outhouse
Atheistically
What evidence is there for the creator?
factually none.
What evidence is there that I was designed?
factually none.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What evidence is there for the creator?
What evidence is there that I was designed?
There are such brilliant designs everywhere. Here are just a few:
- Air conditioning in termite mounds
- The anchoring skill of the razor clam
- The navigation skill of the dung beetle
- The storage ability of DNA
so you.....and the other 7billion people ....We know paintings have a creator because they are inorganic creations. We know and have evidence of the process. I am asking evidence for organic life necessarily having a creator. Man made creations are not in question. There is no evidence that complex organic life forms have a creator. You keep on dodging the question by pointing to irrelevant man made creations.
The issue of creationism is a matter of removing evolution from the picture. It's the basis of creationism that's a matter of faith.This issue of Creationism seems to be another matter of faith.
See HERE for your answer.The accepted theory is that humans evolved from the great apes.
If so why are there still great apes.
Why aren't there the odd human with noticeable ape characteristics?
And so on.
nay....The issue of creationism is a matter of removing evolution from the picture. The basis of creationism is a matter of faith.
See HERE for your answer.
I repeat that no information based entity, living or non-living, has been demonstrated to exist apart from an intelligent creator. The fact that evolutionists cannot accept this evidence does not mean the evidence does not exist. It means they refuse to admit the obvious fact that design requires a designer, and that information based entities display evidence of design. Claiming only man made designs prove a designer is simply nonsense, IMO.
Nope, as it being an accident is not the only other option. There are a plethora of reasons why life has evolved in specific ways.so you.....and the other 7billion people ....
and ALL of the animal forms....
and ALL of the insect forms....
and ALL of the plant life....
and just one massive accident......
I think you are correct, every stage of scientific progress has unambiguously validated the predictions of an intelligently designed v materialistic universe; from created v static/ steady state origins, to quantum v classical physics, the breakdown of Darwinian evolution, and most recently- the information age has provided insights into the deeper designs of the universe that are causing even many die hard atheists like Dawkins to consider the possibility of ID
False. The unknown authors never even knew the temple was rebuilt.
the author seems to know about Antiochus' two campaigns in Egypt (169 and 167 BC), the desecration of the Temple (the "abomination of desolation"), and the fortification of the Akra (a fortress built inside Jerusalem), but he seems to know nothing about the reconstruction of the Temple or about the actual circumstances of Antiochus' death in late 164.
Many modern scholars believe that Daniel 9:27, 11:31 and 12:11 are examples of vaticinium ex eventu (prophecies after the event) relating to Antiochus
Darwinian evolution broke decades ago. Its a non-issue. But what broke it wasn't creationism but new information about evolution that is now our current theory of evolution.I think you are correct, every stage of scientific progress has unambiguously validated the predictions of an intelligently designed v materialistic universe; from created v static/ steady state origins, to quantum v classical physics, the breakdown of Darwinian evolution, and most recently- the information age has provided insights into the deeper designs of the universe that are causing even many die hard atheists like Dawkins to consider the possibility of ID
He did? I'd like a link to that for sure.even many die hard atheists like Dawkins to consider the possibility of ID
Rather revealing that even in your whining about no god being involved you still have to stick him in there....and just one massive accident......
I wonder who has revealed himself more so.....Rather revealing that even in your whining about no god being involved you still have to stick him in there....
let's be honest.....Nope, as it being an accident is not the only other option. There are a plethora of reasons why life has evolved in specific ways.
You can try to yet again use your gift of transference, but at this stage of the game, you are not fooling any one but yourself.I wonder who has revealed himself more so.....
I don't think your avatar works for you
Oh, I completely agree.I seem to be doing just fine.
thank you
You have not pointed out any such fact.I point out the fact that beautiful designs do not happen without a cause.
He did? I'd like a link to that for sure.