Was Islam spread by the sword?

[The Emperor of Mankind]

Please quote from Torah where name of your religion has been mentioned by Moses. Right?
Regards

Two things:

1. Why would the Torah name my religion when it came to be thousands of years after the Torah was written in a language that didn't exist at the time the Torah was written?
2. Why would it matter to me whether the Torah could name my religion or not since I'm not a Jew?

 

[paarsurrey]

Two things:

1. Why would the Torah name my religion when it came to be thousands of years after the Torah was written in a language that didn't exist at the time the Torah was written?
2. Why would it matter to me whether the Torah could name my religion or not since I'm not a Jew?

Please note the amendment made in post #3469.
No harm if you give name of your religion if named by Zoroaster in the Gathas. Is it OK now?
Regards

 

[The Emperor of Mankind]

Please note the amendment made in post #3469.
No harm if you give name of your religion if named by Zoroaster in the Gathas. Is it OK now?
Regards

Oh, that's what you meant. Okay, thanks for clarifying.

I don't know the Torah well enough to be able to quote it. Why does it matter if "Judaism" isn't the name spoken by Moses? How can that possibly be significant?

 

[Jabar]

Islam is war, Islam is hate and Islam is everything you deny out of personal ignorance and since it is bound to become a loop, so, it is what it is.

I think you should refrain making false and insulting suppositions.

 

[Subhankar Zac]

I think you should refrain making false and insulting suppositions.

I think you should develop some understanding of "don't be a troll" in this decade itself.

 

[Jabar]

I think you should develop some understanding of "don't be a troll" in this decade itself.

I believe you are describing your own self.

Your dogmatic beliefs of an intellectual fellow gentlemen whose own intellectual capacity is substantially extraordinary in comparison to your inadequate and unsatisfactory are of no congruity.

 

[Subhankar Zac]

I believe you are describing your own self.

Your dogmatic beliefs of an intellectual fellow gentlemen whose own intellectual capacity is substantially extraordinary in comparison to your inadequate and unsatisfactory are of no congruity.

Dogmatic beliefs?
Burns people for no reason, drops people off of buildings, beheads people, all for the war against infidels for a random book allegedly spoken by a faceless deity.
Dogma don't stay static for long in my mind or faith. Once their time is up, they have to go.

 

[Jabar]

Dogmatic beliefs?
Burns people for no reason, drops people off of buildings, beheads people, all for the war against infidels for a random book allegedly spoken by a faceless deity.
Dogma don't stay static for long in my mind or faith. Once their time is up, they have to go.

Burns people off for no reason?

Refrain from insult. No religion teaches people to kill in the name of God.

If there is such, it is ruled out.

Dharma Gurus modify the teachings to fulfill their principles and mislead people.

http://scroll.in/article/718458/most-extremists-in-india-are-not-muslim-they-are-hindu

I am not saying Hindus are terrorists, but every religious group has terrorism, so stop with the generalization. Media and Propaganda is a way to degrade Muslims.

 

[Subhankar Zac]

Burns people off for no reason?

Refrain from insult. No religion teaches people to kill in the name of God.

If there is such, it is ruled out.

Dharma Gurus modify the teachings to fulfill their principles and mislead people.

http://scroll.in/article/718458/most-extremists-in-india-are-not-muslim-they-are-hindu

I am not saying Hindus are terrorists, but every religious group has terrorism, so stop with the generalization. Media and Propaganda is a way to degrade Muslims.

Troll away, and believe whatever you will.
N I didn't say Muslims are terrorists, I said Islam is terrorism and some Muslims are terrorists.
No Hindu scripture speaks of killing people except those who are evil n committed deeds like murder, kidnapping, etc..
N no one Hindus are not terrorists, unlike you, I can see the reality n not stay up all night trolling and making loops in all threads possible.
I follow the Gita, the others could say whatever they wish. I don't follow or believe in other scriptures. It's a diverse group of religion, not a SINGLe fear mongering dogma.
I already know where this is headed n it's 5:30 here, I gotta sleep.
So, feel Free to talk to yourself.

 

[Jabar]

Troll away, and believe whatever you will.
N I didn't say Muslims are terrorists, I said Islam is terrorism and some Muslims are terrorists.
No Hindu scripture speaks of killing people except those who are evil n committed deeds like murder, kidnapping, etc..
N no one Hindus are not terrorists, unlike you, I can see the reality n not stay up all night trolling and making loops in all threads possible.
I follow the Gita, the others could say whatever they wish. I don't follow or believe in other scriptures. It's a diverse group of religion, not a SINGLe fear mongering dogma.
I already know where this is headed n it's 5:30 here, I gotta sleep.
So, feel Free to talk to yourself.

