Thief
Rogue Theologian
Saying 'first' says there must be a beginning. There doesn't have to be.
So any scheme of regression simply doesn't work for you?
Someone had to be first.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Saying 'first' says there must be a beginning. There doesn't have to be.
So any scheme of regression simply doesn't work for you?
Someone had to be first.
Some thing existed once existence was an option. Did god choose to exist or god simply exists? Without god choosing to exist there is no reason to think he willed anything, once god exists that means existence is real at that point, i.e. substance.
OK, decent opinion.Looks to me as the proclaimation...I AM!...to be an affirmative.
Formation kinda works. There isn't any sort of ex nihilo though. Spirit is a substance or it is non-existent.The formation of substance.....as proof.
Some of what you quote is correct.
If you review your postings in this thread.....you will see you use whatever quote you care to....to your convenience.
At this point I doubt you believe in anything.
You just quote.
As for God....was, is and shall always be....
He was there at the beginning....as Creator.
Spirit first.
That must be true because you were there, witnessing the whole shebang in your very own little head. Blankee, please![/COLOR]
hey Thief,
Don't you think that your given thought process is somewhat circular ?
From where did your creator come, to create all that wasn't there yet ?
Don't make any sense, from one infinity to another, somewhat circular I must say. At what "point" was your creator, outside of the singularity.
Baffling at best, confusing at worst.
~
'mud
OK, decent opinion.
Formation kinda works. There isn't any sort of ex nihilo though. Spirit is a substance or it is non-existent.
edit: Unseen is another matter, unseen doesn't mean intangible.
Some thing existed once existence was an option. Did god choose to exist or god simply exists? Without god choosing to exist there is no reason to think he willed anything, once god exists that means existence is real at that point, i.e. substance.
The creation moves in circles.
Those are some BIG mother jumping fingers! One day, God is going to put the finger on you, buddy, then *SNAP* *CRACKLE* *POP*, and: "Where were YOU on the night of the Big Bang? It'll all be over in the snap of a finger, or in the sound of one hand clapping.I say it is the spin that proves God did it.
Without the pinch and snap of His fingers....the expansion would be no more that a hollow sphere of energy ever larger moment by moment.
So then....the universe 'is'.....and God 'is' the Cause.....?
So then....the universe 'is'.....and God 'is' the Cause.....?
Whatever caused itself which would have to be just existence, existing, being.
"To be is to be perceived" but no sense organs are necessary, cause and effect is all that is needed.
Existing would be the first cause.
Cause and effect is a matter of change, things do change.
Does something necessarily have a cause simply because it exists, or seems to exist?
Whatever caused itself which would have to be just existence, existing, being.
"To be is to be perceived" but no sense organs are necessary, cause and effect is all that is needed.
Does something necessarily have a cause simply because it exists, or seems to exist?
Hence that primordial proclamation....'I AM!'....