• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What is wrong with believing in evolution?

interminable

interminable

منتظر
Ouroboros said:
Get information? They don't get information. The potential of polypeptide chains are huge. It's part of nature. Just like everything else.


True. I don't believe everything is physical. But we do know that DNA is.
Click to expand...
I'll consider that a car can be part of nature too [emoji16] [emoji16] [emoji16]

Clay isn't intelligent. A designer should create them. U took a look at a car and say wow! Who is the designer?

But u look and your body that its complexity is billion billion time more than a car but still u say it's nature.

I can't continue
 
interminable

interminable

منتظر
Kirran said:
I just pointed out the large numbers of Muslims, including the majorities in many countries, who would disagree with you.
Click to expand...
And I wanna say that u should consider those who are expert in religion not Muslims. U can see clearly that wahabi interpret the quran as they wish but they wish.
 
Kirran

Kirran

ॐ
Premium Member
interminable said:
And I wanna say that u should consider those who are expert in religion not Muslims. U can see clearly that wahabi interpret the quran as they wish but they wish.
Click to expand...

From my perspective, Islam is that which is believed by Muslims. I don't see how there can be a 'true Islam' divorced from its lived experience.
 
interminable

interminable

منتظر
Ouroboros said:
It was full of exaggerations and pure lies. They even intentionally cut-and-pasted parts of interviews to make scientists seem to say something they didn't.

I watched actual fossil bones in lab. That's much more worth it.
Click to expand...
They tell lie about complexity of a cell and DNA???
 
interminable

interminable

منتظر
sovietchild said:
@interminable Why humans shares 99% of genes with chimps? Humans share 99% of genes with chimps? Can DNA explain differences? | Genetic Literacy Project

Clay may have been birthplace of life on Earth, new study suggests- https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/11/131105132027.htm
Click to expand...
Our scientists rejected this theory with lots of arguments and new discoveries
But all are in Persian and I can't translate unfortunately. But I send link

فرضیه ی تکامل؛ منطقه ی ممنوعه!!! - 5 (بخش 1)
 
JakofHearts

JakofHearts

2 Tim 1.7
9-10ths_Penguin said:
Do you understand that abiogenesis and evolution are two different things?

Arguing against evolution by attacking abiogenesis is like arguing against Ohm's Law by saying that it can't be right unless we know how electrons were formed.

Arguing against evolution by arguing against abiogenesis shows a pretty deep misunderstanding of what the theory of evolution actually says.
Click to expand...
Nah, darwinism is baseless if there is no good theory in abiogenesis which it does not have. I know many atheists try to pretend it doesn't matter, but it really does matter in the grand scheme of things. You don't pigeon hole one theory and try to exclude all the other natural laws that bring it into question.

Anyway, my post was out of curiosity towards Psychoslice's odd position he believes in.

All evolution needs is for its raw material - life - to exist in the first place. Once it does - and you do acknowledge that life exists, right? - the evolutionary mechanisms of natural selection, random mutation, and inheritance can work on it.
Click to expand...
This is a bad argument that doesn't hold water. To use an analogy, a house is made up of many raw materials like bricks, wood, nails etc -- but the house doesn't build itself. It requires a blueprint, a plan, builders, labourers, basically people with a specific job to do.

The most simple living organism on the planet according to Dawkins is a cell, and a cell employs a complex information-processing system to access and express the information stored in DNA as they use that information to build the proteins and protein machines that they need to stay alive.
So you have a lot of problems here for your position, one aspect is you have a chicken and a egg problem: life is made up of proteins, but you need a ribosome to form specific proteins.

Your argument may have been rational 150 years ago when they thought a cell was as complicated as a ping pong, but with the advancement of biomolecular chemistry this argument is reaching.

I believe that one day the Darwinian myth will be ranked the greatest deceit in the history of science.
 
interminable

interminable

منتظر
Ouroboros said:
Who's?

A cell and DNA is complex, yes. But it is natural. Nature is complex.
Click to expand...
But we see a car and can't believe that has no designer so who can we believe that a cell that is zillion times more completed has no designer????
Is that what u want to say???

Please tell me
When before cell was created who knew that there are something visible or audible???
The same about smell and taste and touch????

This a philosophical law

U can't ask someone to give u something that he doesn't have.

When a mud hadn't have intelligence how it can be intelligent????

This must be borrowed from something else
 
sovietchild

sovietchild

Well-Known Member
interminable said:
Not at all

Can u tell me how sex was appeared??

How Womb and breast of women were created?
Click to expand...

I thought alligators evolved from sea creatures.

alligator_gar_fish_06.jpg

This fish (alligator gar fish) known for its ability to survive outside the water, being able to last for up to two hours above the surface.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top