What evidence for God

[Orias]

How exactly do you define "know"?

"Truth" without doubt.

 

[Orias]

I never said I made the rules, science and physics did.

I never said you did. And no, they didn't.

When I said "you" I was referencing you, as "God". "God" is infallible (dogmatically so).

 

[Where Is God]

"Truth" without doubt.

So explain to me how we do not "know" anything?

 

[Orias]

So explain to me how we do not "know" anything?

There is always someone to doubt something.

 

[Where Is God]

I never said you did. And no, they didn't.

When I said "you" I was referencing you, as "God". "God" is infallible (dogmatically so).

So you are saying that science and physics do not regulate anything and everything?

 

[Orias]

So you are saying that science and physics do not regulate anything and everything?

What can they prove?

 

[Where Is God]

There is always someone to doubt something.

You cannot generalize "we" as a select few that oppose everything proven to them.

 

[Orias]

You cannot generalize "we" as a select few that oppose everything proven to them.

I never said "we", and there will always be doubt. It's part of rationalization, human nature.

Nothing has been proven. Literally.

 

[Where Is God]

What can they prove?

How everything works. Can you jump 100 feet without the aid of machines?

 

[Orias]

How everything works. Can you jump 100 feet without the aid of machines?

How can one "jump" at all?

 

[Where Is God]

This statement could very well be applied to the Opposition, and lacks an onus of justification.

Since we do know nothing.

Actually, you did say "we". How can we not prove something?

 

[Where Is God]

How can one "jump" at all?

Using his muscles? You seem to be typing. How do you do that? Would you like to argue that you are not typing?

 

[Orias]

Actually, you did say "we". How can we not prove something?

My bad, I thought you meant I said "we" in the quote below.

And who knows? Why don't you try it?

There is always someone to doubt something.

 

[Orias]

Using his muscles? You seem to be typing. How do you do that? Would you like to argue that you are not typing?

I would argue that what I'm doing is a label, not necessarily relevant or even directly specific to what I am doing, since I am also watching UFC Fight Night Live.

 

[Where Is God]

My bad, I thought you meant I said "we" in the quote below.

And who knows? Why don't you try it?

2 + 2 = 4? What logic or reason defies this?

 

[Orias]

2 + 2 = 4? What logic or reason defies this?

Death.

 

[Where Is God]

I would argue that what I'm doing is a label, not necessarily relevant or even directly specific to what I am doing, since I am also watching UFC Fight Night Live.

The label of what you are doing is not relative to what you are doing? What? I have the balls to admit I have no idea what you are talking about. I have never been exposed to this type of thinking. But I can't exactly prove that??

 

[Where Is God]

Death.

*When* does the end of life become relevant to the addition of numbers?

 

[Orias]

The label of what you are doing is not relative to what you are doing? What? I have the balls to admit I have no idea what you are talking about. I have never been exposed to this type of thinking. But I can't exactly prove that??

Perhaps I should of worded it better.

Let's try this, labels are meanings we attach to what is. Everyone gives every label a different meaning (though mass perspective is well recognized). When we die, meaning is irrelevant to non-existence.

 

[Orias]

*When* does the end of life become relevant to the addition of numbers?

What "perpetuates" the "addition of numbers"?

What makes arithmatic any less human fabricated than a sky daddy?