Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I actually like that. I'm gonna right that down.Admitting our own ignorance is the first sign of true knowledge.
What is wrong with those people who don't believe in God?
What is wrong with those people who don't believe in God?
I have heard that as well. It is quite off the mark.I think that's because they are afraid to be conscious of something to account for their transgressions of the Law.
I have heard that as well. It is quite off the mark.
My pleasure.What then is to shoot right on the target? Do you have any idea you could share with me?
Aye, I'd forgotten that one.I think that's because they are afraid to be conscious of something to account for their transgressions of the Law.
And yet, it often seems to work surprisingly well.I find the argument that gods were created as a method of control as far fetched as anything said by any theist.
It depends on how God revealed God's self to be honest. yes those are likely to happen though.I have a question for you. If God tomorrow would reveal himself, would atheists actually believe? Would they still believe in him? Will atheists come up with all sorts of theories to explain what happened? Was it a hallucination, or some magic trick played by someone, or some other medical-scientific reasoning behind it?
I could be quite wrong, but I rather think that that was an unexpected bonus. It was probably after they saw people bending to their will that thoughts of unbridled power came to the fore.And yet, it often seems to work surprisingly well.
I have a question for you. If God tomorrow would reveal himself, would atheists actually believe? Would they still believe in him? Will atheists come up with all sorts of theories to explain what happened? Was it a hallucination, or some magic trick played by someone, or some other medical-scientific reasoning behind it?
They should.I have a question for you. If God tomorrow would reveal himself, would atheists actually believe? Would they still believe in him?
@sovietchild
You never addressed my question of what you'd do if god revealed themselves to be something entirely different to what you believe them to be.
Their DNA contains an excess of the rhetoric gene.What is wrong with those people who does not post a straight forward answer and talk about something else altogether?
Brahma is a deity in Buddhist cosomology; he is said to possess immense powers, lifespan, vitality, etc. Though he is vastly superior in many ways compared to beings in realms lower than his, he is however only a limited deity among many, in that he will eventually die (after a number of aeons), and there are limits to his power (which cannot affect realms higher than his).I have a question for you. If God tomorrow would reveal himself, would atheists actually believe? Would they still believe in him? Will atheists come up with all sorts of theories to explain what happened? Was it a hallucination, or some magic trick played by someone, or some other medical-scientific reasoning behind it?
It is indeed difficult to guess what would be considered a revelation, and therefore how specific atheists would react to it.It depends on how God revealed God's self to be honest. yes those are likely to happen though.
Also knowing God exist doesn't mean one would worship or follow god.