You called me a terrorist?

Are you kidding me, ask anyone on this forum. Anyhow, lets say i were to be a terrorist. Where is your evidence i am a terrorist? Refrain from suppositions and jumping to conclusions too quickly.

There are many Hindu terrorists as there are not.

I would agree that there are Muslim terrorists but there are also not.

I follow the Qur'an, divine scripture, the other do as they wish.

Go to sleep, but remember before making generalizations you should be aware of the premises.

 

[paarsurrey]

Are you aware of the argument from ignorance? Please prove Scientology is wrong since Scientology is incompatible with the ahmablah

I know the argument from knowledge. Ahmadiyya is truthful and peaceful. Please add it to your knowledge.
Regards

 

[serp777]

I know the argument from knowledge. Ahmadiyya is truthful and peaceful. Please add it to your knowledge.
Regards

Its irrelevant and highly questionable. Read the objections to the argument from knowledge and learn about the argument from ignorance. Finally, even if the argument from knowledge is good, then that doesn't prove the Ahmablah over the Bible.

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qualia-knowledge/#4

 

[paarsurrey]

Its irrelevant and highly questionable. Read the objections to the argument from knowledge and learn about the argument from ignorance. Finally, even if the argument from knowledge is good, then that doesn't prove the Ahmablah over the Bible.

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qualia-knowledge/#4

The Argument from knowledge supersedes the argument from argument. So one is wrong again. Bible does not take one to certainty as it is not pristine and secure word of G-d. Right?
Regards

 

[paarsurrey]

serp777 said: ↑
Are you aware of the argument from ignorance? Please prove Scientology is wrong since Scientology is incompatible with the ahmablah

paarsurrey said: ↑
I know the argument from knowledge. Ahmadiyya is truthful and peaceful. Please add it to your knowledge.

serp777 said: ↑
Its irrelevant and highly questionable. Read the objections to the argument from knowledge and learn about the argument from ignorance. Finally, even if the argument from knowledge is good, then that doesn't prove the Ahmablah over the Bible.

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qualia-knowledge/#4

The Argument from knowledge supersedes the argument from ignorance. So one is wrong again. Bible does not take one to certainty as it is not pristine and secure word of G-d. Right?

Anybody, please
Regards

 

[paarsurrey]

Its irrelevant and highly questionable. Read the objections to the argument from knowledge and learn about the argument from ignorance. Finally, even if the argument from knowledge is good, then that doesn't prove the Ahmablah over the Bible.
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qualia-knowledge/#4

Philosophy is not 100% accurate, it has never been.
You are wrong.
Regards

 

[The Emperor of Mankind]

The irony of someone claiming "Philosophy is not 100% accurate, it never has been." while using a philosophical argument to defend their claims about their beliefs...

 

[paarsurrey]

The irony of someone claiming "Philosophy is not 100% accurate, it never has been." while using a philosophical argument to defend their claims about their beliefs...

I did not present any philosophical argument. I gave arguments from Quran, the 100% correct, pristine and secure Word of G-d:

[2:1] In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful.
[2:2] Alif Lam Mim.
[2:3] This is a perfect Book; there is no doubt in it; it is a guidance for the righteous,
[2:4] Who believe in the unseen and observe Prayer, and spend out of what We have provided for them;
[2:5] And who believe in that which has been revealed to thee, and that which was revealed before thee, and they have firm faith in what is yet to come.
[2:6] It is they who follow the guidance of their Lord and it is they who shall prosper.
http://www.alislam.org/quran/search2/showChapter.php?ch=2

Regards

 

[YmirGF]

The irony of someone claiming "Philosophy is not 100% accurate, it never has been." while using a philosophical argument to defend their claims about their beliefs...

That made me laugh.

 

[paarsurrey]

That made me laugh.

Laughter is good for health. One may laugh even louder, no harm . Then please give your argument.

Regards

 

[The Emperor of Mankind]

I did not present any philosophical argument.

Yes you did.

I know the argument from knowledge. Ahmadiyya is truthful and peaceful. Please add it to your knowledge.
Regards

The Argument from knowledge supersedes the argument from argument. So one is wrong again. Bible does not take one to certainty as it is not pristine and secure word of G-d. Right?
Regards

The argument from knowledge is a philosophical one.