The word is "Monogenes" which is also used in scripture to describe firstborn humans. There is no qualification in the Bible that this word, as it is assigned to Jesus, is any different to any other "firstborn" or "only child".
Church scholars with a trinity to support have to read it onto the text. Since "the Word" (Logos) is not the only spirit "son of God" mentioned in the scriptures, he is definitely "firstborn" or "only begotten" in a unique or heavenly sense. He was the first and only direct creation of his Father (Rev 3:14) and he was used exclusively by the Father in all other creation, as a "master worker" (or "craftsman") but he is never called the Creator. (Prov 8:22, 30, 31) Jehovah alone is Creator and his firstborn was working alongside his Father in fashioning the raw materials that God had brought into being. This is what the Bible teaches....father and son were the "us" and "our" in Genesis 1....not as one "godhead" but as two separate entities. Was the pre-human Jesus a divine spirt, unique in all creation? Yes he was...but was he equal with his Father....NEVER!
Please provide a scripture where Jesus ever stated that he was equal to his Father.
The concept of a trinity is not found in the Bible. It is an introduced doctrine. Nowhere will you find a godhead mentioned as three gods in one entity. There is a reason why Jews do not believe in a triune God.....he never was part of Israel's belief system. Not from day one was Jehovah ever presented to them as anything but a single entity. Since Jesus was Jewish and taught his apostles from Jewish scripture, there is not one single mention of Jesus as anything but the "son of God". The title given to him by Christendom, "God the Son" does not exist anywhere in the scriptures.
The trinity did not exist as doctrine in "the church" until the fourth century when apostasy had well and truly taken over, as Jesus had foretold.
The trinity is a fraud! It is a blasphemy swallowed by a religious system that has no idea what Christianity ever was.
It is the "weeds" foretold by Jesus. You seem to have no idea how far back the rot goes. You accept what has been taught to you all your life without ever understanding how serious a deviation Christendom is from what Jesus taught.
How clever to disguise three gods in one godhead...that means no polytheism.......right? Sure it does.
Oh, that explains everything........not. Let's examine your scriptural "evidence"..shall we?
And this proves what?
You seem to overlook the fact that Thomas was demonstrating a lack of faith and his expression is one of shock. Was Jesus a "mighty one" to Thomas? This is what "theos" (god) means in Greek. It is not a word used exclusively for the Father. The shocked expression of a man expressing disbelief is hardly something to build a doctrine upon.
RS reads: “Of the Son he says, ‘Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever.’” (
KJ, NE, TEV, Dy, JB, NAB have similar renderings.) However,
NW reads: “But with reference to the Son: ‘God is your throne forever and ever.’” (
AT, Mo, TC, By convey the same idea.)
Which rendering is harmonious with the context? The preceding verses say that
God is speaking, not that he is being addressed; and the following verse uses the expression “God, thy God,” showing that the one addressed is not the Most High God but is a worshiper of that God.
Hebrews 1:8 quotes from
Psalm 45:6, which originally was addressed to a human king of Israel. Obviously, the Bible writer of this psalm did not think that this human king was Almighty God. Rather,
Psalm 45:6, in
RS, reads “Your divine throne.” (
NE says, “Your throne is like God’s throne.”
JP [verse 7]: “Thy throne given of God.”) Solomon, who was possibly the king originally addressed in
Psalm 45, was said to sit “upon Jehovah’s throne.” (
1 Chron. 29:23,
NW) In harmony with the fact that God is the “throne,” or Source and Upholder of Christ’s kingship,
Daniel 7:13, 14 and Luke 1:32 show that God confers such authority on him.
Since God is the source of his holy spirit and the power behind the accomplishment of his will, this scripture is not proof of a trinity. Inference does not a doctrine make. It is God's spirit and God's son.....so all belong to him but are not a single godhead unless you want to read that into the text.
If there are no direct statements by either God or his Christ in the Bible, we cannot assume that a scripture says something we want to believe....especially not in connection with the very foundation doctrine of all faiths...WHO IS GOD?
We cannot worship a God we do know know. If we do not know him...he cannot know us.
You can infer whatever you like if you are looking for scripture to support what you want to believe. But reading these things into the text doesn't make that interpretation correct.
The Bible teaches that there is one Creator...Yahweh (Jehovah) He was the single God of Israel and therefore the same God that Jesus both served and worshipped. (Luke 4:8) He continued to regard Jehovah as his God even after his return to heaven. (Rev 3:12) Any comment on that? Or the fact that Jesus called his Father "the only true God" without including himself. (John 17:3)
You and I could swap scripture till the cows come home....but it won't make a difference if we are determined to stick with what we know, despite the proofs furnished. change is hard! But it's what is required if we are searching for the truth.
At the end of the day, we will all determine for ourselves what we accept as truth. This is why God's judgment of us is so fair. No one is coerced to believe one way or the other. We place ourselves on either the road to life or the road to death by our own desire to believe what we want to believe. It tells God what is in our hearts.
No one can come to the son unless the Father "draws" them. (John 6:44) So God is the reader of hearts and will only reveal his truth to those he considers "worthy" of it. (Matt 10:11-15) We do not determine our own 'worthiness'.
I have come out of Christendom, so I have been on both sides of this fence. I have examined all the scriptures that are put forward to support the trinity and found it to be a fraud of colossal proportions.
I see clearly the pagan origin of much of Christendom's celebrations and how none of them are serving God's interests, but their own. (2 Cor 6:14-18; 2 Thess 2:9-12) They also serve the interests of the world's commercial system, not promoting the unadulterated worship of God.