• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Was the real Jewish Garden of Eden located in Jerusalem?

Greatest I am

Well-Known Member
And I think they did.

But the gardens in Babylon would be a better source to parallel and compete with, so why not create a mythical garden that is no longer in existence since you don't have one of your own.

I believe they did have one of their own which may have been the basis of their myth. It would have been within the royal or temple complex and carved all over the walls.

They just wanted to keep up with the other kings in showing their power over nature.

Regards
DL
 

Greatest I am

Well-Known Member
Nope ;)


Im looking for evidence of any kind, knowing we have mythology.


So if you want to understand this version, then we ask when. A date is the most important part of what your looking for.

Francesca indicated that Genesis was written later but put as chapter 1 of the bible. She refers to the King/God making a mistake and the temple being destroyed. I have forgotten when the temple was destroyed but Eden would be written after that as that destruction is the ejection of A & E from Eden. Analogically speaking.

I will go with her scholarly opinion on Adam being a king that was being punished by Babylon for not paying his masters.

Regards
DL
 

Greatest I am

Well-Known Member
Of course, just ask the talking serpent.

Since scriptures venerate it, I shall.

Matthew 10:16 Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.

Genesis 3 ;3 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made.

Regards
DL
 

roger1440

I do stuff
Since scriptures venerate it, I shall.

Matthew 10:16 Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.

Genesis 3 ;3 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made.

Regards
DL
I was being sarcastic.
 

Greatest I am

Well-Known Member
yes when we take such stories as being literally true, we then get stuck, we then have to try and protect our belief, never admitting that we were wrong, and yes much negative thinking has arisen from the belief, that is still affecting people today.

I agree. Thanks.

Let many Christians and Muslims know that when you can.

Regards
DL
 

Greatest I am

Well-Known Member
When dealing with writings thousands of years old, written by people we don't know, and also written from subjective viewpoints, there ain't a whole lot that we actually do know.

I agree with this on the biblical parts but not on what the scientists and scholars are coming up with.

They are not all correct of course but are getting closer to giving us a picture of how things were and what was myth or not.

The Jews never hid the fact that they were not literalists of their own myths. They are not idol worshipers.

Christianity and Islam, idol worshipers, won the God wars and that is why many mindsets, even in non-believers, are following a literal text.

A shame as then the messages within the myths are lost.

Regards
DL
 

Greatest I am

Well-Known Member
Don't assume that people do things for the worst possible reasons, because it turns your argument into sludge. Assuming people always act for the worst isn't evidence or even true skepticism. You don't know why the female goddesses were not included, full stop. You don't know why Eden is a myth, and you don't know why there is a story about Eden in the Bible.

When something produces a vile outcome, it is logical to think that the writer intended the vile outcome especially when believers maintain the institutionalized vile outcome.

In this case, Jews did not write in the vile outcome. Christianity did and is maintaining the vile outcome of misogyny and inequality.

Regards
DL
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
I agree with this on the biblical parts but not on what the scientists and scholars are coming up with.

They are not all correct of course but are getting closer to giving us a picture of how things were and what was myth or not.

The Jews never hid the fact that they were not literalists of their own myths. They are not idol worshipers.

Christianity and Islam, idol worshipers, won the God wars and that is why many mindsets, even in non-believers, are following a literal text.

A shame as then the messages within the myths are lost.

Regards
DL
What are the scientists and scholars coming up with that you don't agree with, as I'm unclear what you're stating here?
 

Kolibri

Well-Known Member
I do not think there is much argument about how the Jews plagiarized the Sumerian myths.

This is where I differ. Jesus treated the Genesis account as literal.
Since it is within my understanding of Scripture that Jesus was the one man that had a pre-human existence, he would have been an eyewitness not necessarily needing to rely on the accounts written.
So I see the Sumerian myths to have their origin in pre-Flood history, not pre-Flood myth.

