• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What evidence for God

Orias

Left Hand Path
Yelling "surprise" does.

Lol.

I am very practical with numbers, they help me do a many number of things.

I just wouldn't use it by means of argument, I find that a naturalistic flow allows me to just express, instead of sit there and contradict myself while trying to fathom the depths of my own mind.

We all posses a Universe of our own.
 

Wombat

Active Member
You have no proof (and no one does) of the Christian God.

While the above is true and correct...that is not to say there is no 'evidence' for God.;)

While Atheists (seemingly invariably) object- there is no “objective empirical scientific evidence” for God...that is not to conclude there is no rational, logical reasonable evidence for God or that aberations in statistical probability cannot and do not constitute evidence for God.
 

Where Is God

Creator
Ok well tell me what you think about this. Mathematicians say that any number divided by zero is undefined. I say it is infinite. I see division as this. The number you divide is the amount of cookies I have in a jar. The number you divided by is the amount of cookies each person gets. Can't I have an infinite amount of people come and take zero cookies?
 

Where Is God

Creator
While the above is true and correct...that is not to say there is no 'evidence' for God.;)

While Atheists (seemingly invariably) object- there is no “objective empirical scientific evidence” for God...that is not to conclude there is no rational, logical reasonable evidence for God or that aberations in statistical probability cannot and do not constitute evidence for God.

You have not read all of my posts. I also said it was impossible to disprove god. Please do not impose without reading in depth please.
 

Orias

Left Hand Path
Ok well tell me what you think about this. Mathematicians say that any number divided by zero is undefined. I say it is infinite. I see division as this. The number you divide is the amount of cookies I have in a jar. The number you divided by is the amount of cookies each person gets. Can't I have an infinite amount of people come and take zero cookies?

No, because an infinite amount of people doesn't exist.
 

Where Is God

Creator
While the above is true and correct...that is not to say there is no 'evidence' for God.;)

While Atheists (seemingly invariably) object- there is no “objective empirical scientific evidence” for God...that is not to conclude there is no rational, logical reasonable evidence for God or that aberations in statistical probability cannot and do not constitute evidence for God.

I felt you imposing God-ish
 

Orias

Left Hand Path
I never said the same person couldn't reach into the jar an infinite amount of times. In it's simplest context (without death or finite amount of humans) it works

No, because you said infinite amount of people, not the same person reaching into the jar an infinite amount of times. Even then, it's not possible. Infinity is unbound by spacetime and quantity.
 

Where Is God

Creator
No, because you said infinite amount of people, not the same person reaching into the jar an infinite amount of times. Even then, it's not possible. Infinity is unbound by spacetime and quantity.

Forget my wording, is it possible for the jar to be reached into and the person(s) reaching in never takes a cookie?
 

Wombat

Active Member
I felt you imposing God-ish

Did you now?...and you "felt" this so strongly from the passage quoted you felt obliged to blow it up bold?-

".. that is not to conclude there is no rational, logical reasonable evidence for God or that aberations in statistical probability cannot and do not constitute evidence for God..."

Any time your ready to explain how my statement makes you "feel" God is being "imposed" on you (and/or) anything you have said be sure to let me know.

As it is I have no idea what would make you FEEL that way all so bold and puffed up and underlined.:shrug:
 

Where Is God

Creator
Did you now?...and you "felt" this so strongly from the passage quoted you felt obliged to blow it up bold?-

".. that is not to conclude there is no rational, logical reasonable evidence for God or that aberations in statistical probability cannot and do not constitute evidence for God..."

Any time your ready to explain how my statement makes you "feel" God is being "imposed" on you (and/or) anything you have said be sure to let me know.

As it is I have no idea what would make you FEEL that way all so bold and puffed up and underlined.:shrug:
I'm on my iPod and am unfamiliar with how editing works on this forum. I meant to do just one... But I thought it wasn't working so I tried bold.

I didn't mean imposing god on me. I meant I felt the implied belief in god
 

Wombat

Active Member
I'm on my iPod

Yea?....Ya smoking or injecting it? :D


I didn't mean imposing god on me. I meant I felt the implied belief in god

You "felt the implied belief in god" but didn't feel/mean I was "imposing god" on you...?

Who then?

Am I "imposing" an "implied belief in god" on myself? If so...I'm fine with that and
will thoroughly admonish myself if my impositions upon myself become a problem for me.:yes:


Untill then I remain confused and uncertain as to what imposition was supposed to have transpired:confused:

"Calm down"

Who are you talking to now? And what about?
 
Last edited:

Where Is God

Creator
For that bit on the iPod, I have no idea what you are talking about.

Secondly I dont remember or care what we were arguing over.
I was talking to you. Calm down. <3
 

Wombat

Active Member
For that bit on the iPod, I have no idea what you are talking about.

Secondly I dont remember or care what we were arguing over.
I was talking to you. Calm down. <3

1/Nevermind.

2/ I wasn't "arguing" I was asking you what you were upset about, "feeling" "imposed" upon....but now you "dont remember or care" what it was :slap:

3/ Ok, I'll "calm down"...I'll stop accusing you of "imposing" on me, I'll stop "feeling" imposed upon without being able to articulate how or why, I'll stop blowing text to the max in bold underline....

Mate......If I was upset or other than calm I'd let you know your 'God' can't sing.;)
 
Top