What if it was created by God to evolve?

[Subduction Zone]

If we evolved... God created or from a pond... there is no need for Jesus or salvation.

If death did not come through the first Adam then life does not come from the Second Adam.

So evolution by definition is not compatible with Christianity.

Most Christians seem to disagree with you.

 

[dwb001]

Most Christians seem to disagree with you.

That is fine with me.
They can be wrong all they want.
Argue the point though.

 

[Audie]

If we evolved... God created or from a pond... there is no need for Jesus or salvation.

If death did not come through the first Adam then life does not come from the Second Adam.

So evolution by definition is not compatible with Christianity.

" with your chosen version of "

 

[dwb001]

" with your chosen version of "

Please use complete sentences.

 

[Subduction Zone]

That is fine with me.
They can be wrong all they want.
Argue the point though.

No, I will not argue doctrine for others. I can argue from a scientific view that shows how we know that you are wrong.

 

[Audie]

Please use complete sentences.

It's grammatically correct as written.

 

[dwb001]

No, I will not argue doctrine for others. I can argue from a scientific view that shows how we know that you are wrong.

I have not made any scientific points.
Argue away... strawmen are easy to argue against.

 

[dwb001]

It's grammatically correct as written.

No it isn't. Or I would have responded with an answer instead of a correction.

 

[Audie]

No it isn't. Or I would have responded with an answer instead of a correction.

You are simply playing grammar Nazi-
though you lack the skill and training to
be any good at it- to avoid dealing with the fact
that you stated a blatant falsehood about Christianity and
science.

 

[dwb001]

You are simply playing grammar Nazi-
though you lack the skill and training to
be any good at it- to avoid dealing with the fact
that you stated a blatant falsehood about Christianity and
science.

What falsehood?
And a sentence fragment is not grammatically correct.

 

[exchemist]

That is fine with me.
They can be wrong all they want.
Argue the point though.

Why bother? Arguing with aggressive ignoramuses is a poor way to spend one's time.

 

[dwb001]

Why bother? Arguing with aggressive ignoramuses is a poor way to spend one's time.

Have I been aggressive? What did I say that was aggressive?

Sounds like a baseless claim.

So you are not interested in debate... then why comment?

 

[Audie]

Why bother? Arguing with aggressive ignoramuses is a poor way to spend one's time.

How true. I just now quit.

 

[dwb001]

How true. I just now quit.

Quitters never win and winners never quit.

 

[exchemist]

Have I been aggressive? What did I say that was aggressive?

Sounds like a baseless claim.

So you are not interested in debate... then why comment?

Of course you have. You give every appearance of looking for a fight.

 

[dwb001]

Of course you have. You give every appearance of looking for a fight.

What have I said that indicates I want a fight? Making assumptions makes an *** out of you and umption.

So why not just stick to facts instead of opinion?

 

[exchemist]

What have I said that indicates I want a fight? Making assumptions makes an *** out of you and umption.

So why not just stick to facts instead of opinion?

Here are some facts, viz. the posts you have made since your arrival today:

dwb001

 

[dwb001]

Here are some facts, viz. the posts you have made since your arrival today:

dwb001

And none of those posts show any signs of aggressive behavior. So backup your claims or back off.

 

[exchemist]

And none of those posts show any signs of aggressive behavior. So backup your claims or back off.

On the contrary, the majority of them are peremptory and rude.

 

[dwb001]

On the contrary, the majority of them are peremptory and rude.

I disagree. Maybe ask a question before assuming motive.

Show me an example of me being aggressive or even rude. You keep making claims without providing any backup.