deny hell must also deny either heaven..."
Beats me, why you ask?divine said:exactly what eastern pantheism denies free will, btw?
sparc872 said:When I was a Christian, one of the biggest things that always disturbed me was the thought of an all-loving God sending most of his beloved children to an eternal lake of fire; punishing finite sins for infinite duration. I could never wrap my head around that. It just didn't make sense to me.
For those out there who believe in Universal Salvation, I am asking you what scriptural evidence you have to back it up.
Maize said:
Besides, I don't go for scare tactics.
I'm guessing this comes, albeit mistakenly, from things like Buddhism's concept of 'no-independent-arising'. It might be a response to Tao-Chia type thinking as expressed by Wei Wu Wei (he didn't believe in free will or determinism as having any validity, no object-subject distinction in the non-dual mind).divine said:exactly what eastern pantheism denies free will, btw?
I didn't take my interpretaion of Hell as a metaphor. I think it is very real.Scarlett Wampus said:Victor if I take Hell to be a metaphor for separation from the spiritual heart then that article you posted by Paul Kreeft has a message that makes sense to me: there is a real danger, and its a danger I can recognise. Hell as an actual place however, a place in some afterlife; well it comes across as too strange for someone like me to take seriously.
Why do you believe God loves you more than he does the person who never had the opportunity to "follow His commands" because they never knew about His commands?
If someone isn't brought up to believe that interpretation of the Bible, or even Christianity, then a Christian Hell is hard to grasp and accept.
Christiangirl0909 said:Which makes our job all the more important. We must teach others. If someone never knew, well, I'm really sorry. But the Bible says you must believe. It makes no exceptions, and I don't think we can just assume that God will make one.
Don't you hope to be rewarded by going to Heaven? I know that it's much preferable to Hell. If you were asking "am I Christian just to get to Heaven" then the answer is no. I am a Christians because I want to serve God. He loves me.
Maize said:
So it's all about reward?
Something I try to teach my kids is that they should do the right thing, i.e. telling the truth, not because if they don't they will get into trouble or that if they do they will be rewarded, but they should do it simply because it is the right thing to do.
Maize said:Besides, I don't go for scare tactics.
I think I already stated that I do not believe in places of damnation or salvation. So I can't answer that. I do know that what is important is this life. Our incentive should be, not some possible reward after we die, but ro live a good and productive life that will result in a more sane, peaceful, and just world than the one we have at present, and to pass on a better world to succeeding generations.Christiangirl0909 said:Don't you hope to be rewarded by going to Heaven?
I know that it's much preferable to Hell.
So, too bad for the little kid that grew up in the middle of the Amazon Rain Forest 150 years ago, huh. If that's the case, God's a jerk. Good thing I don't believe that about Him.
Scarlett Wampus said:if I take Hell to be a metaphor for separation from the spiritual heart