McBell
Unbound
Actually, what you did there was play loose and free with the definition of the word doctrine to support your argument when the definition of the word doctrine that was being presented to you is ALSO a definition of the word doctrine.Definition of WHAT word?
Your obfuscation will get you nowhere, because I am only going to keep repeating what I said before..
I am not advocating or promoting a belief or course of action.
Dishonesty? It would be dishonest if I said I was advocating or promoting a belief or course of action when I am not doing so.
I only share what I believe within the context of a discussion. That is what people do on a religious forum.
Share: give a portion of (something) to another or others. https://www.google.com
Certain people on this thread are continually speaking for other people and their motives on this forum.
That is beyond arrogant, and the fact that these people cannot even recognize their arrogance makes it all the worse.
That is dishonest.
The rest of your back peddling holds no interest to me.