I have no idea why you are calling the attempts on MPs life, murder of slaves and the first migration to Abyssinia a straw man. Are you saying these events are not in the Arab fairytale or have you randomly decided to reject it to defend your pals the psychopathic leader of Mecca and his son because it interferes with your pro Islamist agenda
No I am attacking your claim that I think these acts are justified or moral. Just as you are doing right now creating a strawman to smear me. Try again son.
The Arab historians generally tend to cast MP and his companions the Rashidun in your psycho pals image to justify his cruel rule. However, the flaws in these books are obvious and cannot be harmonized with the Quran. They also make a mockery of reality
You mean the same authors which the majority of your information is from? Hilarious.
As far as Abo Bak and Umer are concerned, they repealed laws passed by the other famous psychopath and megalomaniac in this tale, the Christian Emperor, Heraclius- who ordered the murder of all Jews in his empire.
Do you know what repeal means? Neither Bakr nor Umar repelled anything as they were not citizens of Byzantium nor a power within Byzantium. The Caliphate was not the successor to Byzantium nor a part of it.
Umer could have just as easily looked the other way and pretended he didn't know or even grandfathered these laws, but he didn't. He actively stopped the murder. So he was a good man in my opinion. In addition he restored the Jewish exilarchs by permitting them to wear their signet rings and allowed Jews to return to Jerusalem that Heraclius had forbidden. Similarly, Ali settled in the Jewish town of Kuffa, outside of Baghdad. He wouldn't have done that if the Jews were unhappy with him. In addition the exilarchs wouldn't have supported Ali and his son when the psycho son attacked Ali.
Kuffa was not a Jewish town, it was founded by Umar. More so the lands around Kuffa were Jewish according to Islamic history which Umar gave to Arabs then he relocated the Jews.
So, yes, Jizya was imposed by the Rashidun but only on followers of the other psychopath in this tale,
No it was imposed Christians and Jews not only Meccans.
Heraclius when they refused to pay taxes and offered armed resistance.
Heraclius was not a subject of Muslims. So he merely rejected people demanding money from him.
However, no Jizya was imposed on peaceful Jews and Christians such as those in the Axumite Empire under the Muslim Christian ruler Najashi
Najashi was a Christian not a Muslim.
Its probably because you haven't understood how Najashi was a Muslim too.
No you are stating ahistorical myth nothing more. There is no evidence he was Muslim.
LOL
There is a vast difference between exile and a self imposed exile.
Yes there is. So what? He was still in exile
Just as there is a vast difference between running clockwise and and running anti clockwise.
Not really.
We don't say someone ran clockwise when we mean they ran anti clockwise.
This just shows you do not understand the word exile
I believe this was your original statement:
Yes. And? Reading comprehension. Did I say he was exiled by the Meccans? No...
Shad, it seems your agenda and that of the Islamists is one i.e. as I said,
Hardly. Another smear tactic, nothing more
Consequently you cherry pick randomly as they do
And you make up history as you.
Demonstrate said claim of cherry picking. Have at it son.