The same evidence I have that supports my belief in Jesus being who he said he was, thus gets extended to accept as literal the history he would have known to be literal.
 

Greatest I am

Well-Known Member
What are the scientists and scholars coming up with that you don't agree with, as I'm unclear what you're stating here?

What I am saying is that way too many have been reading scriptures as literal and historic regardless of how they have to make pretzels of their brains to make their literal reading and history match.

With research like what Israel Finkelstein is coming up with, more will recognize just how much of the Jewish story is impossible to read literally or historically.

Idol worshiping Christians and Muslims especially need to grow up and stop trying to force myths down the throats of intelligent people.

At the present time Islam is trying to produce it's own Dark Age of free thought and want to follow Christianity's old example of an Inquisition.

Christians and Muslims are beginning to ***** about being verbally attacked by non-believers and that will hopefully increase so that we might rid ourselves of religions that are immoral, homophobic and misogynous so that we may civilize our world without fearing fools who believe in a supernatural guy in the sky.

The world is getting red up with idol worshiping and dangerous literalist fools like Christians and Muslims.

Regards
DL
 

Greatest I am

Well-Known Member
How would you know?

How would you know?

I looked and asked Jews. I did not find any stupid enough to believe in talking animals.

Bill Moyers Journal . Watch & Listen | PBS

Rabbi Hillel, the older contemporary of Jesus, said that when asked to sum up the whole of Jewish teaching, while he stood on one leg, said, "The Golden Rule. That which is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor. That is the Torah. And everything else is only commentary. Now, go and study it."

Please listen as to what is said about literal reading.

"Origen, the great second or third century Greek commentator on the Bible said that it is absolutely impossible to take these texts literally. You simply cannot do so. And he said, "God has put these sort of conundrums and paradoxes in so that we are forced to seek a deeper meaning."

RaceandHistory.com - Doubting the Story of Exodus

--------------------


Regards
DL
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member

Greatest I am

Well-Known Member
This is where I differ. Jesus treated the Genesis account as literal.
Since it is within my understanding of Scripture that Jesus was the one man that had a pre-human existence, he would have been an eyewitness not necessarily needing to rely on the accounts written.
So I see the Sumerian myths to have their origin in pre-Flood history, not pre-Flood myth.

The same evidence I have that supports my belief in Jesus being who he said he was, thus gets extended to accept as literal the history he would have known to be literal.

First. There is more than one Jesus in scriptures. You have your Western Roman Jesus who is a Roman *** kissing stooge.

That is the immoral Jesus you follow, and here is how I deal with your poor morals if you plan on using him as your scapegoat whipping boy savior.

--------------
Human sacrifice is evil and your God demanding one and accepting one is evil.

You trying to profit from that evil is evil. Do just a bit of thinking and you will agree.

Imagine you have two children. One of your children does something wrong – say it curses, or throws a temper tantrum, or something like that. In fact, say it does this on a regular basis, and you continually forgive your child, but it never seems to change.

Now suppose one day you’ve had enough, you need to do something different. You still wish to forgive your child, but nothing has worked. Do you go to your second child, your good child, and punish it to atone for the sins of the first?

In fact, if you ever saw a parent on the street punish one of their children for the actions of their other child, how would you react? Would you support their decision, or would you be offended? Because God punished Jesus -- his good child -- for the sins of his other children.

Interestingly, some historical royal families would beat their slaves when their own children did wrong – you should not, after all, ever beat a prince. The question is: what kind of lesson does that teach the child who actually did the harm? Does it teach them to be a better person, to stop doing harm, or does it teach them both that they won't themselves be punished, and also that punishing other people is normal? I know that's not a lesson I would want to teach my children, and I suspect it's not a lesson most Christians would want to teach theirs. So why does God?

For me, that’s at least one significant reason I find Jesus’ atonement of our sin to be morally repugnant – of course, that’s assuming Jesus ever existed; that original sin actually exists; that God actually exists; etc.

