Unveiled Artist
Veteran Member
Hm. Good explanation. Baptism by blood actually makes more sense (or wine?) than water in respect that Jesus blood saved you rather than water. I can see water baptism as necessary by tradition of the Church in scripture. However, I objectively rather than by experience speaking, I dont see how water is necessary to be baptized in the spirit. I know you quoted scripture above; and, it still baffles me. I do know that Jesus is in the EucharisT.
Forgive the comparison, baptism is like the Eucharist in that the hosts/matter (comp. unblessed water) were consecrated (blessed water) so when thr pentinent take the Eucharist (or baptized) they are in communion in Christ (born again).
The hosts and water are the matter.
Once the hosts are concecrated and water blessed they are no longer "matter" but the former Jesus and the later blessed.
So when the pentinent takes the Eucharist, they are in communion In Christ.
When the pentinent is baptized in water, He is blessed clean by the Holy Spirit.
--
Actually, here is a question that may clear it up. Is the water the "hosts" and once blessed whomever is baptized in it is baptized in Christ as one is in Communion with Him in the concecrated hosts?
Forgive the comparison, baptism is like the Eucharist in that the hosts/matter (comp. unblessed water) were consecrated (blessed water) so when thr pentinent take the Eucharist (or baptized) they are in communion in Christ (born again).
The hosts and water are the matter.
Once the hosts are concecrated and water blessed they are no longer "matter" but the former Jesus and the later blessed.
So when the pentinent takes the Eucharist, they are in communion In Christ.
When the pentinent is baptized in water, He is blessed clean by the Holy Spirit.
--
Actually, here is a question that may clear it up. Is the water the "hosts" and once blessed whomever is baptized in it is baptized in Christ as one is in Communion with Him in the concecrated hosts?
If they are baptized by another person without water, I don't think that would do, but it would be God's call, I suppose, and would depend on the circumstances. The Church teaches about baptism by desire (described above), not based on tradition (that I know of), but on certain verses of scripture. For example, the penitent thief who asked Jesus to remember him when he entered into his kingdom had not been baptized and had no opportunity to be baptized at that point, but Jesus did not hesitate to save him. He received forgiveness along with the very same sanctifying grace that baptism would have provided.
And there are these, among others (not to mean that baptism is unnecessary for those to whom it is available):
"Every one therefore that shall confess me before men, I will also confess him before my Father who is in heaven." (Matthew 10:32)
"He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them; he it is that loveth me. And he that loveth me, shall be loved of my Father: and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him." (John 14:21)
And as it would pertain to baptism by blood (also mentioned above) for a martyr who had not been baptized:
"He that findeth his life, shall lose it: and he that shall lose his life for me, shall find it." (Matthew 10:39)