Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I do believe that most of the "others" and "indifferent" find that it is natural, but neither good or bad. It is just found to be an orientation like any other. At least, that's what I posted and have seen others mention. So you may look at at least part of the numbers from other and indifferent as having no qualms with homosexuality either."Natural and good" has 50% in the poll. I'm surprised it's not higher.
Make up your mind, are they Pauls words or gods?I am a Bible believing christian. My belief is what the Scriptures say. God speaking through apostle Paul said men lying with men and women lying with women is unnatural. God's words, not mine (Romans 1: 26-27). It is not our place to judge homosexuals. The word will judge in the end. We are to be compassionate and loving to all men, regardless of their sin. Our job is to lead men to Christ.
And the two unnatural ones and natural but not good only add up to 15%. Everything else, which in the minimum is in different, is 85%.I do believe that most of the "others" and "indifferent" find that it is natural, but neither good or bad. It is just found to be an orientation like any other. At least, that's what I posted and have seen others mention. So you may look at at least part of the numbers from other and indifferent as having no qualms with homosexuality either.
Are you actually going to equate being against a practice that kills millions with being in favor of a political party who killed millions. Come on, liberals are the best at dishonestly setting up false moral high ground labels, and the practice is sickening.If you simply believe homsexuality to be wrong then I can't stop you. I can't stop you from being a NAZI if that is your thing. It doesn't make it a moral position. Though if this conversation was to shift into a marriage equality argument you would have to defend against this position.
You can't possibly know if it natural. Even if it is you would not know it to be. You just declaring it is and insisting your declaration creates reality. All kinds of studies suggest it is not natural. There are even ones that show it is genetic yet still unnatural because it is a genetic mistake that causes a certain chemical to be produced in abnormal amounts. There is also mountains of evidence it is a moral perversion. Homosexuals statistically exceed heterosexual rates in all types of moral categories like spousal abuse, adultery, drug use, the length of marriage, etc...... It seems that homosexuals are in general less moral in many ways compared to heterosexuals.To a homosexual it would be both "natural" and "good". It is natural because it is innate within them (not the product of perversion or abuse) and it would be "good" as any sexual feelings/actions a heterosexual would have. It is unfortunate that there have been diseases that have been spread around but such as been since before humans. It wouldn't make the act of homosexual sex immoral or wrong.
I am not arguing about any specific subgroup but about a behavior in general. Regardless your are perfectly wrong. There is no way to practice homosexuality that does not carry risk of both disease and especially no disease related injury. Homosexuals are statistically less likely to practice safe sex. The idea that sexual discipline causes people to practice unsafe sex is an incoherent idea. I did not say homosexuality causes STD's (though I would not be surprised if it did in some cases), I said it spreads them at rates astronomically higher than in heterosexual statistics. Add to that that heterosexuality does have compensating gains which justify the risk where homosexuality does not.If there were two homosexual men who had never had previous sexual relationships before in their life and they practiced safe sex then they would not obtain an STI. However the repression of the sexuality has caused individuals to practice unsafe sex. Once an incurable disease that is easily transmitted got into the "pool" of people passing it around it would become incredibly difficult to maintain. However it is being controlled far better now. Though nothing innate about homosexual sex causes STI. That is important to note. Your argument should be geared against unsafe sex in general. There is nothing innate about a homosexual that makes him or her practice less safe sex. The stigma, self loathing, sexual repression, psychological torture and media portrayal of homosexualty has caused all of this.
You seem to think that you stating something makes it true. There is something wrong with homosexuality. If a practice which does not have compensating gains kills millions and costs billions is not evidence of a moral failure then what ever could be. How many killed and how many billions that others have to pay does it take to make something unjustifiable? I object to sex outside of marriage between anyone and homosexuals in any context. However within the bounds of marriage heterosexual behavior has compensating reasons to justify the risk that homosexuality lacks.So there is nothing more "wrong" about homosexual sex than heterosexual sex. Would you object to having sex with a member of the African American community? That is a slight increased risk of coming across someone with HIV.
Please pay strict attention to this. Homosexuality kills millions and does not have anything that can compensate for the cost that would justify the practice. Heterosexuality is necessary to keep the human race in existence. It has justification for the risks. The pleasure it gives homosexuals to practice it is no more justification for it than the pleasure it gives drug addicts to take drugs.But again the "good" that comes out of it is having a healthy sexual life which is profoundly important to individual happiness. There is no greater good than that.
