Jeremiah
Well-Known Member
If all things that possess intelligence must be created by intelligence, what intelligence created God?
Pixie dust.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If all things that possess intelligence must be created by intelligence, what intelligence created God?
Most theists present creation as a FACT though, not a belief.There is no actual logic that leads to an eternal intelligence. If one is honest with themselves, they should admit that it is simply based on faith.
That's alright. Doesn't mean that it is a fact. And it doesn't mean there is any logic behind what they are saying.Most theists present creation as a FACT though, not a belief.
Yes, for the creation of intelligence.Mestamia said:Yes it does.
The first part: intelligence is required for the creation of intelligence
flat out states that intelligence is required.
No, I did not.Here you move the goal posts.
Indeed. The first leaves open the possibility of an uncreated intelligence, that therefore does not fall under the requirement for a previous intelligence. The second, similarly, leaves open the possibility of a Chicken not born, but brought about through other means, that does not fall under the requirements of hatching from an egg.Here they are together for your convenience:intelligence is required for the creation of intelligence
All chickens that are born must hatch from an egg
Using that same logic though, why do you assume the universe had to be created? Couldn't it just have existed always?Yes, for the creation of intelligence.
No, I did not.
Indeed. The first leaves open the possibility of an uncreated intelligence, that therefore does not fall under the requirement for a previous intelligence. The second, similarly, leaves open the possibility of a Chicken not born, but brought about through other means, that does not fall under the requirements of hatching from an egg.
I didn't say the Bible was factual, I said most theists present it as such.I.S.L.A. says
Most theists present creation as a FACT though, not a belief.
UNTRUE, facts can be proven. creation is only faith based, a belief. the bible is not a basis for facts. it is faith based.
I.S.L.A.M617 is correct in this respect. I don't know if I would say most, but many theists do present creation as a FACT. That is why there was such a great debate over whether or not Intelligent Design (just a fancy word for Creationism) should be taught in school. It was not faith based, it was trying to claim it was factual base. Even more, if you ask many theists, they will tell you that yes, for a fact, creation is true. That it is a fact, not just a mere belief.I.S.L.A. says
Most theists present creation as a FACT though, not a belief.
UNTRUE, facts can be proven. creation is only faith based, a belief. the bible is not a basis for facts. it is faith based.
If all things that possess intelligence must be created by intelligence, what intelligence created God?
If all things that possess intelligence must be created by intelligence, what intelligence created God?
Good one lolChuck Norris.
Boo-Ya!
Whether the universe had a beginning seems more a province of science than logic to me...ISLAM said:Using that same logic though, why do you assume the universe had to be created? Couldn't it just have existed always?
It has been a while, but as I remember, the evidence points to the universe having a begining in the Big Bang...Whatever you want to call it, why can't that be the possibility?
The only thing I have been insistent on in this thread is that the two statements:Why are you so insistent on intelligent creation if intelligence is not required to make intelligence?
So you don't believe in evolution then?Intelligence is required to create intelligence
and
There is an eternal intelligence
Read my post again.So you don't believe in evolution then?
No it doesn't - we have no idea what, if anything, came before the big bang or any period prior to the planck time. There is no more evidence that the Big Bang was the "beginning" of the universe than there is that, before the big bang, the entire universe consisted of giant fish-monsters.It has been a while, but as I remember, the evidence points to the universe having a begining in the Big Bang...
If intelligence can be eternal than intelligence does not require creation. Whether you admit it or not, it's entirely contradictory.The only thing I have been insistent on in this thread is that the two statements:
Intelligence is required to create intelligence
and
There is an eternal intelligence
are logically consistant.