Having another innocent person suffer for the wrongs you have done, --- so that you might escape responsibility for having done them, --- is immoral.

Do you agree?

----------------------------------

As a Gnostic Christian, I see a more Eastern Jesus which I use and which you have never heard a priest preach as then he would lose your respect for lying to you all these years.

Matthew 6:22 The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light.

John 14:23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.

Luke 17:21 Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.

Romans 8:29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.

-----------------------------------

As to the Jesus you know, who you say literally believed the O.T., look again for the first time.

That Jesus said, when refusing to stone a man on the Sabbath for working, that the Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath.

That also means that he would say that religions and Gods are made for man and not man for religions or Gods.

Those are created to serve man.

It is quite obvious that an omnipotent all powerful God would have no use for puny men unless he was a really ------


To think that a God would want or need anything from us is to make his desires a slave to man.

Jesus believed in the Jewish Divine Council.

Romans 8:29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.

Join me as his brethren. The Jesus I know wanted to free us from the tyranny of Gods.

Choose that Jesus and scrap your immoral scapegoat.

Be a free man and God instead of a slave to a God you can never know.

Let me explain why you and I are Gods (work in progress) using Christian and Jewish myths.


This Gnostic Christian’s apology for calling myself God.

Adam and Eve became as Gods when they gained a moral sense and no longer had their mind cut off from intelligent thought. As our primordial ancestors, we inherit that same trait even though Christianity wrongly thinks that to be evil and a fall. Retaining dominion over the earth, humans never revoked this inherited trait of a moral sense, --- and the right for man to judge himself. Jesus highlights this when he took the seat of judgement at God’s right hand.

When I use terms like “I am God”, or “you are God”, I am not speaking of the traditional miracle working God of scriptures and myths. He does not exist as far as we can know as he has never made an appearance to prove his reality.

What I am trying to convey to you by saying that you are a God in your own right is to be master of yourself and you need not be a sheep. You can, as Jesus says, pick up your burdens and responsibilities for your sins and follow his mind set. Be a shepherd. Lead by example.

What I am trying to convey is that the only God you can ever know is the good you find within yourself. It's your ideal of God and of the Jesus or Christ mind. That is quite different from me or someone thinking they are the traditional creator God, or thinking that they are more than anyone else. Both Jesus and the Christ in these myths are for equality. Not the misogyny that we presently enjoy. That is another topic though. We are to be co-equal with Jesus.

Romans 8:29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.

Jesus would explain this concept as one just seeing that they have joined God’s Divine Council by embracing his own Christ mind. Or better said, as this is the more eastern Jesus, we activate our pineal gland and open our third eye.

Matthew 6:22 The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light.

John 14:23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.

Luke 17:21 Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.

Divine Council - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regards
DL
 

Greatest I am

Well-Known Member
So, when you said "the Jews" you were referring to the pitifully small handful with which you've spoken, and when you said "never" you were referring to the scrap of time over which you've had these conversations. Thanks for sharing.

Thanks for showing your regard for Jewish commentators and scholars just because you do not like what they say.

Regards
DL
 

Kolibri

Well-Known Member
First. There is more than one Jesus in scriptures. You have your Western Roman Jesus who is a Roman *** kissing stooge.

That is the immoral Jesus you follow, and here is how I deal with your poor morals if you plan on using him as your scapegoat whipping boy savior.

--------------
Human sacrifice is evil and your God demanding one and accepting one is evil.

You trying to profit from that evil is evil. Do just a bit of thinking and you will agree.

Imagine you have two children. One of your children does something wrong – say it curses, or throws a temper tantrum, or something like that. In fact, say it does this on a regular basis, and you continually forgive your child, but it never seems to change.

Now suppose one day you’ve had enough, you need to do something different. You still wish to forgive your child, but nothing has worked. Do you go to your second child, your good child, and punish it to atone for the sins of the first?

