outhouse
Atheistically
I do believe in life after death.
.
You have all these opinions, and all are known mythology.
Scientifically life after death does not exist, and has nothing at all to do with what came before the big expansion.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I do believe in life after death.
.
You have all these opinions, and all are known mythology.
Scientifically life after death does not exist, and has nothing at all to do with what came before the big expansion.
What are you waiting for?
For you to stop the nonsense in a science thread.
Your position is not only not of science, it is not of reason, nor logic, it is your own ego fighting to make your opinion count while it can.
It doesn't count, no one cares about your sprit first nonsense except you. Because you invented it.
You have all these opinions, and all are known mythology.
Scientifically life after death does not exist, and has nothing at all to do with what came before the big expansion.
I find the whole "life after death does not exist" thing incredibly hilarious.
There is only reality, from which organic life emerges. Some of it disintegrates, while also creating new generations as time goes on.
My death, nor yours, negates life automatically as a whole. After I die, trillions upon trillions of lifeforms continue to blossom. Some of them continue to think. Some of them continue to bear self-aware consciousness.
So now, life after individual death does not seize to exist. Only a node within the collective (that is the life itself) shuts down.
Now I know that all of this seem like an incredible and exceptional event of nit-picking taking place on the forums, but in actuality, it is not. Its important to understand that life indeed prevails beyond death - through reproduction of species. It is the whole idea, that the gene material is preserved, that "genes live on". It is the purpose of life itself, to live on.
We, as individuals, nodes of the collective, die. Life, as the continuum, lives on.
So yes, there indeed is life after death - just not ours.
Or something. I knew that you meant it as in "does our identity carry on", which certainly doesn't. I just found it perplexing that people think of it as whether "life" carries on. Of course it does. Its the whole point.
Theology makes good sense to me.
Your disdain is noted.
I find the whole "life after death does not exist" thing incredibly hilarious.
There is only reality, from which organic life emerges. Some of it disintegrates, while also creating new generations as time goes on.
My death, nor yours, negates life automatically as a whole. After I die, trillions upon trillions of lifeforms continue to blossom. Some of them continue to think. Some of them continue to bear self-aware consciousness.
So now, life after individual death does not seize to exist. Only a node within the collective (that is the life itself) shuts down.
Now I know that all of this seem like an incredible and exceptional event of nit-picking taking place on the forums, but in actuality, it is not. Its important to understand that life indeed prevails beyond death - through reproduction of species. It is the whole idea, that the gene material is preserved, that "genes live on". It is the purpose of life itself, to live on.
We, as individuals, nodes of the collective, die. Life, as the continuum, lives on.
So yes, there indeed is life after death - just not ours.
Or something. I knew that you meant it as in "does our identity carry on", which certainly doesn't. I just found it perplexing that people think of it as whether "life" carries on. Of course it does. Its the whole point.
I find the whole "life after death does not exist" thing incredibly hilarious.
There is only reality, from which organic life emerges. Some of it disintegrates, while also creating new generations as time goes on.
My death, nor yours, negates life automatically as a whole. After I die, trillions upon trillions of lifeforms continue to blossom. Some of them continue to think. Some of them continue to bear self-aware consciousness.
So now, life after individual death does not seize to exist. Only a node within the collective (that is the life itself) shuts down.
Now I know that all of this seem like an incredible and exceptional event of nit-picking taking place on the forums, but in actuality, it is not. Its important to understand that life indeed prevails beyond death - through reproduction of species. It is the whole idea, that the gene material is preserved, that "genes live on". It is the purpose of life itself, to live on.
We, as individuals, nodes of the collective, die. Life, as the continuum, lives on.
So yes, there indeed is life after death - just not ours.
Or something. I knew that you meant it as in "does our identity carry on", which certainly doesn't. I just found it perplexing that people think of it as whether "life" carries on. Of course it does. Its the whole point.
As in? ...the universe exists....because of God...
The Human Route
By Zen Master Seung Sahn
Coming empty-handed,
going empty-handed -- that is human.
When you are born, where do you come from?
When you die, where do you go?
Life is like a floating cloud which appears.
Death is like a floating cloud which disappears.
The floating cloud itself originally does not exist.
Life and death, coming and going, are also like that.
But there is one thing which always remains clear.
It is pure and clear, not depending on life and death.
Then what is the one pure and clear thing?
*****
So what does the discussion of life and death have to do with the BB? Everything. Because, like the floating cloud, like the temporal self, the universe also does not originally exist as the universe. All existence is merely a temporal manifestation of the 'one thing which always remains clear.', and that is 'not subject to birth and death'. That which is subject to birth and death is temporal, and therefore, illusory. But your true nature is not subject to birth and death. You are in reality, as Alan Watts tells us, 'the Indestructible Sunyata' itself, but you fail to realize this very fact because you are lost in duality and the world of Identification. That is to say, you think the identity you are now attached to is real; that there exists a self that is born and that dies. That is your maya. When you awaken from this slumber, you will see clearly, via your true nature, the illusory nature of the state of Identification.
'Thou has nor youth nor age, but, as it were,
an after-dinner sleep,
dreaming on both.'
TS Elliot
No matter that I point this out; you will continue to firmly believe this 'material' world to be reality, and your temporal identity to be the real McCoy, until your real awakening. But that is just how good the illusion is. It is said that, should you come face to face with the Devil, do not be afraid of him; just compliment him on the quality of his illusion.
So this item you believe in cannot speak the words...'I AM!'.....?
And you would refrain doing so .....as if you could?
If your non-existence is the goal.....why speak at all?
I then anticipate ....no response.
Neither existence nor non-existence is the goal; non-dual being is. The awakened state of oneness is the I AM itself. It is the universe itself; it is everything,and it is no-thing. 'I AM' is the expression of this pure, awakened state of consciousness. It is 'that one pure and clear thing', Seung refers to. It is The Unborn, and is, therefore, deathless. So when Yeshu tells us that 'Before Abraham was, I Am', he is saying he (his essence) is not a product of history; not subject to birth and death. He is the Alpha and the Omega; he has always been in this eternal Present Moment though the worlds may come and go.
'You' just couldn't help 'yourself'......could 'you'?
Speaking of God as Creator?......good for 'me'.
As I explained to LOM, my use of "I" is purely out of convention. There is no agent of being called "I", and there is no agent of 'creation' called 'God'. There is not even creation. If you are of the school that holds to a creation out of nothing, then your 'Creator' is a magician, a shape-shifter, and the 'material' world is not so 'material' at all, but more of an illusion. Well, surprise!
Back to that ...bang your head till it bleeds ...idea.
Nothing is real.....yeah right!
Does that prove that the material world is 'real', or just that it is a totally convincing illusion? You bang your head; there is pain and blood; therefore, the wall is real 'stuff', right? When you dream, there is dream-pain and dream-thirst that are not real. When you awaken onto this sleep-dream level, the same is true. Only when you truly awaken into the 'I Am' do you know for certain that you have been dreaming all along.
Want to play the dream card?
Sure.
As soon as you are dead your dreams are what you have.....
and you get to share them...with everyone else.
You entered this world naked you leave the same way.
So...now do you want to play the 'wake up' card?