Dont turn this thread your personal jihad against Israel, please.Did Israel created by peace or by war ?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Dont turn this thread your personal jihad against Israel, please.Did Israel created by peace or by war ?
Honestly, I don't care what is written in the Bible. We Christian don't take the Bible literally.
And by the way, I will always defend the freedom of speech and religion. Because in Christian countries anyone can criticize Christianity and even say that the Bible is full of idiocies. That's the beauty of the freedom of thought,
And I will always defend educated and bright people like Nonie Darwish and Ayaan Hirsi Ali...who maybe love the Muslim people more than lots of Muslims.
And I will fight until death to spread the freedom of thought in all the Mediterranean area. I want the Mediterranean area to gain back the splendor of its golden age, where any person had the freedom of religion. I want to promote cultural dialogue and criticism, which are the basis of intellectual progress and economic development
Dont turn this thread your personal jihad against Israel, please.
Dialogue is welcome, but spreading hatred and calling for the destruction of islam(which ayaan is doing) is counterproductive.
she never did. She just fights for the women's rights.
Unless you want to affirm that gender inequality and considering women inferior is the essence of Islam
Hey, you think we want your rejects?
she never did. She just fights for the women's rights.
Unless you want to affirm that gender inequality and considering women inferior is the essence of Islam
@Servant_of_the_One
No one should ever kill another in the name of religion, even if they are speaking against it. What purpose does that serve, other than proving such religion is compulsive and barbaric?
Applying 650AD Muslim death penalty for blasphemy today, makes no more sense than applying 1500BC laws from the Torah. Israel exists today as a Jewish/Palestinian state without enforcing the more outrageous directions of their early scripture, Europe exist today without treating heretics with death and torture, the way they were treated in the middle ages. America no longer drowns witches.
Islam is a newer religion, and perhaps many Muslims are not ready to give up the strictest Koranic laws overnight, my opinion is Mohammed would not enforce all those laws if he lived today, and conservative Muslims need to seriously lighten up on calling for strict sharia law, same as with strict Mosaic law, or strict Pauline law.
And Islam has the strictest laws against killing other Muslims; How does the Muslim terrorist that kills a bunch of Muslims think he is going to heaven, when the Koran clearly states he will go straight to hell for it.
Blasphemers that refuse to stop spreading lies about Allah subhana alla, can be imprisoned and deported to Western countries, where mocking God and belittling his prophets is accepted and allowed.
Well I'm not a practicing Muslim, but I respect Islamic religion and the Prophet(pbuh) greatly. But just off the top of my head I would think we have jails now, so we don't really need to punish thieves with amputations, we can put them in prison, and let them go when they repent.
We also have mental hospitals, many "apostates" are mentally ill or delusional and can be treated with modern medicines in hospitals. Instead of death, Blasphemers that refuse to stop spreading lies about Allah subhana alla, can be imprisoned and deported to Western countries, where mocking God and belittling his prophets is accepted and allowed.
Female circumcision(which is not in the holy Koran) would be a good one to give up in African countries.
Adultery is another offense that can easily be punished by Jail for a term instead of death, although personally I find that even too harsh, I would recommend a tatoo on the hand clearly stating "adulterer", then no devout Muslim would wish to marry them.
This is the 21st century, in most of the rest of the world women have rights almost equal to men, In Islam for one thousand years women had more rights, than women had in Christian or Jewish countries, The prophet Mohammed(pbuh) was WAY ahead of his times in extending more rights to women than anyone before him. Don't you think if he were living today he might give even more rights to Muslim women, like the right to an Islamic court decide custody of the children after divorce, for EITHER the man or the women.
And last but not least in the Prophets time women often got married as young as 10 years old, same in Europe, Same in America, but today we know much more than we did then, we know that children do not think like adults, they are not ready to commit to marriage, they don't even know what they are going to do when they grow up, So here in America we say you have to be 18 before you can get married. The law used to be 16. some people probably think it should be 21!!! In any case its an issue that needs to be discussed by Imam's and Islamic scholars, is it time to take a stand and say, "marrying under 18 is old fashioned, and what is religious about marrying very young girls, do the girls have a choice, do they truly want to get married??".
Allah is beneficent, merciful does he want our Upstanding men marrying children or adult women. Ask any of your scholars, Would Allah want us more to marry a child or a grown woman; do you think Allah would prefer we marry a grown woman, if so, maybe we should make it a law, that a child must be a grown adult before she lives with a husband. I hope and pray I am not giving bad advice. Sincerely Lyndon