A
angellous_evangellous
Guest
Ohhh. :foot:
haha don't worry about it. I thought about just getting off easy.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Ohhh. :foot:
O, I just thought of something better... inspired by the play Titus.
It would be too much trouble than it's worth, but while in prison they amputate the guy's legs, grind everything into sausage, and let that be the only thing they feed him. Cold and bland.
They would tell the guy before or after he eats it... if before, let him go without food for a week or so.
blindfoldedOk, so I'm not a Christian and I am a woman.
I do not want to see him blinded, but I would like him to have to pay for whatever medical treatment she may need (now or in the future) and I think he should be sentenced to a minimum of 20 years.
But it's not halal.
blindfolded
I can't speak for anyone, but it's safe to say Angellous was joking about killing people's families and that the comment was about this discussion, not the issue.
I'm glad you chimed in! And nice hair.
It's supposed to be revolting - which is why the method is so effective.
That is certainly why I asked if it was trolling or what? I didn't get a reply, but now I see a little more clearly at least the method and manner the words were used.
I didn't pick up anything and perhaps I didn't read deeply enough into the lead up to understand.
Thanks for the welcome in.... flattery will get you nowhere..... LoL!!!
I keed I keed. Danke.
I'll let me opinions otherwise rest for now.
Sorry for misunderstanding the way in which you presented itself to me. I was way to caught up in the wtf-ness of the hypothetical story and it's details to see it was a tool for illustrating your point.
I was shocked for sure.
But I don't know if I'd call is a success or effective.
It pretty much just shocked and upset me and nothing else up to this point.
Ameneh Bahrami was the victim of an attack with acid by a man whose marriage proposals she turned down.
She now is blind and badly disfigured and wants her attacker to be blinded too, under the Sharia law of Iran.
One thing I don't understand:
Why was she not given asylum in Barcelona and brought to an hospital for immediate threatment insted of sending her to a shelter for homless people?
She could have keept her left eye had they not forced her to live in a place with bad sanitary conditions.
An eye for an eye, makes a lot of blind people.
Then perhaps they will no longer take eyes?An eye for an eye, makes a lot of blind people.
Would we not, if doing so, become more and more like him?Finally, saying that one is against cruel punishments is just the exact opposite of justice to me, as of course some crimes are just that, cruel. Which means to give justice to the victim, we may have to do something cruel to the attacker, just like what he did.