Aye, Putin is the real victim here."Now look at what you made me do."
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Aye, Putin is the real victim here."Now look at what you made me do."
I have never said Putin is a victim.Aye, Putin is the real victim here.
Because it's Fox News. They are the unofficial voice of the GOP, they have to create a narrative to accuse Biden. If there was evidence that some pubs conspired with the military to have done it, Tucker would praise it as a heroic and necessary act - and then accuse Biden for not having control over the troops.Why suspect Biden as the saboteur?
You won't win over many to your side byI have never said Putin is a victim.
But neither are the godless financial elites overseas.
Who constantly victimize Americans, their own people.
I have so many atheist friends who are wonderful people much more than self-proclaimed Catholics.You won't win over many to your side by
making godlessness part of the problem.
Not huge environmentally. Methane does't pollute the sea much and although it is a strong greenhouse gas, the pipe is not supplying any gas, being shut down at both ends, so all that is coming out is what was in it at the time - and then it will stop. One estimate I have seen is that its climate change potential is similar to the annual CO2 emission of a medium sized city. That's not great, but it's not a catastrophe.I'm not saying we did, but do you agree that what biden and nuland said was actually very sloppy? They seemed to say, with great ambiguity, that they wanted to stop the pipeline, if an invasion occurred. I don't think those were the right things to really say. And you also say this is not a big deal in some way, but from what I can tell at the moment, this might be pretty significant environmentally?
Have you not noticed that Putin uses his religionI have so many atheist friends who are wonderful people much more than self-proclaimed Catholics.
These elites overseas are godless because if they believed in a God, they would have a minimum of fear of God (and his judgment), and would never do what they do.
Yep.Speculation is fun, but ultimately we are just creating narratives out of thin air that are potentially plausible.
We can make cases for numerous actors, as to the truth we don't know.
Not huge environmentally. Methane does't pollute the sea much and although it is a strong greenhouse gas, the pipe is not supplying any gas, being shut down at both ends, so all that is coming out is what was in it at the time - and then it will stop. One estimate I have seen is that its climate change potential is similar to the annual CO2 emission of a medium sized city. That's not great, but it's not a catastrophe.
As far as the effect on gas for the winter, the EU had already banked on it not operating, and is ahead of plan filling storage from other sources. A new LNG gasification unit is already up and running in the Netherlands and 2 more are due to be running in Germany within a month or two, so the import capacity has been ramped up a lot.
It could undoubtedly be tough if there is a hard winter, but as nobody was expecting Nordstream to supply any gas for the foreseeable future in any case, blowing up the line does nothing to change that - except to reconfirm that the EU won't ever rely on Russian gas again. And with every year that passes from here on, the reliance on gas as a whole will be reducing, as renewables and nuclear are ramped up. So Putin's threat is pretty empty. But it's all he's got, so he's making the most of it.
The pipeline is owned by Russia by the way, so he's destroyed his own property, not the EU's.
As for what Biden said, I have yet to see an actual quote from him in context. US presidents are often remarkably inarticulate when speaking off the cuff, but then again the media - especially those with a political slant - have a habit of quote-mining people out of context. So I can't usefully comment on that.
Have you not noticed that Putin uses his religion
to justify the invasion...with the church's approval?
I say that your God is more at fault than we heathens.
Not huge environmentally. Methane does't pollute the sea much and although it is a strong greenhouse gas, the pipe is not supplying any gas, being shut down at both ends, so all that is coming out is what was in it at the time - and then it will stop. One estimate I have seen is that its climate change potential is similar to the annual CO2 emission of a medium sized city. That's not great, but it's not a catastrophe.
As far as the effect on gas for the winter, the EU had already banked on it not operating, and is ahead of plan filling storage from other sources. A new LNG gasification unit is already up and running in the Netherlands and 2 more are due to be running in Germany within a month or two, so the import capacity has been ramped up a lot.
It could undoubtedly be tough if there is a hard winter, but as nobody was expecting Nordstream to supply any gas for the foreseeable future in any case, blowing up the line does nothing to change that - except to reconfirm that the EU won't ever rely on Russian gas again. And with every year that passes from here on, the reliance on gas as a whole will be reducing, as renewables and nuclear are ramped up. So Putin's threat is pretty empty. But it's all he's got, so he's making the most of it.
The pipeline is owned by Russia by the way, so he's destroyed his own property, not the EU's.
As for what Biden said, I have yet to see an actual quote from him in context. US presidents are often remarkably inarticulate when speaking off the cuff, but then again the media - especially those with a political slant - have a habit of quote-mining people out of context. So I can't usefully comment on that.
I need to remind you that most German media have a clear stance on the event.Yep.
But I've never lost a bet when it came to accusing the US of an international, nefarious act. It's what they do.
Normalized double standards: we are saints, they are bad?
All energy generation has its risks. The track record of nuclear is fairly good and it's certainly something we cannot do without if we want to control climate change.I've read articles on nuclear that do make it sound good, but for example, the situation in ukraine where fighting can happen around nuclear power plants does not sound very good at all. And there's also fukushima, which was affected by a natural disaster
I need to remind you that the "Atlantik Brücke" is a thing and many influential journalists are members.I need to remind you that most German media have a clear stance on the event.
I don't think that many humans are 'saints,' nor are that many truly 'bad,' but I do think that people get influenced by people who are more influential. As well, different people can be both good and bad, and change from one to the other, over the course of a lifetime. Motivations can conflict. Last night for example, I watched a 3 hour movie on the life of julius caesar. I was trying to figure out what the power interplay was between sulla, pompey, and caesar - sometimes to make a gain, do they not have to falsely ingratiate themselves to others?
In this case, religion inspires death &Kissinger is a theist too, I guess he believes he will go to Heaven.
Each of us has a personal interpretation of religion.
In this case, religion inspires death &
destruction in conquest of another country.
It's how Putin & the Russian Orthodox ChurchIt depends on how one interprets them.
It's how Putin & the Russian Orthodox Church
interpret Christianity, ie, they must save their
empire (current & former) from decadent
heathen western corruption....& Nazis.