metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
Again, you're operating out of ignorance about the concept, therefore all you are doing is barking up the wrong tree entirely. It's one thing to question or disagree with the concept as that's quite "kosher", but it is really just an exercise in ignorance not even to try and understand the concept.What concept? Isn't God from everlasting as Psalms 90:2 says______
Meaning concept is: that God had No beginning because God is from everlasting. ( from before anything else)
Whereas, per-human heavenly Jesus whom God sent to Earth for us was Not from everlasting.
Pre-human heavenly Jesus was "IN" the beginning, but No where does is say Jesus was 'before' the beginning.
Even the resurrected Jesus, before he ascended to heaven, at John 20:17 thought he had a God over him.
Now please notice that the then resurrected ascended-to-heaven Jesus still thinks he has a God over him according to John at Revelation 3:12.
Also, there is more than one throne mentioned at Revelation 3:21.
Why would one person with three heads need more than one throne _______
The early Church fathers wrote the NT in Koine Greek, thus using a language and some concepts that were quite familiar with them, and one very important concept was their use of "essence" as formulated by Aristotle and Plato even though the word itself doesn't show up in any of the Christian scriptures per se. Here: Essence - Wikipedia
Simply put, "essence" in this case relates to what is important about Jesus and the Holy Spirit via God. It doesn't posit that they are literally God the Father but that the "essence" of them is of the Father. It's like the "essence" of a car is more than just a sum of its parts.
I'm outta here for the rest of the weekend, so take care.