Which group gets to decide what that is since none of us were there when it was written and can't ask the authors?
Even the people who were there when it was written – who could read the original unaltered text in their own language had problems fully understanding it – have we learned the lesson of the scribes and the Pharisees? True understanding does not come entirely from a book – it comes from actions / work not just faith, from experiences gained through actually following the commandments, from the Holy Spirit, from personal revelations…
There are multiple meanings to each scripture - not just one. They are
symbolic parables, not allegories. In an allegory, the author assigns meaning to the symbols, and so each symbol has only one meaning, and the meaning is already defined. In one sense there is no reason to write anything as an allegory, best for the author to just state facts plainly to being with if their sole intent is nothing more than to burden readers with the limited perspective of one person. A parable is a work in which no symbol has only one meaning, and one in which the entire picture can only be seen through the combined eyes of many creators.
as far as relying on the Bible alone -
“
If one man can live upon the revelations given to another, might not I with propriety ask,
why the necessity, then, of the Lord speaking to Isaac as he did, as is recorded in the 26th chapter of Genesis? For the Lord there repeats, or rather promises again, to perform
the oath which he had previously sworn unto Abraham. And
why this repetition to Isaac? Why was not the first promise as sure for Isaac as it was for Abraham? Was not Isaac Abraham’s son? And could he not place implicit confidence in the word of his father as being a man of God? Perhaps you may say that he was a very peculiar man and different from men in these last days; consequently, the Lord favored him with blessings peculiar and different, as he was different from men in this age. I admit that he was a peculiar man and was not only peculiarly blessed, but greatly blessed. But all the peculiarity that I can discover in the man, or all the difference between him and men in this age, is that he was more holy and more perfect before God and came to him with a purer heart and more faith than men in this day.
“The same might be said on the subject of Jacob’s history. Why was it that the Lord spake to him concerning the same promise after he had made it once to Abraham and renewed it to Isaac? Why could not Jacob rest contented upon the word spoken to his fathers?
“When the time of the promise drew nigh for the deliverance of the children of Israel from the land of Egypt, why was it necessary that the Lord should begin to speak to them? The promise or word to Abraham was that his seed should serve in bondage and be afflicted four hundred years, and after that they should come out with great substance. Why did they not rely upon this promise and, when they had remained in Egypt in bondage four hundred years, come out without waiting for further revelation, but act entirely upon the promise given to Abraham that they should come out? …
“… I may believe that Enoch walked with God. I may believe that Abraham communed with God and conversed with angels. I may believe that Isaac obtained a renewal of the covenant made to Abraham by the direct voice of the Lord. I may believe that Jacob conversed with holy angels and heard the word of his Maker, that he wrestled with the angel until he prevailed and obtained a blessing. I may believe that Elijah was taken to heaven in a chariot of fire with fiery horses. I may believe that the saints saw the Lord and conversed with him face to face after his resurrection. I may believe that the Hebrew church came to Mount Zion and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels. I may believe that they looked into eternity and saw the Judge of all, and Jesus, the Mediator of the new covenant.
“But will all this purchase an assurance for me, or waft me to the regions of eternal day with my garments spotless, pure, and white? Or, must I not rather obtain for myself, by my own faith and diligence in keeping the commandments of the Lord, an assurance of salvation for myself? And have I not an equal privilege with the ancient saints? And will not the Lord hear my prayers and listen to my cries as soon as he ever did to theirs if I come to him in the manner they did?”
5
from
link
Well, the advantage of always daring to predict the end of the world is that eventually somebody will be right. In the meantime, the rest of us can enjoy the spectacle of almost all of them being wrong.
We are told that we will not know the hour or day - it states nothing about not knowing the month or year... personally, I am more inclined to go with Issac Newton's predictions - nothing exciting until after
2060
Math 24:
36 But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.
J/K of course