If I ever get to those gates, I'm going to ask St P three questions:
Is Jimi there?
Is Kurt there?
Is Janis there?
No? OK. I'm off downstairs...
As Twain said, "Heaven for the climate, hell for the company."
If it existed, it sounds so unutterably dull that after a few thousand years people would be begging for death.
Believers never ask why so many angels rebelled in heaven after having a first-hand look at it. It certainly wasn't anything they wanted.
And what souls wouldn't, given infinite time, eventually want to leave as well? Believers tell us that their god doesn't want robots with no free will and unable to make choices, which is why it gave us free will, but we don't hear how that works in heaven. If souls there still have free will, they will eat forbidden apples in heaven eventually. And if there is no free will, then there are the robots as believers call them.
Here's a hypothetical. At death, you get a chance to choose immortality or the permanent extinction of your consciousness then and there. Either choice is irreversible, and you don't get to preview the afterlife before deciding. What do you choose?
That's easy for me. The possibility of eternal consciousness with no hope of escape and no way to know how much of it will be unpleasant or just how unpleasant it might be after billions of billions of billions of years (and that's not even a percent of a percent of the total) ought to cause great dread and angst.
Imagine choosing consciousness and eventually regretting it, but you're trapped awake to endure whatever unknown things befall you. You'd spend eternity regretting that choice, something that can't happen if one chooses endless sleep instead.
According to the Bible, everything is made of gold and gemstones and whoever goes there will be singing praises to god ‘forever and ever’.
Sounds like Mar-a-Lago with its golden toilets and its resident black whole of endless need for praise.
now you talk with dead people perhaps?
You pray to Jesus.
I believe you are misunderstanding what Jesus meant. Many people, including back in the first century forward, certainly misunderstood in various ways what Jesus was actually saying.
I guess that you can't see why that's not a divine teacher. A divine teacher would be clear and unambiguous. Many mortals are, so why not a god? Nobody's arguing about what Sagan meant, for example. There are no denominations of Sagan understanding.
you should have wondered, ‘How can Christendom have Christ’s truth, when they’ve been disobedient to Christ by killing their brothers during war (John 13:34,35; 15:17), joining the world in its conflicts (John 15:19)?’
This gets back to my comment above. Not much of a teacher if in your opinion most Christians didn't take Jesus' points.
Are you saying JW’s heckled you? We don’t resort to such tactics.
That's been my experience with JWs as well, although my experience is limited to people knocking at my door and posters here on RF (and an earlier but now defunct similar message board).
Another poster wrote, "I believe when confronted with the truth JWs flee." I described my relatively recent experiences with a couple of JWs who gave up on me in less than five minutes when I disagreed with them about the world and life, which they saw as very negative even though I'll bet their lives were pretty good as was mine.
I told them that I am happy and found the world a mixed bag, but like most of the people around me, my life was good. If theirs wasn't, it was because of bad luck (health) or maybe bad decisions (mates) - not that the world was a terrible place or that there wasn't the opportunity for many to live safely and comfortably.
As you know from my previous telling of this encounter to you, they were friendly and polite, but after they heard that, they thanked me and left. I wouldn't describe that as fleeing, although one might make a case that they were afraid of the truth.
Still,
afraid would not be my word. They had their own truth and thought I had none. I think that they considered me a dead end, and they were correct. They had no chance of attracting me to their Kingdom Hall, but it's interesting how quickly they concluded that an on what basis.
But you can sense the disapproval and condemnation of one denomination for another in those words just because they are very different.
in this instance, you’re basing your beliefs on ‘what you want to believe.’
That's how the outsiders sees all denominations. You're a JW because that's what you chose to believe. Somebody else chooses Pentecostalism and another Mormonism - all radically different and all choices reflecting what they prefer.
And you say that we are the “least knowledgeable” about the Bible? Why are you writing these things?
Now for three things I don't like about Abrahamic religion:
[1] It's divisive. Isn't that what every denomination says about denominations that are very different from theirs? The Catholics say so about the Protestants and vice-versa, and your denomination disesteems them both as do they yours. And that's what you were just experiencing by another poster using words implying a fear of truth to describe yours.
The day is coming - soon - when Jehovah God will deal with your “spirits”, and you’ll find out the truth. I hope you’ll be able to accept it.
[2] The threats, sometimes implied, sometimes explicit.
For those who are “chosen” (by God) to go to Heaven
[3] The exclusivity. The sense of being chosen above others, of there being people that are unacceptable to a good god because they didn't guess correctly.