Depends on his reason for doing that and what he finds down there, no?
Is this faith?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Depends on his reason for doing that and what he finds down there, no?
Is this faith?
He's auditioning for the part of a bicycle rack in a play.Depends on his reason for doing that and what he finds down there, no?
Unless, of course, it's hope for something ordinarily beyond reach .... like the future.expectation is equivocal to hope, not faith
But it has been explained and thus it's not faith.
It remained the same, did it not? So it is still faith.
Unless, of course, it's hope for something ordinarily beyond reach .... like the future.
Faith in this context is trusting that tomorrow will fulfill our hopeful expectations, whether those be that tomorrow is better than today, or even just that tomorrow will arrive.you mean faith bridges the gap between the here and now to the future because the future is unseen...?
hmmm.
but we hope for a future...we just take it for granted that the future will come because of faith.
faith is like waiting for tomorrow...
Faith in this context is trusting that tomorrow will fulfill our hopeful expectations, whether those be that tomorrow is better than today, or even just that tomorrow will arrive.
Right.hope is the desire that tomorrow will fulfill our expectations and that tomorrow may hopefully arrive.
How so?otherwise the confidence placed in this trust becomes presumptuous
It can. Trust is a predisposition. When I trust that you'll understand, I'm predisposed to the belief that you will.so does having faith mean to be predisposed to assumption?
Is this faith?
because it's the degree of emphasis or level of confidence placed in trust doesn't make it trust anymore, it makes it a presumptionHow so?
It can. Trust is a predisposition. When I trust that you'll understand, I'm predisposed to the belief that you will.
To what do you attribute this statement of faith?
Compassion is the same, whether you justify it or not. You can justify it, but it doesn't change anything. Reason is after the fact, not before. Compassion needs no justification. It just is. Explaining it is unnecessary.
That's why it's faith.
We humans being social animals have innate empathy and compassion. Caring for one another is an essential part of our emotional and psychological health and also a survival trait. Doing what's in our nature has nothing to do with faith. There is nothing mysterious or magical about it.
Some seem to think that reason should take a backseat to faith. While others seem to believe not only is faith unnecessary but it is detrimental.
So which do you think is more important to humanity and why?
who says faith has to be without reason?:areyoucra
who says faith has to be without reason?:areyoucra
who says faith has to be without reason?:areyoucra