Zorro1227
Active Member
Your understanding of "anti-christ" is about on level with a child's understanding of calculus. :sleep:
And you know this how?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Your understanding of "anti-christ" is about on level with a child's understanding of calculus. :sleep:
A vague statment, not directed at any person, appearently, and completly devoid of any merrit. This must be the pathetic shrugging off zorro was talking about.Your understanding of "anti-christ" is about on level with a child's understanding of calculus. :sleep:
Is there anything wrong with being silly?Then why the h*** would you even comment on this?
Discussing a subject matter that you are vaguely familiar with and devoid of any real understanding warrants no merrit.A vague statment, not directed at any person, appearently, and completly devoid of any merrit.
Sweet blasphemy cracks me up everytime. I must agree this topic is funny. I really like it.:biglaugh:
Rather than just spouting stuff, back up these claims in someway.There is no "what if" about it. Jesus can easily be called an anti-christ. He failed to fulfill the messianic prophicies, so he was not a messiah (christ and messiah are interchangable, christ being a grecko roman translation of messiah). Right of the bat, we know he's a false christ. When you factor in the fact that Dt. tells us that any one claiming to be a prophet that speaks against torah is surely a false prophit as jesus did, it reinforces the false christ conclusion. Then when you consider that jesus was in fact the opposite (or anti version) of what the messiah was sopposed to be, it's perfectly reasonable to call jesus an anti-christ. For example the messiah is to usher in a 1000 years of peace on earth, but jesus promised he did not come to bring peace but a sword. He never braught any peice in his lifetime, and his followers are in fact, the most blood soaked religion ever practiced, quite the opposite of what the messiah's to be. Jesus was an anti-christ.
Discussing a subject matter that you are vaguely familiar with and devoid of any real understanding warrants no merrit.
Is there anything wrong with being silly?
This is ridiculous go thump your bible over someone else's head.
Sweet blasphemy cracks me up everytime. I must agree this topic is funny. I really like it.
You bruise easily...So now you are saying that I am vaguely familiar with the subject? This is ridiculous go thump your bible over someone else's head.
You bruise easily...
No just make a valid point if you are going to post something.
Zorro, in order to twist the anti-christ thing around properly you have to first understand the concept from the bible.
In order to do that you have to first understand that what preachers and churches teach does not equal in many cases what the bible actually says.
Parlor games are indeed fun, but your thread was more than a parlor game. However, if you just want people that agree with your gullable assumptions about the anti-christ than have at it.
For your information Itwillend I do know a thing or two about the antichrist. If say satan is technically "the christ" then Jesus would be considered the antichrist. Get it?