guilo
Undercover Nudist
I still say chocolate is pretty good evidence of God.
"Good God, how much reverence can you have for a Supreme Being who finds it necessary to include such phenomena as phlegm and tooth decay in His divine system of Creation? What in the world was running through that warped, evil, scatological mind of His when He robbed old people of the power to control their bowel movements? Why in the world did He ever create pain?" - Yossarian in Catch-22, written by Joseph Heller.
I overheard a great conversation the other day about a hard-hitting Bible-belting Christian the other day in which he related that in an attempt to revamp his parents' PC, he backed up all the documents and photos on an external hard drive, formatted the computer, and when he tried to copy the backups back to the PC afterwards, the hard drive was mysteriously broken and all data was virtually irretrievable. How is this not noticed by Christians as something you might as well call the anti-miracle? If something of similar coincidental proportions happened to this guy's advantage instead of his detriment, he would have lauded this as the biggest miracle ever! To be a believer in miracles, this guy has to be insanely selective as to what he determines his views from.
Any feelings or views of karma, divine intervention and unnatural world order is based on exactly the same principle. Using all available data, and by not being selective, we can see how random things actually are and the only concept of a God that makes sense is that of one sitting in front of a slot-machine pressing a button and seeing what happens. In other words, he is completely unnecessary, since you might as well think that the slot-machine can run by itself, with no different outcome.