Not only does it harm thousands against their will, it kills thousands without their knowledge. Homosexuals are promiscuous in general and many sleep with people of both sexes and there by transmit diseases to people they don't even know. Add to that that all of us have to pay the billions in medical care the unnatural habit makes necessary.No you can't. Homosexual sex is not a crime. It harms no one against their will. In fact if done correctly it harms no one at all.
Only in some contrived fantasy land is there no harm from homosexuality. I have posted in this thread entire lists of injuries and diseases that homosexuality causes in far higher amounts than heterosexuality. In reality it is extremely harmful and costly.If there is no harm why would it be considered "not good"?
"Advocating anal and oral sex to children"??? Who on Earth is doing that? I can't recall anyone even advocating vaginal intercourse to children. Children don't see people in the terms of what kind of sex they are having. They just see people. It is adults that impress upon children the insane ideas of how people are different and why and if it is good or bad. The opinions of parents and such that teach children biases and "that's wrong" and "that's icky you don't do that" that bring children up to hate and discriminate. Children only see people. I know my children do, I don't pass judgments on others, I don't set people apart, I treat others as equal. that's what example I give to my children and that's why they try to do the same.Advocating anal and oral sex to children in public is a criminal offense, is blasphemous, not ignorant but arrogant, short sighted, selfish thing.
Neglectful relationships are founded on adultery and atheism,
rape is the product of atheism and adultery as well as moral conflictions such as homosexuality.
the word homosexuality implies no other message than, anal and oral sex.
this subliminally promotes neglectful relationships in schools and outside of school, as well as corrupting imagination, motives, ambitions and morals of everyone.
Homosexuality is a 100% negative thing on humanity, culture and the world.
Political injustice is founded, enacted and justified by atheists.
You are being rather short sighted here, are you not?Advocating anal and oral sex to children in public is a criminal offense, is blasphemous, not ignorant but arrogant, short sighted, selfish thing.
Prove it.Neglectful relationships are founded on adultery and atheism,
Prove itrape is the product of atheism and adultery as well as moral conflictions such as homosexuality.
This may well explain your homophobia.the word homosexuality implies no other message than, anal and oral sex.
this subliminally promotes neglectful relationships in schools and outside of school, as well as corrupting imagination, motives, ambitions and morals of everyone.
Prove itHomosexuality is a 100% negative thing on humanity, culture and the world.
If you make the above claim with the dishonest intention of implying that theists are somehow innocent of the accusation, you are flat out lying.Political injustice is founded, enacted and justified by atheists.
I do believe that most of the "others" and "indifferent" find that it is natural, but neither good or bad. It is just found to be an orientation like any other. At least, that's what I posted and have seen others mention. So you may look at at least part of the numbers from other and indifferent as having no qualms with homosexuality either.
I am a Bible believing christian. My belief is what the Scriptures say. God speaking through apostle Paul said men lying with men and women lying with women is unnatural. God's words, not mine (Romans 1: 26-27). It is not our place to judge homosexuals. The word will judge in the end. We are to be compassionate and loving to all men, regardless of their sin. Our job is to lead men to Christ.
Advocating anal and oral sex to children in public is a criminal offense, is blasphemous, not ignorant but arrogant, short sighted, selfish thing.
Neglectful relationships are founded on adultery and atheism,
rape is the product of atheism and adultery as well as moral conflictions such as homosexuality.
the word homosexuality implies no other message than, anal and oral sex.
this subliminally promotes neglectful relationships in schools and outside of school, as well as corrupting imagination, motives, ambitions and morals of everyone.
Homosexuality is a 100% negative thing on humanity, culture and the world.
Political injustice is founded, enacted and justified by atheists.
There is nothing to make my mind up about. The Bible was written by men who were inspired by God. God spoke through the apostle Paul. You can choose to accept or reject that. I choose to accept.Make up your mind, are they Pauls words or gods?
Read the whole thread. Romans 1 is NOT about homosexuals.
It is about Sacred Sex - and says so.
Rom 1:24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
~~ ~ NOTE:the people in 24 that dishonor their bodies, art the people WHO worship the Act of Creationin 25! Religious Sexuality! ~~~ with the Sacred Prostitutes.
Rom 1:25 Who changed the truth of Deity into a lie, and worship and render religious homage to the "Act of Creation" more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
Homosexuals are not worshiping and rendering religious homage to God when they have sex!
*