This one: what is the significance thereof?- We have a constitutional right to them.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
This one: what is the significance thereof?- We have a constitutional right to them.
What bad guys?
What you seem to not understand or do not want to understand is that the US has heavily legislated laws against unlawful gun ownership, just not enforced unlawful gun ownership. Maybe if they enforced and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law it might be an effective deterrent to firearms related incidents. Look ****** (insert your word there) I am not ignoring the problem, all I am doing is ignoring the idiots call for more regulations that will not be enforced and will make little or no difference to the past and probably future acts of terrorism or mentally deficient persons obtaining a firearm that they are not legally allowed to purchase.A carbon sign doesn't have any enforcement-like powers, no. Heavily legislating against unlawful gun ownership and gun related violence has proven to be an effective deterrent and instrument to prevent tragedies of the same nature you referred to; as shown in the case you seem to be wilfully ignoring.
I always liked the classic Walthers.I like guns. I mean, I also support legislation but that doesn't mean I don't like them.
For instance, this is without question the most gorgeous firearm ever constructed by human hands.
And of Lugers, the single greatest one ever made is this one;
I would kill all of you to have this one.
Look ****** (insert your word there) I am not ignoring the problem,
This isn't always an option.
But I can retrieve mine from the safe in seconds.
Dang it...you took the words right out of my mouth: "They feel like liberty". I guess you have to understand what real freedom means, and costs, to get it.
And you think that criminals would comply with a ban? It's not like guns would instantaneously dematerialize if a ban were enacted.
Sensible hunting practices are much better for the environment than the global meat market.
Not that I don't support people having guns, or whatever, but I never really got this argument at all.
There is no ban or law that criminals would comply with..., but when has that ever been the sole validation for why one wouldn't should ban something?
We have enough problems dealing with our own brand of anti-firearm fanatics...
Yes, it's a gun free zone and there are those in our government that think that "gun free" zones protects you from the "bad people".....pretty dumb don't you think.
And you think that criminals would comply with a ban? It's not like guns would instantaneously dematerialize if a ban were enacted.
You mean to say we shouldn't have any rights. Will big bro take good care of us?[/QUOTE]You can't think of any time you would need to defend yourself?
Do you count hunting for food as sport? Hunting for food is more humane than buying burgers.
2) What rights? You don't have any.
Hunters also have the habit (for the most part) of eating everything they hunt. I think hunting things yourself leads to a certain sense of moral and pragmatic responsibility which is not replicated in a market environment. This doesn't apply to yahoo sport hunters, but they aren't most hunters I've ever known.Not if the supply of meat was the same... I mean, maybe in the sense that the overwhelming majority of population can't really engage in hunting...
It's significant because.....This one: what is the significance thereof?
Never said you were.
I said you've completely overlooked the example I gave several times in this thread.
Keep name calling though; I'm sure you'll go far.
That is the reason I got sharp with you. I am not ignoring the problem, you are just seeing the problem in a different light than me.prevent tragedies of the same nature you referred to; as shown in the case you seem to be wilfully ignoring.
At the same point that some call us that are against imposing additional firearm laws.Who is a "fanatic" to you, esmith? Anyone who wants any of the few existing regulations? More regulations? At what point do you call someone a "fanatic"?
Wish you would check the data before you make a statement. If one has a mental health issue and it is recorded in the data base used for background checks that person can not purchase a firearm.If a bad guy wants to shoot you, he wll
Lol no. But then they wouldn't comply with any kind of ban. Besides, most of these mass shootings and whatever aren't caused by 'bad guys', they're caused by mentally ill people who wouldn't otherwise have access to dangerous firearms if there was a ban.