In fact, if you ever saw a parent on the street punish one of their children for the actions of their other child, how would you react? Would you support their decision, or would you be offended? Because God punished Jesus -- his good child -- for the sins of his other children.

Interestingly, some historical royal families would beat their slaves when their own children did wrong – you should not, after all, ever beat a prince. The question is: what kind of lesson does that teach the child who actually did the harm? Does it teach them to be a better person, to stop doing harm, or does it teach them both that they won't themselves be punished, and also that punishing other people is normal? I know that's not a lesson I would want to teach my children, and I suspect it's not a lesson most Christians would want to teach theirs. So why does God?

For me, that’s at least one significant reason I find Jesus’ atonement of our sin to be morally repugnant – of course, that’s assuming Jesus ever existed; that original sin actually exists; that God actually exists; etc.

Having another innocent person suffer for the wrongs you have done, --- so that you might escape responsibility for having done them, --- is immoral.

Do you agree?

----------------------------------

As a Gnostic Christian, I see a more Eastern Jesus which I use and which you have never heard a priest preach as then he would lose your respect for lying to you all these years.

Matthew 6:22 The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light.

John 14:23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.

Luke 17:21 Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.

Romans 8:29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.

-----------------------------------

As to the Jesus you know, who you say literally believed the O.T., look again for the first time.

That Jesus said, when refusing to stone a man on the Sabbath for working, that the Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath.

That also means that he would say that religions and Gods are made for man and not man for religions or Gods.

Those are created to serve man.

It is quite obvious that an omnipotent all powerful God would have no use for puny men unless he was a really ------


To think that a God would want or need anything from us is to make his desires a slave to man.

Jesus believed in the Jewish Divine Council.

Romans 8:29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.

Join me as his brethren. The Jesus I know wanted to free us from the tyranny of Gods.

Choose that Jesus and scrap your immoral scapegoat.

Be a free man and God instead of a slave to a God you can never know.

Let me explain why you and I are Gods (work in progress) using Christian and Jewish myths.


This Gnostic Christian’s apology for calling myself God.

Adam and Eve became as Gods when they gained a moral sense and no longer had their mind cut off from intelligent thought. As our primordial ancestors, we inherit that same trait even though Christianity wrongly thinks that to be evil and a fall. Retaining dominion over the earth, humans never revoked this inherited trait of a moral sense, --- and the right for man to judge himself. Jesus highlights this when he took the seat of judgement at God’s right hand.

When I use terms like “I am God”, or “you are God”, I am not speaking of the traditional miracle working God of scriptures and myths. He does not exist as far as we can know as he has never made an appearance to prove his reality.

What I am trying to convey to you by saying that you are a God in your own right is to be master of yourself and you need not be a sheep. You can, as Jesus says, pick up your burdens and responsibilities for your sins and follow his mind set. Be a shepherd. Lead by example.

What I am trying to convey is that the only God you can ever know is the good you find within yourself. It's your ideal of God and of the Jesus or Christ mind. That is quite different from me or someone thinking they are the traditional creator God, or thinking that they are more than anyone else. Both Jesus and the Christ in these myths are for equality. Not the misogyny that we presently enjoy. That is another topic though. We are to be co-equal with Jesus.

Romans 8:29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.

Jesus would explain this concept as one just seeing that they have joined God’s Divine Council by embracing his own Christ mind. Or better said, as this is the more eastern Jesus, we activate our pineal gland and open our third eye.

Matthew 6:22 The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light.

John 14:23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.

Luke 17:21 Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.

Divine Council - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regards
DL
Where did this tirade come from where you tell me what Jesus I follow?
You do not know what I believe. You do know know who I understand Jesus to be.
'My' Jesus is very different from the one taught by most denominations.
Nor do you have an accurate understanding what I feel and believe about personal responsibility.

This is a set of assumptions and generalizations that I am frankly too tired at the moment to even bother to finish reading.
 
Top