Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
But I'm not referring to the bulk of their theology. I'm simply pointing out that if Catholic with Capital C refers back to the Catholic Church (as in the Pope's church), that they are not Catholic.They're not a part of the Catholic Church (according to the Catholic Church, which is also problematic as the SVs won't see its modern judgements as binding), but this doesn't negate that theologically they are Roman Catholics.
It's the same with the Russian Orthodox Church; they were excommunicated years ago but they're still theologically Orthodox Christians and are regarded as such, they're just not part of the Orthodox Church.
It really can't, as the Orthodox are clearly not Protestants.Though the CoE does reject the authority of the Pope, so if that is what defines Protestantism, then yes.
Well, anyone who denies the Pope is in schism with the Roman Catholic church I believe. But oh well, call them whatever anyone prefers I guess. Doesn't matter to me - I will continue to call them what I prefer to call them.Sedevacantists.
Who the hell wants to type that
No, I feel this is meaningful.But I'm not referring to the bulk of their theology. I'm simply pointing out that if Catholic with Capital C refers back to the Catholic Church (as in the Pope's church), that they are not Catholic.
Since I'm now repeating myself, I feel like it's time to move on. If you still disagree, that's okay.
It really can't, as the Orthodox are clearly not Protestants.
There are other reasons for a schism.It really can't, as the Orthodox are clearly not Protestants.
Thank you for the source. It was a good one, and worth chewing on.The Via Media—Between What and What? | The North American Anglican
It's not settled what this is either, I know this one:
The first group of Anglicans (let’s call them “Calvinist Anglicans”) says that the via media runs between Wittenberg and Geneva but finally ends in Geneva.
The notion that the Anglican via media travels between Roman Catholicism and Protestantism has been “often debunked” by historians such as Anthony Milton in the first volume of the 4-volume Oxford History of Anglicanism. It was only John Henry Newman and his disciples who have imagined that the Anglican way in its basic outlook is neither Roman nor Protestant.
Indeed, which is where I'm coming from above. It's a difficult issue and is not yet resolved. It's very interesting though.Thank you for the source. It was a good one, and worth chewing on.
At this point, I just don't see how this does justice to Anglo-Catholics. I mean, these people do things like venerate Mary and believe in Purgatory. They emphasize apostolic succession and believe in the seven sacraments. On and on. You have to be a scholar to know the difference between their Holy Communion and a Catholic Mass. Wiki says of Anglo-Catholicism:
"The principal objective of the Oxford Movement was the defence of the Church of England as a divinely founded institution, of the doctrine of apostolic succession and of the Book of Common Prayer as a "rule of faith". The key idea was that Anglicanism was not a Protestant denomination but a branch of the historic Catholic Church, along with the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox churches."
I will have to think on this further.
Thank you for the source. It was a good one, and worth chewing on.
At this point, I just don't see how this does justice to Anglo-Catholics. I mean, these people do things like venerate Mary and believe in Purgatory. They emphasize apostolic succession and believe in the seven sacraments. On and on. You have to be a scholar to know the difference between their Holy Communion and a Catholic Mass. Wiki says of Anglo-Catholicism:
"The principal objective of the Oxford Movement was the defence of the Church of England as a divinely founded institution, of the doctrine of apostolic succession and of the Book of Common Prayer as a "rule of faith". The key idea was that Anglicanism was not a Protestant denomination but a branch of the historic Catholic Church, along with the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox churches."
I will have to think on this further.
The number by which they measure their membership is flawed and greatly inflatedAbout 47 percent of people in the UK are members of the Anglican Church.
But Lutheranism has evolved. The Lutherans are one of the most progressive churches in Christianity. Women pastors, gay pastors, gay marriage (for some) are no problem.Personally, I see Lutheranism as the archaeopteryx of Protestantism: a stepping stone on the way to what we think of as "modern" birds/Protestantism, just with a few holdover features (teeth/not-quite-transubstantiation).
They could do what monarchs have done all the time to establish unions: give the children into marriage.and it would be awkward to attempt to establish formal precedence between the Monarchy of the Vatican and the Monarchy of the United Kingdom.
No, he really didn't. He had nothing to do with Luther or Calvin or Zwingli or any of the other reformers. The Church of England that he set up was Catholic in every way except one: the King was head of the Church rather than the pope.Henry VIII aligned himself with Protestants
A few years back, there were talks about reuniting the AC with the RCC, and they seemed to be serious about it. Has anyone any updates on that?Thank you for the source. It was a good one, and worth chewing on.
At this point, I just don't see how this does justice to Anglo-Catholics. I mean, these people do things like venerate Mary and believe in Purgatory. They emphasize apostolic succession and believe in the seven sacraments. On and on. You have to be a scholar to know the difference between their Holy Communion and a Catholic Mass. Wiki says of Anglo-Catholicism:
"The principal objective of the Oxford Movement was the defence of the Church of England as a divinely founded institution, of the doctrine of apostolic succession and of the Book of Common Prayer as a "rule of faith". The key idea was that Anglicanism was not a Protestant denomination but a branch of the historic Catholic Church, along with the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox churches."
I will have to think on this further.
The first part is not true,Henry VIII aligned himself with Protestants, and Queen Elizabeth 1 did as well. Many practicing Roman Catholics were put to death during their reigns, for being Roman Catholic. James 1 and Charles 1 continued the path toward more and more Protestantism.
The Anglican Church (C of E) agrees in many instances with the Lutheran and other Protestant churches, though it is pretty light on the details compared to the Lutheran and Catholic churches. James 1 instigated the King James Version of the bible, for goodness sake!
The C of E ordains women as priests and bishops, unlike the Roman Catholic church. It ordains transgender people as well, and non binary people. Since the Gender Recognition Act 2004, trans people legally confirmed in their gender identity under its provisions are able to marry someone of the opposite sex in their parish church.
About 47 percent of people in the UK are members of the Anglican Church.
Church of England - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Strongly doubt this will happen, nor do I want it to. I can't think of any Anglicans who do.A few years back, there were talks about reuniting the AC with the RCC, and they seemed to be serious about it. Has anyone any updates on that?
Mmm ..but there are plenty who would like to be back in the EU, though..Strongly doubt this will happen, nor do I want it to. I can't think of any Anglicans who do.
It is in a way..The first part is not true..
Or Catholics either, for that matter,Strongly doubt this will happen, nor do I want it to. I can't think of any Anglicans who do.