Well at least now we know what you single, solitary source is for your Biblical interpretation. To the best of my knowledge, the NIV is one of the worst translations, and that it is unwise to base one's Biblical opinions on it. But maybe someone else here can confirm that.
I'm glad you
I hope you're not implying I'm an atheist. I'm closer to agnostic if I can be defined at all.
Hmmm...I would say that your "faith" is more of a blindness than the logical analysis I'm advocating.
Anyway, what's your definition of open-mindedness? Throwing reason aside, lowering one's memetic immunity so that you simply
absorb and accept any religious text unquestioningly? I know you don't like to use reason, but some of us find it useful. It's wiser to be skeptical of outrageous claims especially when those claims have little relation to the observable events/processes/science of the real world. If you make some wild assertion that the supernatural created and governs this universe, as a reasonable person I'm going to of course have "a notion set in [my] mind" that you're off your rocker. If you can prove this to me, and maybe to scientist in some peer review journals...then good for you, and I'll consider your beliefs. But the truth is I
have studied your book extensively and found it wanting...all because I didn't throw reason aside.