Why wouldn't a stone exist just because I couldn't imagine or could imagine something?
I do not know. I asked you. You have to prove that a stone will exist in absence of consciousness.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why wouldn't a stone exist just because I couldn't imagine or could imagine something?
They take you to a funeral home.Q: What happens when you die...
Oh. I would have to prove that if every living thing became unconscious a stone wouldn't disappear? How about just using logic, reason and common sense? If every life on the planet got unconscious the planet or maybe the rest of the universe would poof out of existence?I do not know. I asked you. You have to prove that a stone will exist in absence of consciousness.
I do not know. I asked you. You have to prove that a stone will exist in absence of consciousness.
Depends on the sensory organs of the being experiencing it and any number of other factors. To an American it might be a stone to me being Norwegian it's a "stein". What exists is the material object how we experience it doesn't change the object one bit.
You think there's no difference between the properties of a subatomic particle and a stone?
You think there's no difference between the properties of a subatomic particle and a stone?
I do not know. I asked you. You have to prove that a stone will exist in absence of consciousness.
Oh. I would have to prove that if every living thing became unconscious a stone wouldn't disappear? --
The (human) map is not the territory. Beyond that, the (human) map only describes the human version/experience of the territory. Just thought I'd throw that second part in. Not sure if it's relevent to the discussion.
According to some who believe so, you can make whatever you wish be.
When you are cold, all you have to do is think of being warm or something of the sort and you will be warm.
In some cases you can even bend matter to your will.
Bending spoons, and even walking through walls.
Sounds a tad bit insane, don't you think?
There is a show, and yes I know its completely fictional aside from the attempt of adding "real science" into it, Stargate: SG1 and Stargate: Atlantis.
The show takes real theories into consideration making an elaborate show with an amazing story line.
Atlantis is real, it really did sink. Merlin was an "Ancient", who belonged to a superbly advanced civilization.
Their final goal was to reach ascension. This is where your mysticism comes into play.
The thought that we could evolve past our mortal bodies and become pure energy.
Its a fun thought and makes a great show, but there is no reason to believe any of this has any merit in the real world.
A stone is a stone whatever you call it. You just put a different name on the same object.Prior to the time the word-symbol 'stone' existed, what is that to which we are referring?
Sorry you aren't making any sense. I call Mount Rushmore Mount Rushmore and it doesn't matter if every conscious being in the universe dropped dead and there was no consciousness left in the universe Mount Rushmore would still be there until weather eroded it down.You call it a 'material object', but that also is a set of word-symbols conceptually created by the mind to refer to that which is in question.
When I ask: 'What is it?', I am asking about its intrinsic nature, not what we mentally conceive it to be as a static object.
You call it a 'stone' as if it is a static object, but in reality, it is in flux, although ever so slowly. It is an energy-form in flux, just as an ocean wave is an energy-form in flux, but when we look at an ocean wave, there is no such entity that can be pinned down as such. So where is this object you call a 'stone'? Where is the thing we call 'river' that flows?
Why must we assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind? Let us call the first sentence A and the second sentence E. Can you fill in B, C and D and explain the logical reasoning?All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter.
― Max Planck
A stone is a stone whatever you call it. You just put a different name on the same object.
Allow me to answer with a question if I may. If I have a stone in my front yard and the stone has been every day for as long as I have lived here, does that stone still exist if I'm rendered legally brain dead tomorrow and my conscience awareness ceases to exist? The answer is yes. The stone exist regardless of my abstract awareness of it's reality. The stone remains in existence independent of my comprehension or acknowledgement of it.
A stone is a stone whatever you call it. You just put a different name on the same object.Sorry you aren't making any sense. I call Mount Rushmore Mount Rushmore and it doesn't matter if every conscious being in the universe dropped dead and there was no consciousness left in the universe Mount Rushmore would still be there until weather eroded it down.
Claim this when you are no more conscious. (Or at least claim it while you are deep asleep. Or claim it in your dream).