hi Odion
Btw, using WikiIslam. Lol. Seriously?
Why not check the BNP for facts about immigration while you're at it?
You expect to find information like that on a Muslim site? If a politician has done a lot of bad things and was/is involved in crime, guess what? You wont find any information about that on
his website. You will get the information from other sources and verify they are not making it up before you can use that information.
So that site lists facts and gives all the
references. Get counter facts and references if you can.
None of those are the Qur'an.
See:
"The Qur'an does not say Muhammad married Aisha when she was 6 and had sex with her when she was 9"
The Qur'an is not a biography of Muhammad. By name, he is only mentioned 4 times in the Qur'an. The Qur'an is not a historical narrative and without the Hadiths and Sirat (which are accepted by the majority of the world's Muslims and Islamic scholars) there would be no Five Pillars, Islam as Muslims know it would be unrecognizable, and there would be little to no historical evidence that a person known as Prophet Muhammad ever existed. Therefore they cannot be ignored. Furthermore, the Qur'an itself permits pedophilia in verse 65:4.
From: wikiislam.net/wiki/Responses_to_Apologetics:_Muhammad_and_Aisha#The_Qur.27an_does_not_say_Muhammad_married_Aisha_when_she_was_6_and_had_sex_with_her_when_she_was_9
(wont let me post links yet)
So the summary of the above quote is that Hadith are important in Islam (especially when multiple Sahih Hadith which say the exact thing).
So no, I don't think Aisha was 6 when betrothed, or 9 when it was consummated.
See:
"Some Islamic sources say Aisha was aged 12, 14, 15, 17, 18 and 21 when Muhammad had sex with her"
All authentic sources of Aisha’s own testimony confirm she was aged nine at the time. These alternate ages have been derived from misquotations, indirect sources, fuzzy dating techniques, and slander, in an attempt to cast doubt upon facts which have been unquestionably accepted by Muslims for almost 1,500 years.
Even today, the vast majority of the world's Muslims acknowledge and accept Aisha's young age and many of these honest Muslims take offense to these lies propagated by western Muslim apologists who are embarrassed by their own prophet's actions. In fact, Islamic scholar and teacher of Fiqh at Sunnipath.com and Livingislam.org, Shaykh Gibril Fouad Haddad's work has been referenced in our refutation to all these claims, which you can read here.
Source: wikiislam.net/wiki/Responses_to_Apologetics:_Muhammad_and_Aisha#Some_Islamic_sources_say_Aisha_was_aged_12.2C_14.2C_15.2C_17.2C_18_and_21_when_Muhammad_had_sex_with_her
So the problem is that the fact Aisha was 6/9 when engaged/married to 51/54 year old Muhammad, is mentioned multiple times in multiple Sahih hadiths.
The other ages 17, 19, whatever - those are not mentioned directly in hadiths and they are derivations and calculations as the quote says and that weak indirect information cannot compare to multiple mentions of
Sahih hadiths, the link to which was provided by Monk Of Reason.
So that did happen and you have no historical evidence to counter-act the massive historical evidence that
directly reports her age as 6 and 9 when engaged/married.
Also scholars agree on those ages so your personal opinion has no weight in comparison to multiple Sahih hadiths and Islamic scholars. I understand this is an embarrassing (or difficult to defend) issue about Islam.
In addition Quran 65:4 permits pedophilia - marriage with girls who havent reached puberty: wikiislam.net/wiki/Pedophilia_in_the_Qur%27an
When you read this page, be sure to read multiple translations, Tafsirs and sayings of Islamic scholars before giving your personal opinion that has once again, little weight in comparison to that evidence and therefore cannot contradict what they are saying.
Thank you.